Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies within region (% of total merchandise exports) - Country Ranking - Asia

Definition: Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies within region are the sum of merchandise exports from the reporting economy to other low- and middle-income economies in the same World Bank region as a percentage of total merchandise exports by the economy. Data are computed only if at least half of the economies in the partner country group had non-missing data. No figures are shown for high-income economies, because they are a separate category in the World Bank classification of economies.

Source: World Bank staff estimates based data from International Monetary Fund's Direction of Trade database.

See also: Thematic map, Time series comparison

Find indicator:
Rank Country Value Year
1 Bhutan 98.21 2020
2 Mongolia 92.34 2020
3 Lao PDR 84.94 2020
4 Afghanistan 79.50 2020
5 Nepal 71.41 2020
6 Georgia 60.22 2020
7 Myanmar 53.35 2020
8 Syrian Arab Republic 49.43 2020
9 Yemen 44.20 2020
10 Kyrgyz Republic 42.72 2020
11 Timor-Leste 38.56 2020
12 Armenia 37.51 2020
13 Indonesia 35.30 2020
14 Thailand 32.81 2020
15 Uzbekistan 32.53 2020
16 Tajikistan 31.82 2020
17 Azerbaijan 31.79 2020
18 Dem. People's Rep. Korea 30.45 2020
19 Malaysia 29.34 2020
20 Philippines 25.31 2020
21 Vietnam 24.72 2020
22 Kazakhstan 23.20 2020
23 Russia 20.17 2020
24 Turkmenistan 18.51 2020
25 Jordan 17.64 2020
26 Lebanon 14.66 2020
27 China 12.86 2020
28 Cambodia 12.48 2020
29 Turkey 11.82 2020
30 Sri Lanka 9.22 2020
31 Pakistan 7.76 2020
32 India 6.85 2020
33 Bangladesh 3.20 2020
34 Iran 1.05 2020
35 Iraq 0.71 2020

More rankings: Africa | Asia | Central America & the Caribbean | Europe | Middle East | North America | Oceania | South America | World |

Development Relevance: The relative importance of intraregional trade is higher for both landlocked countries and small countries with close trade links to the largest regional economy. For most low- and middle-income economies - especially smaller ones - there is a "geographic bias" favoring intraregional trade. Despite the broad trend toward globalization and the reduction of trade barriers, the relative share of intraregional trade increased for most economies between 1999 and 2010. This is due partly to trade-related advantages, such as proximity, lower transport costs, increased knowledge from repeated interaction, and cultural and historical affinity. The direction of trade is also influenced by preferential trade agreements that a country has made with other economies. Though formal agreements on trade liberalization do not automatically increase trade, they nevertheless affect the direction of trade between the participating economies.

Limitations and Exceptions: Data on exports and imports are from the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) Direction of Trade database and should be broadly consistent with data from other sources, such as the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. All high-income economies and major low- and middle-income economies report trade data to the IMF on a timely basis, covering about 85 percent of trade for recent years. Trade data for less timely reporters and for countries that do not report are estimated using reports of trading partner countries. Therefore, data on trade between developing and high-income economies should be generally complete. But trade flows between many low- and middle-income economies - particularly those in Sub-Saharan Africa - are not well recorded, and the value of trade among low- and middle-income economies may be understated.

Aggregation method: Weighted average

Periodicity: Annual