Triple Superphosphate Monthly Price - Sri Lanka Rupee per Metric Ton

Data as of March 2026

Range
Jun 2006 - Jan 2019: 43,955.870 (211.81%)
Chart

Description: TSP (triple superphosphate), bulk, spot, beginning October 2006, Tunisian origin, granular, fob; previously US origin, f.o.b. US Gulf

Unit: Sri Lanka Rupee per Metric Ton



Source: Fertilizer Week; Fertilizer International; World Bank.

See also: Agricultural production statistics

See also: Top commodity suppliers

See also: Commodities glossary - Definitions of terms used in commodity trading

Overview

Triple superphosphate (TSP) is a concentrated phosphate fertilizer produced by reacting phosphate rock with phosphoric acid. It is typically priced on a free on board (FOB) basis at export hubs, with the US Gulf commonly used as a reference point for spot market assessment. Prices are usually quoted in US dollars per metric ton. TSP is valued for its high phosphorus content and is used primarily as a direct-applied fertilizer in agriculture, especially where soils are deficient in available phosphorus. It is also blended with other fertilizers to create customized nutrient formulations.

In commodity markets, TSP is part of the broader phosphate fertilizer complex, alongside diammonium phosphate, monoammonium phosphate, and single superphosphate. Its market behavior reflects both agricultural nutrient demand and the industrial structure of phosphate rock mining, acid production, and fertilizer granulation. Because phosphorus is an essential plant nutrient with no practical substitute in crop production, TSP remains an important input for field crops, pasture, and perennial plantings.

Supply Drivers

Supply is shaped by the geology of phosphate rock deposits, the availability of sulfur and phosphoric acid, and the location of fertilizer manufacturing capacity near mining or port infrastructure. Major producing regions are concentrated in countries with large sedimentary phosphate reserves and established chemical processing systems, because phosphate rock must be upgraded through beneficiation and acidulation before it becomes TSP. This makes supply more capital intensive than many other agricultural inputs.

Production is constrained by mining depletion, ore grade variation, and the need for continuous operation of acid plants and granulation units. Output depends on the reliability of rail, pipeline, port, and bulk shipping networks, since fertilizer is heavy and relatively low in value per ton compared with many industrial chemicals. Energy costs matter because mining, drying, grinding, and acid production are all energy-intensive. Environmental regulation also affects supply through controls on emissions, gypsum disposal, and water use.

Unlike annual crops, phosphate fertilizer supply does not follow a harvest cycle, but it is still exposed to maintenance outages, weather disruptions at ports, and logistical bottlenecks. Because new mines and chemical plants require long lead times and substantial permitting, supply tends to adjust slowly to changes in demand.

Demand Drivers

Demand is driven by the need to replenish phosphorus removed from soils by crop harvests. TSP is used most heavily in agriculture, where it supports root development, flowering, and early plant growth. It is especially relevant in soils with low plant-available phosphorus, including many weathered tropical soils and intensively farmed temperate soils. Because phosphorus is not readily mobile in soil, placement and timing of application influence agronomic effectiveness, which supports demand for direct-applied fertilizers such as TSP.

Demand is linked to planted acreage, crop mix, and fertilizer application intensity. Field crops such as cereals, oilseeds, and legumes are important end users, while pasture and forage systems also consume phosphate fertilizers to maintain productivity. TSP competes with other phosphate products, particularly diammonium phosphate and monoammonium phosphate, which may be preferred when nitrogen and phosphorus are both needed. Single superphosphate can substitute in some settings, especially where sulfur is also desired.

Seasonality reflects planting calendars and regional application windows, so buying patterns often cluster ahead of field use. Long-run demand is supported by population growth, dietary demand for crop and livestock products, and the need to maintain soil fertility under continuous cultivation. Fertilizer use is also influenced by soil testing practices, extension services, and the economics of crop returns relative to input costs.

Macro and Financial Drivers

TSP prices are influenced by the US dollar because international fertilizer trade is commonly denominated in dollars. A stronger dollar can make dollar-priced fertilizer more expensive in local currency terms for importing countries, which can affect buying behavior. Freight rates, bunker fuel costs, and port congestion also matter because TSP is traded in bulk and shipped long distances.

The commodity is sensitive to broader agricultural cycles and to the cost of capital for inventories. When financing costs rise, merchants and distributors may reduce stockholding, which can tighten spot availability. Storage is feasible but not costless, so market structure can shift between contango and backwardation depending on supply tightness, seasonal demand, and logistics. TSP also tends to move with the wider phosphate fertilizer complex because buyers can switch among phosphate products based on nutrient ratios and relative prices.

