Sugar, European import price Monthly Price - Pakistan Rupee per Kilogram

Data as of March 2026

Range
May 2001 - Jan 2019: 19.404 (60.72%)
Chart

Description: Sugar (EU), European Union negotiated import price for raw unpackaged sugar from African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) under Lome Conventions, c.I.f. European ports

Unit: Pakistan Rupee per Kilogram



Source: International Monetary Fund; World Bank.

See also: Agricultural production statistics

See also: Top commodity suppliers

See also: Commodities glossary - Definitions of terms used in commodity trading

Overview

European import price for sugar refers to the price paid for imported raw or refined sugar entering European markets, typically quoted in US dollars per kilogram for comparability across origins and contracts. In commodity markets, sugar is commonly traded in standardized raw sugar and white sugar contracts, with benchmark pricing often linked to futures on major exchanges and to physical differentials for quality, freight, and destination. The underlying product is usually sucrose derived from sugarcane or sugar beet, then processed into raw, refined, or specialty grades.

Sugar is a basic food ingredient and an industrial input. It is used in confectionery, bakery products, beverages, dairy products, and household consumption, and it also serves as a feedstock for fermentation and other food-processing applications. Because it is bulky, storable, and globally traded, import prices reflect both the underlying world sugar balance and the costs of moving sugar from surplus-producing regions to deficit-consuming regions. Differences in polarity, color, moisture, and refining quality also create price spreads between raw and white sugar.

Supply Drivers

Sugar supply is shaped by the biology of cane and beet production, the geography of growing regions, and the capacity of mills and ports to move bulk cargoes. Sugarcane production is concentrated in tropical and subtropical climates, while sugar beet grows in temperate regions with cooler growing seasons. This geographic split creates a structural dependence on weather, rainfall timing, and temperature patterns. Cane yields are sensitive to drought, excess rain, and cyclone damage; beet yields are sensitive to frost, heat stress, and disease pressure. Because both crops are harvested seasonally, supply is not continuous and inventories bridge the gap between harvests and consumption.

Production is also constrained by processing infrastructure. Cane must be crushed soon after harvest to preserve sucrose content, so mill location and transport links matter. Beet requires nearby factories because the root crop deteriorates after lifting. Refining capacity, port access, and inland logistics influence whether surplus sugar reaches import markets efficiently. In addition, crop rotation, land availability, and input costs such as fertilizer and energy affect planting decisions and extraction economics. Sugar production can also shift between food and fuel uses in cane-producing regions, because mills can allocate cane juice or molasses toward ethanol or sugar depending on relative returns.

Demand Drivers

Sugar demand is driven by food consumption, industrial food processing, and beverage manufacturing. It is a staple sweetener in households and a functional ingredient in processed foods, where it contributes sweetness, texture, browning, preservation, and fermentation. Demand is therefore linked not only to direct consumption but also to broader patterns in packaged foods, confectionery, bakery goods, and soft drinks. In many markets, per-capita sugar intake is influenced by income, urbanization, and dietary habits, while industrial demand reflects the scale of food manufacturing.

Substitution matters. Sugar competes with alternative sweeteners such as high-fructose corn syrup, glucose syrups, and non-nutritive sweeteners in some applications, although substitution is limited by product formulation, taste, and regulatory rules. In Europe, beet sugar production and import demand interact with domestic crop conditions and with the needs of refiners and food processors. Seasonal demand can rise around holiday baking and confectionery production, while beverage and ice cream demand often follows warmer weather. Long-run demand is also shaped by public-health preferences and reformulation trends, which can reduce sugar intensity in some products even when total food consumption continues to grow.

Macro and Financial Drivers

Because sugar is internationally priced in US dollars, exchange-rate movements affect import costs for European buyers. A stronger dollar tends to raise local-currency import prices, while a weaker dollar lowers them, all else equal. Freight rates, insurance, and financing costs also matter because sugar is a bulk commodity with meaningful storage and transport expenses. When nearby supply is tight, the market can move into backwardation, rewarding immediate delivery; when inventories are ample, contango can appear as storage and carry costs are reflected in forward prices.

