Triple Superphosphate Monthly Price - Pakistan Rupee per Metric Ton

Data as of March 2026

Range
Apr 2006 - Jan 2019: 37,248.990 (309.71%)
Chart

Description: TSP (triple superphosphate), bulk, spot, beginning October 2006, Tunisian origin, granular, fob; previously US origin, f.o.b. US Gulf

Unit: Pakistan Rupee per Metric Ton



Source: Fertilizer Week; Fertilizer International; World Bank.

See also: Agricultural production statistics

See also: Top commodity suppliers

See also: Commodities glossary - Definitions of terms used in commodity trading

Overview

Triple superphosphate (TSP) is a concentrated phosphate fertilizer produced by reacting phosphate rock with phosphoric acid. It is typically priced on a free on board (FOB) basis at export hubs, with the US Gulf commonly used as a reference point for spot market assessment. Prices are usually quoted in US dollars per metric ton. TSP is valued for its high phosphorus content and is used primarily as a direct-applied fertilizer in agriculture, especially where soils are deficient in available phosphorus. It is also blended with other fertilizers to create customized nutrient formulations.

In commodity markets, TSP is part of the broader phosphate fertilizer complex, alongside diammonium phosphate, monoammonium phosphate, and single superphosphate. Its market behavior reflects both agricultural nutrient demand and the industrial structure of phosphate rock mining, acid production, and fertilizer granulation. Because phosphorus is an essential plant nutrient with no practical substitute in crop production, TSP remains an important input for field crops, pasture, and perennial plantings.

Supply Drivers

Supply is shaped by the geology of phosphate rock deposits, the availability of sulfur and phosphoric acid, and the location of fertilizer manufacturing capacity near mining or port infrastructure. Major producing regions are concentrated in countries with large sedimentary phosphate reserves and established chemical processing systems, because phosphate rock must be upgraded through beneficiation and acidulation before it becomes TSP. This makes supply more capital intensive than many other agricultural inputs.

Production is constrained by mining depletion, ore grade variation, and the need for continuous operation of acid plants and granulation units. Output depends on the reliability of rail, pipeline, port, and bulk shipping networks, since fertilizer is heavy and relatively low in value per ton compared with many industrial chemicals. Energy costs matter because mining, drying, grinding, and acid production are all energy-intensive. Environmental regulation also affects supply through controls on emissions, gypsum disposal, and water use.

Unlike annual crops, phosphate fertilizer supply does not follow a harvest cycle, but it is still exposed to maintenance outages, weather disruptions at ports, and logistical bottlenecks. Because new mines and chemical plants require long lead times and substantial permitting, supply tends to adjust slowly to changes in demand.

Demand Drivers

Demand is driven by the need to replenish phosphorus removed from soils by crop harvests. TSP is used most heavily in agriculture, where it supports root development, flowering, and early plant growth. It is especially relevant in soils with low plant-available phosphorus, including many weathered tropical soils and intensively farmed temperate soils. Because phosphorus is not readily mobile in soil, placement and timing of application influence agronomic effectiveness, which supports demand for direct-applied fertilizers such as TSP.

Demand is linked to planted acreage, crop mix, and fertilizer application intensity. Field crops such as cereals, oilseeds, and legumes are important end users, while pasture and forage systems also consume phosphate fertilizers to maintain productivity. TSP competes with other phosphate products, particularly diammonium phosphate and monoammonium phosphate, which may be preferred when nitrogen and phosphorus are both needed. Single superphosphate can substitute in some settings, especially where sulfur is also desired.

Seasonality reflects planting calendars and regional application windows, so buying patterns often cluster ahead of field use. Long-run demand is supported by population growth, dietary demand for crop and livestock products, and the need to maintain soil fertility under continuous cultivation. Fertilizer use is also influenced by soil testing practices, extension services, and the economics of crop returns relative to input costs.

Macro and Financial Drivers

TSP prices are influenced by the US dollar because international fertilizer trade is commonly denominated in dollars. A stronger dollar can make dollar-priced fertilizer more expensive in local currency terms for importing countries, which can affect buying behavior. Freight rates, bunker fuel costs, and port congestion also matter because TSP is traded in bulk and shipped long distances.

The commodity is sensitive to broader agricultural cycles and to the cost of capital for inventories. When financing costs rise, merchants and distributors may reduce stockholding, which can tighten spot availability. Storage is feasible but not costless, so market structure can shift between contango and backwardation depending on supply tightness, seasonal demand, and logistics. TSP also tends to move with the wider phosphate fertilizer complex because buyers can switch among phosphate products based on nutrient ratios and relative prices.

