Rubber Monthly Price - Russian Ruble per Kilogram

Data as of March 2026

Range
May 2003 - Apr 2013: 59.018 (190.89%)
Chart

Description: Rubber (Asia), RSS3 grade, Singapore Commodity Exchange Ltd (SICOM) nearby contract beginning 2004; during 2000 to 2003, Singapore RSS1; previously Malaysia RSS1

Unit: Russian Ruble per Kilogram



Source: Singapore Exchange Ltd (SGX previously SICOM); Bloomberg; Rubber Association of Singapore Commodity Exchange (RASCE); International Rubber Study Group; Asian Wall Street Journal; World Bank.

See also: Agricultural production statistics

See also: Top commodity suppliers

See also: Commodities glossary - Definitions of terms used in commodity trading

Overview

Rubber in commodity markets usually refers to natural rubber, a plant-derived polymer harvested as latex from rubber trees and processed into standardized grades for trade. The most widely followed benchmark is RSS3, a ribbed smoked sheet grade quoted on the Singapore Commodity Exchange (SICOM) in US dollars per kilogram. Natural rubber is valued for its elasticity, tensile strength, and resistance to abrasion, which make it suitable for tires, conveyor belts, hoses, seals, footwear, and many industrial products. It is distinct from synthetic rubber, which is produced from petrochemical feedstocks, but the two are often close substitutes in many applications.

Prices are typically quoted by grade, delivery location, and contract month, with benchmark contracts used to hedge exposure to physical supply and manufacturing demand. Because rubber is an agricultural raw material, its market reflects both biological production constraints and industrial consumption patterns. The commodity is especially important to the tire industry, where performance requirements and cost considerations determine the balance between natural and synthetic rubber. Its pricing also reflects transport, processing, and quality differentials between producing regions and consuming centers.

Supply Drivers

Natural rubber supply is shaped by the biology of the rubber tree, which requires several years of growth before tapping begins and then produces latex over a long but finite productive life. This creates a lag between planting decisions and marketable output, so supply responds slowly to price signals. Production is concentrated in tropical regions with warm temperatures, high rainfall, and suitable soils, especially Southeast Asia, with additional output from parts of South Asia, West Africa, and Latin America. These regions are favored because the tree is sensitive to frost and performs best in humid equatorial climates.

Harvesting is labor-intensive because latex is collected by tapping the bark, so labor availability, wage costs, and plantation management practices matter. Weather affects both yield and tapping schedules: heavy rain can disrupt collection, while drought can reduce latex flow and tree health. Disease pressure, including fungal and leaf diseases, can also affect output because monoculture plantations are vulnerable to biological shocks. Processing and transport infrastructure matter as well, since latex and sheet rubber must be moved quickly to preserve quality. Supply is therefore shaped by a combination of climate, labor, plantation age structure, and the long replacement cycle of tree crops.

Demand Drivers

Demand for rubber is dominated by transportation and industrial uses, especially tires for passenger vehicles, trucks, buses, motorcycles, and aircraft. Tire manufacturing is the largest end use because rubber provides grip, durability, and heat resistance. Natural rubber is often blended with synthetic rubber, carbon black, and other additives, so demand depends on the relative performance and price of substitute materials. When synthetic rubber becomes cheaper, manufacturers can adjust formulations, but natural rubber remains important where resilience, tear strength, and fatigue resistance are required.

Consumption also reflects broader industrial activity because rubber is used in belts, seals, vibration dampers, gloves, footwear, and a wide range of molded goods. Vehicle production, freight movement, road transport intensity, and replacement tire demand are key structural drivers. Seasonal factors can matter in some regions because tire replacement and industrial output vary with weather and driving patterns, but the larger influence is the global vehicle fleet and the expansion of road-based transport. Income growth tends to support rubber demand indirectly through higher vehicle ownership, freight volumes, and manufactured goods output. Environmental and efficiency standards can alter tire composition, but they usually change the mix of materials rather than eliminating rubber demand.

Macro and Financial Drivers

Rubber prices are influenced by the US dollar because benchmark contracts are commonly quoted in dollars, so exchange-rate changes affect purchasing power for non-dollar buyers. The commodity also responds to broader industrial cycles, especially manufacturing activity and transportation demand. Because rubber is storable but subject to quality loss and warehousing costs, carry economics matter: when nearby supply is ample, deferred contracts can trade at a premium that reflects storage and financing costs; when physical availability tightens, nearby prices can strengthen relative to later delivery months.