Sugar prices also respond to broader commodity cycles through energy markets and agricultural input costs. Energy prices influence milling, refining, freight, and, in cane-producing regions, the relative attractiveness of sugar versus ethanol. Interest rates affect the cost of holding inventories and financing trade flows. As a food commodity, sugar does not function as a classic inflation hedge in the same way as some hard assets, but it can participate in broad agricultural price movements when weather, transport, or currency conditions tighten global supply.

MonthPriceChange
May 200131.95-
Jun 200132.361.28%
Jul 200133.062.14%
Aug 200134.022.91%
Sep 200134.020.02%
Oct 200133.20-2.43%
Nov 200132.61-1.77%
Dec 200132.26-1.09%
Jan 200231.57-2.12%
Feb 200231.30-0.86%
Mar 200231.27-0.10%
Apr 200231.861.89%
May 200231.860.00%
Jun 200232.471.91%
Jul 200234.185.26%
Aug 200233.35-2.42%
Sep 200233.801.34%
Oct 200233.74-0.19%
Nov 200234.060.95%
Dec 200233.95-0.31%
Jan 200334.381.28%
Feb 200334.27-0.34%
Mar 200333.57-2.03%
Apr 200333.52-0.15%
May 200334.061.62%
Jun 200335.213.37%
Jul 200334.08-3.22%
Aug 200333.52-1.65%
Sep 200334.091.73%
Oct 200335.163.12%
Nov 200334.98-0.52%
Dec 200336.624.70%
Jan 200438.475.05%
Feb 200439.021.45%
Mar 200438.48-1.38%
Apr 200437.93-1.45%
May 200437.47-1.21%
Jun 200438.793.55%
Jul 200439.020.59%
Aug 200439.210.47%
Sep 200438.92-0.72%
Oct 200439.080.40%
Nov 200440.393.35%
Dec 200442.254.60%
Jan 200540.80-3.44%
Feb 200540.800.00%
Mar 200541.391.45%
Apr 200540.80-1.43%
May 200540.46-0.83%
Jun 200539.99-1.15%
Jul 200538.17-4.55%
Aug 200539.383.17%
Sep 200539.500.30%
Oct 200538.22-3.23%
Nov 200537.66-1.46%
Dec 200538.291.67%
Jan 200638.901.59%
Feb 200638.32-1.49%
Mar 200638.400.20%
Apr 200638.991.54%
May 200640.854.76%
Jun 200640.32-1.28%
Jul 200637.98-5.81%
Aug 200638.611.65%
Sep 200638.11-1.30%
Oct 200638.170.16%
Nov 200638.851.79%
Dec 200640.193.43%
Jan 200739.58-1.50%
Feb 200739.51-0.19%
Mar 200740.071.41%
Apr 200740.691.55%
May 200740.64-0.11%
Jun 200740.63-0.02%
Jul 200741.091.12%
Aug 200741.140.11%
Sep 200741.831.69%
Oct 200743.093.00%
Nov 200744.513.31%
Dec 200744.08-0.98%
Jan 200844.691.39%
Feb 200844.690.00%
Mar 200847.235.68%
Apr 200849.715.26%
May 200852.215.02%
Jun 200851.87-0.65%
Jul 200855.266.54%
Aug 200855.17-0.17%
Sep 200854.91-0.47%
Oct 200842.58-22.46%
Nov 200840.00-6.06%
Dec 200841.924.79%
Jan 200941.21-1.67%
Feb 200939.80-3.44%
Mar 200941.815.06%
Apr 200941.880.17%
May 200943.564.01%
Jun 200944.612.41%
Jul 200946.063.25%
Aug 200946.430.78%
Sep 200944.79-3.52%