MonthPriceChange
Apr 200612,026.95-
May 200612,043.420.14%
Jun 200612,067.190.20%
Jul 200612,178.290.92%
Aug 200612,186.050.06%
Sep 200612,218.610.27%
Oct 200612,238.440.16%
Nov 200612,263.380.20%
Dec 200612,513.162.04%
Jan 200712,636.690.99%
Feb 200713,068.163.41%
Mar 200715,449.7118.22%
Apr 200718,218.9417.92%
May 200720,512.0812.59%
Jun 200721,530.314.96%
Jul 200721,450.76-0.37%
Aug 200722,836.096.46%
Sep 200723,795.574.20%
Oct 200724,450.142.75%
Nov 200725,840.015.68%
Dec 200727,358.315.88%
Jan 200833,010.2020.66%
Feb 200844,653.1535.27%
Mar 200853,707.4820.28%
Apr 200865,585.1222.12%
May 200870,313.447.21%
Jun 200870,271.67-0.06%
Jul 200878,820.8312.17%
Aug 200884,360.087.03%
Sep 200883,467.92-1.06%
Oct 200877,527.13-7.12%
Nov 200848,481.49-37.47%
Dec 200832,030.33-33.93%
Jan 200927,740.49-13.39%
Feb 200925,469.25-8.19%
Mar 200923,718.29-6.87%
Apr 200922,389.83-5.60%
May 200919,763.86-11.73%
Jun 200917,845.15-9.71%
Jul 200918,425.743.25%
Aug 200918,653.001.23%
Sep 200918,662.920.05%
Oct 200920,534.6310.03%
Nov 200919,093.60-7.02%
Dec 200919,518.262.22%
Jan 201025,075.3828.47%
Feb 201025,493.811.67%
Mar 201029,928.6917.40%
Apr 201031,286.134.54%
May 201029,764.98-4.86%
Jun 201029,605.31-0.54%
Jul 201030,814.794.09%
Aug 201032,621.625.86%
Sep 201036,748.1912.65%
Oct 201039,135.326.50%
Nov 201039,697.901.44%
Dec 201040,529.642.10%
Jan 201140,734.450.51%
Feb 201141,838.532.71%
Mar 201142,187.840.83%
Apr 201145,359.357.52%
May 201146,659.452.87%
Jun 201147,173.521.10%
Jul 201147,782.321.29%
Aug 201148,546.281.60%
Sep 201149,011.540.96%
Oct 201151,513.425.10%
Nov 201149,560.65-3.79%
Dec 201147,387.92-4.38%
Jan 201239,278.70-17.11%
Feb 201240,380.842.81%
Mar 201240,069.27-0.77%
Apr 201240,031.24-0.09%
May 201244,257.6710.56%
Jun 201245,723.593.31%
Jul 201245,815.110.20%
Aug 201245,850.060.08%
Sep 201245,903.800.12%
Oct 201245,231.67-1.46%
Nov 201242,993.16-4.95%
Dec 201242,318.54-1.57%
Jan 201341,755.99-1.33%
Feb 201341,078.56-1.62%
Mar 201340,731.10-0.85%
Apr 201340,242.05-1.20%
May 201340,368.620.31%
Jun 201340,458.320.22%
Jul 201341,288.382.05%
Aug 201337,114.95-10.11%
Sep 201336,281.84-2.24%
Oct 201334,454.48-5.04%
Nov 201334,416.39-0.11%
Dec 201334,274.53-0.41%
Jan 201435,132.462.50%
Feb 201438,599.919.87%
Mar 201438,351.79-0.64%
Apr 201437,412.01-2.45%
May 201438,010.701.60%
Jun 201438,348.310.89%
Jul 201438,526.220.46%
Aug 201439,239.261.85%
Sep 201440,811.274.01%
Oct 201440,958.480.36%
Nov 201439,247.51-4.18%
Dec 201438,463.53-2.00%
Jan 201538,473.510.03%
Feb 201538,834.690.94%
Mar 201539,016.750.47%
Apr 201538,674.98-0.88%
May 201538,713.250.10%
Jun 201538,697.73-0.04%
Jul 201538,675.95-0.06%
Aug 201538,809.420.35%
Sep 201539,553.991.92%
Oct 201539,752.210.50%
Nov 201538,656.44-2.76%
Dec 201537,724.88-2.41%
Jan 201635,048.32-7.09%
Feb 201629,976.44-14.47%
Mar 201630,505.571.77%
Apr 201630,904.311.31%
May 201630,906.620.01%
Jun 201629,834.31-3.47%
Jul 201629,463.79-1.24%
Aug 201629,457.42-0.02%
Sep 201630,037.111.97%
Oct 201629,848.35-0.63%
Nov 201629,870.910.08%
Dec 201629,092.64-2.61%
Jan 201728,310.29-2.69%
Feb 201729,222.583.22%
Mar 201730,198.223.34%
Apr 201729,883.67-1.04%
May 201728,834.16-3.51%
Jun 201728,841.960.03%
Jul 201729,124.510.98%
Aug 201729,563.731.51%
Sep 201729,852.660.98%
Oct 201729,888.710.12%
Nov 201731,107.024.08%
Dec 201733,672.698.25%
Jan 201835,376.185.06%
Feb 201835,379.300.01%
Mar 201836,333.552.70%
Apr 201837,571.293.41%
May 201837,690.480.32%
Jun 201840,029.776.21%
Jul 201843,045.197.53%
Aug 201844,370.753.08%
Sep 201846,748.525.36%
Oct 201850,506.708.04%
Nov 201850,775.630.53%
Dec 201851,090.420.62%
Jan 201949,275.94-3.55%

Commodities Market

  • Buyers: Request price quotes
  • Sellers: List your products
Sign up to get an email when we update our commodities data

 


Your email will never be shared, sold, nor rented. We hate SPAM as much you do.
Coming Soon