Interest rates affect the cost of holding inventories and financing trade flows, while inflation can influence input costs such as labor, energy, and transport. Rubber often trades with other industrial commodities through shared exposure to manufacturing activity, though its agricultural supply base gives it a distinct seasonal and biological component. It is less of a financial hedge than precious metals or energy, but it can still reflect broad risk sentiment when investors adjust exposure to cyclical raw materials.

MonthPriceChange
May 200330.92-
Jun 200331.391.52%
Jul 200330.36-3.27%
Aug 200331.874.98%
Sep 200333.976.57%
Oct 200339.1815.34%
Nov 200338.14-2.63%
Dec 200337.08-2.78%
Jan 200435.74-3.64%
Feb 200436.502.14%
Mar 200437.943.93%
Apr 200439.393.83%
May 200439.15-0.61%
Jun 200439.771.60%
Jul 200437.23-6.40%
Aug 200435.94-3.46%
Sep 200436.230.81%
Oct 200436.901.85%
Nov 200435.16-4.73%
Dec 200432.91-6.40%
Jan 200533.060.46%
Feb 200535.246.59%
Mar 200536.493.57%
Apr 200536.43-0.18%
May 200538.024.38%
Jun 200541.639.48%
Jul 200548.5016.51%
Aug 200545.58-6.02%
Sep 200548.255.85%
Oct 200548.550.64%
Nov 200546.04-5.17%
Dec 200548.395.10%
Jan 200653.089.68%
Feb 200658.089.42%
Mar 200657.66-0.72%
Apr 200658.972.28%
May 200666.2612.35%
Jun 200672.869.96%
Jul 200666.75-8.38%
Aug 200658.33-12.61%
Sep 200648.41-17.01%
Oct 200648.890.99%
Nov 200643.09-11.86%
Dec 200645.475.52%
Jan 200755.1821.36%
Feb 200760.018.76%
Mar 200758.22-2.99%
Apr 200759.862.81%
May 200761.192.23%
Jun 200757.79-5.56%
Jul 200753.13-8.08%
Aug 200754.071.79%
Sep 200754.510.81%
Oct 200757.996.38%
Nov 200760.644.58%
Dec 200760.950.50%
Jan 200864.185.30%
Feb 200868.376.53%
Mar 200866.22-3.15%
Apr 200866.800.87%
May 200872.378.34%
Jun 200876.115.17%
Jul 200874.71-1.83%
Aug 200870.87-5.14%
Sep 200871.530.92%
Oct 200850.75-29.05%
Nov 200845.15-11.04%
Dec 200833.82-25.09%
Jan 200948.9244.63%
Feb 200952.296.90%
Mar 200949.46-5.41%
Apr 200954.369.90%
May 200953.98-0.69%
Jun 200951.87-3.92%
Jul 200955.156.33%
Aug 200965.2718.35%
Sep 200966.782.32%
Oct 200969.183.60%
Nov 200973.446.15%
Dec 200984.1114.53%
Jan 201092.139.54%
Feb 201094.432.49%
Mar 201098.724.54%
Apr 2010115.2816.77%
May 2010111.96-2.88%
Jun 2010111.38-0.52%
Jul 2010100.24-10.01%
Aug 2010100.930.69%
Sep 2010108.757.74%
Oct 2010118.929.36%
Nov 2010133.3412.12%
Dec 2010146.559.91%
Jan 2011165.4612.91%
Feb 2011183.3010.78%
Mar 2011154.11-15.92%
Apr 2011164.176.53%
May 2011143.00-12.90%
Jun 2011137.95-3.53%
Jul 2011132.06-4.27%
Aug 2011134.571.90%
Sep 2011140.064.08%
Oct 2011126.91-9.39%
Nov 2011103.86-18.16%
Dec 2011106.502.54%
Jan 2012113.246.34%
Feb 2012119.285.33%
Mar 2012115.29-3.34%
Apr 2012113.27-1.76%
May 2012114.821.37%
Jun 2012105.25-8.33%
Jul 2012100.18-4.82%
Aug 201289.19-10.97%
Sep 201295.507.08%
Oct 201299.504.19%
Nov 201293.34-6.19%
Dec 201295.662.48%
Jan 201399.784.31%
Feb 201396.25-3.54%
Mar 201391.81-4.62%
Apr 201389.94-2.04%

Top Companies

Thai Rubber Latex Corporation
Website: http://www.thaitexgroup.com/
Location: Thailand
Estimated Production: 100000 tons per year

Commodities Market

  • Buyers: Request price quotes
  • Sellers: List your products
Sign up to get an email when we update our commodities data

 


Your email will never be shared, sold, nor rented. We hate SPAM as much you do.
Coming Soon