Oct 200940.82-8.87%
Nov 200941.782.35%
Dec 200941.22-1.33%
Jan 201040.63-1.44%
Feb 201039.09-3.79%
Mar 201038.00-2.78%
Apr 201037.80-0.55%
May 201035.44-6.23%
Jun 201035.00-1.24%
Jul 201036.815.16%
Aug 201036.840.09%
Sep 201037.782.54%
Oct 201038.712.45%
Nov 201038.52-0.48%
Dec 201036.88-4.25%
Jan 201137.732.30%
Feb 201138.421.83%
Mar 201139.282.24%
Apr 201139.801.32%
May 201140.050.64%
Jun 201140.350.73%
Jul 201140.460.29%
Aug 201140.740.69%
Sep 201139.38-3.34%
Oct 201139.12-0.66%
Nov 201138.26-2.22%
Dec 201138.450.50%
Jan 201237.92-1.36%
Feb 201239.022.89%
Mar 201239.050.07%
Apr 201239.01-0.09%
May 201238.33-1.75%
Jun 201238.650.85%
Jul 201237.79-2.24%
Aug 201238.762.58%
Sep 201239.752.56%
Oct 201240.080.82%
Nov 201240.350.68%
Dec 201241.833.67%
Jan 201341.950.28%
Feb 201343.142.83%
Mar 201341.22-4.44%
Apr 201342.312.64%
May 201341.35-2.26%
Jun 201342.432.61%
Jul 201343.302.05%
Aug 201344.332.38%
Sep 201346.414.68%
Oct 201347.853.12%
Nov 201347.32-1.11%
Dec 201348.201.85%
Jan 201446.42-3.69%
Feb 201447.331.96%
Mar 201444.94-5.04%
Apr 201443.96-2.20%
May 201444.431.07%
Jun 201443.38-2.37%
Jul 201443.470.21%
Aug 201443.15-0.72%
Sep 201443.07-0.20%
Oct 201442.19-2.03%
Nov 201441.80-0.94%
Dec 201440.38-3.38%
Jan 201538.32-5.10%
Feb 201537.57-1.97%
Mar 201535.65-5.09%
Apr 201535.870.61%
May 201536.682.24%
Jun 201537.682.74%
Jul 201536.64-2.76%
Aug 201536.880.66%
Sep 201538.614.69%
Oct 201538.710.24%
Nov 201536.93-4.60%
Dec 201537.722.16%
Jan 201636.73-2.64%
Feb 201637.702.65%
Mar 201637.710.02%
Apr 201638.762.80%
May 201638.760.01%
Jun 201638.73-0.08%
Jul 201637.75-2.54%
Aug 201638.752.66%
Sep 201638.72-0.08%
Oct 201637.70-2.64%
Nov 201636.68-2.70%
Dec 201635.65-2.83%
Jan 201736.702.96%
Feb 201736.69-0.02%
Mar 201736.700.02%
Apr 201736.700.00%
May 201737.752.85%
Jun 201738.812.81%
Jul 201740.143.43%
Aug 201741.102.42%
Sep 201741.110.01%
Oct 201740.06-2.55%
Nov 201740.070.02%
Dec 201742.536.15%
Jan 201844.223.96%
Feb 201844.220.01%
Mar 201844.861.43%
Apr 201846.243.09%
May 201845.09-2.49%
Jun 201845.380.64%
Jul 201847.524.71%
Aug 201847.15-0.77%
Sep 201847.210.14%
Oct 201849.855.58%
Nov 201849.54-0.62%
Dec 201851.323.59%
Jan 201951.360.07%

Top Companies

Südzucker AG
Website: http://www.suedzucker.de/
Location: Manheim, Germany
Estimated Production: 4.6 million tonnes per year

Commodities Market

  • Buyers: Request price quotes
  • Sellers: List your products
Sign up to get an email when we update our commodities data

 


Your email will never be shared, sold, nor rented. We hate SPAM as much you do.
Coming Soon