MonthPriceChange
Jun 200620,752.90-
Jul 200621,004.011.21%
Aug 200620,963.89-0.19%
Sep 200620,703.54-1.24%
Oct 200621,321.082.98%
Nov 200621,778.892.15%
Dec 200622,160.721.75%
Jan 200722,524.101.64%
Feb 200723,370.343.76%
Mar 200727,823.6619.06%
Apr 200732,820.8317.96%
May 200737,482.2714.20%
Jun 200739,395.285.10%
Jul 200739,639.050.62%
Aug 200742,321.956.77%
Sep 200744,485.495.11%
Oct 200745,543.072.38%
Nov 200746,827.582.82%
Dec 200748,768.394.14%
Jan 200858,358.5919.66%
Feb 200878,680.8834.82%
Mar 200894,333.9119.89%
Apr 2008110,934.7017.60%
May 2008111,780.000.76%
Jun 2008112,463.400.61%
Jul 2008119,756.506.48%
Aug 2008121,921.301.81%
Sep 2008116,413.70-4.52%
Oct 2008104,290.60-10.41%
Nov 200866,663.59-36.08%
Dec 200845,103.95-32.34%
Jan 200939,822.36-11.71%
Feb 200936,454.33-8.46%
Mar 200933,706.05-7.54%
Apr 200932,628.83-3.20%
May 200928,645.69-12.21%
Jun 200925,278.74-11.75%
Jul 200925,738.791.82%
Aug 200925,843.750.41%
Sep 200925,829.56-0.05%
Oct 200928,299.139.56%
Nov 200926,165.41-7.54%
Dec 200926,528.091.39%
Jan 201033,876.7627.70%
Feb 201034,360.841.43%
Mar 201040,463.9917.76%
Apr 201042,425.094.85%
May 201040,119.91-5.43%
Jun 201039,400.57-1.79%
Jul 201040,704.393.31%
Aug 201042,815.115.19%
Sep 201048,135.8112.43%
Oct 201050,868.415.68%
Nov 201051,764.951.76%
Dec 201052,498.841.42%
Jan 201152,703.990.39%
Feb 201154,373.493.17%
Mar 201154,517.270.26%
Apr 201159,074.478.36%
May 201160,122.651.77%
Jun 201160,221.510.16%
Jul 201160,773.850.92%
Aug 201161,487.411.17%
Sep 201161,679.950.31%
Oct 201165,291.315.86%
Nov 201163,292.69-3.06%
Dec 201160,366.86-4.62%
Jan 201249,546.08-17.93%
Feb 201252,168.435.29%
Mar 201255,383.606.16%
Apr 201256,770.192.50%
May 201262,633.3210.33%
Jun 201264,039.492.25%
Jul 201264,420.260.59%
Aug 201264,054.36-0.57%
Sep 201263,902.53-0.24%
Oct 201261,162.14-4.29%
Nov 201258,329.09-4.63%
Dec 201255,911.53-4.14%
Jan 201354,289.59-2.90%
Feb 201353,068.71-2.25%
Mar 201352,613.15-0.86%
Apr 201351,546.25-2.03%
May 201351,785.820.46%
Jun 201352,400.661.19%
Jul 201353,731.252.54%
Aug 201347,458.17-11.67%
Sep 201345,570.41-3.98%
Oct 201342,476.27-6.79%
Nov 201341,943.25-1.25%
Dec 201341,866.94-0.18%
Jan 201443,532.533.98%
Feb 201448,006.2710.28%
Mar 201450,154.054.47%
Apr 201450,028.30-0.25%
May 201450,223.200.39%
Jun 201450,681.480.91%
Jul 201450,793.180.22%
Aug 201450,903.700.22%
Sep 201451,844.801.85%
Oct 201451,983.170.27%
Nov 201450,407.64-3.03%
Dec 201449,919.52-0.97%
Jan 201550,201.860.57%
Feb 201550,767.261.13%
Mar 201550,900.300.26%
Apr 201550,501.70-0.78%
May 201550,724.180.44%
Jun 201550,880.180.31%
Jul 201550,802.05-0.15%
Aug 201550,707.84-0.19%
Sep 201552,620.813.77%
Oct 201553,548.321.76%
Nov 201551,996.79-2.90%
Dec 201551,639.68-0.69%
Jan 201648,075.91-6.90%
Feb 201641,200.11-14.30%
Mar 201641,929.081.77%
Apr 201642,450.541.24%
May 201642,965.271.21%
Jun 201641,406.27-3.63%
Jul 201640,861.82-1.31%
Aug 201640,950.270.22%
Sep 201641,844.702.18%
Oct 201641,858.960.03%
Nov 201642,109.410.60%
Dec 201641,314.75-1.89%
Jan 201740,525.08-1.91%
Feb 201742,040.263.74%
Mar 201743,612.143.74%
Apr 201743,248.96-0.83%
May 201741,889.57-3.14%
Jun 201742,028.450.33%
Jul 201742,377.450.83%
Aug 201742,970.631.40%
Sep 201743,302.610.77%
Oct 201743,527.840.52%
Nov 201745,327.604.13%
Dec 201747,288.814.33%
Jan 201849,216.514.08%
Feb 201849,550.390.68%
Mar 201850,448.831.81%
Apr 201850,768.550.63%
May 201851,472.851.39%
Jun 201853,320.623.59%
Jul 201854,867.452.90%
Aug 201857,342.544.51%
Sep 201861,922.377.99%
Oct 201865,938.736.49%
Nov 201867,028.751.65%
Dec 201866,279.00-1.12%
Jan 201964,708.77-2.37%

Commodities Market

  • Buyers: Request price quotes
  • Sellers: List your products
Sign up to get an email when we update our commodities data

 


Your email will never be shared, sold, nor rented. We hate SPAM as much you do.
Coming Soon