Rubber Monthly Price - Bahraini Dinar per Kilogram

Data as of March 2026

Range
Mar 2001 - Jan 2019: 0.384 (178.95%)
Chart

Description: Rubber (Asia), RSS3 grade, Singapore Commodity Exchange Ltd (SICOM) nearby contract beginning 2004; during 2000 to 2003, Singapore RSS1; previously Malaysia RSS1

Unit: Bahraini Dinar per Kilogram



Source: Singapore Exchange Ltd (SGX previously SICOM); Bloomberg; Rubber Association of Singapore Commodity Exchange (RASCE); International Rubber Study Group; Asian Wall Street Journal; World Bank.

See also: Agricultural production statistics

See also: Top commodity suppliers

See also: Commodities glossary - Definitions of terms used in commodity trading

Overview

Rubber in commodity markets usually refers to natural rubber, a plant-derived polymer harvested as latex from rubber trees and processed into standardized grades for trade. The most widely followed benchmark is RSS3, a ribbed smoked sheet grade quoted on the Singapore Commodity Exchange (SICOM) in US dollars per kilogram. Natural rubber is valued for its elasticity, tensile strength, and resistance to abrasion, which make it suitable for tires, conveyor belts, hoses, seals, footwear, and many industrial products. It is distinct from synthetic rubber, which is produced from petrochemical feedstocks, but the two are often close substitutes in many applications.

Prices are typically quoted by grade, delivery location, and contract month, with benchmark contracts used to hedge exposure to physical supply and manufacturing demand. Because rubber is an agricultural raw material, its market reflects both biological production constraints and industrial consumption patterns. The commodity is especially important to the tire industry, where performance requirements and cost considerations determine the balance between natural and synthetic rubber. Its pricing also reflects transport, processing, and quality differentials between producing regions and consuming centers.

Supply Drivers

Natural rubber supply is shaped by the biology of the rubber tree, which requires several years of growth before tapping begins and then produces latex over a long but finite productive life. This creates a lag between planting decisions and marketable output, so supply responds slowly to price signals. Production is concentrated in tropical regions with warm temperatures, high rainfall, and suitable soils, especially Southeast Asia, with additional output from parts of South Asia, West Africa, and Latin America. These regions are favored because the tree is sensitive to frost and performs best in humid equatorial climates.

Harvesting is labor-intensive because latex is collected by tapping the bark, so labor availability, wage costs, and plantation management practices matter. Weather affects both yield and tapping schedules: heavy rain can disrupt collection, while drought can reduce latex flow and tree health. Disease pressure, including fungal and leaf diseases, can also affect output because monoculture plantations are vulnerable to biological shocks. Processing and transport infrastructure matter as well, since latex and sheet rubber must be moved quickly to preserve quality. Supply is therefore shaped by a combination of climate, labor, plantation age structure, and the long replacement cycle of tree crops.

Demand Drivers

Demand for rubber is dominated by transportation and industrial uses, especially tires for passenger vehicles, trucks, buses, motorcycles, and aircraft. Tire manufacturing is the largest end use because rubber provides grip, durability, and heat resistance. Natural rubber is often blended with synthetic rubber, carbon black, and other additives, so demand depends on the relative performance and price of substitute materials. When synthetic rubber becomes cheaper, manufacturers can adjust formulations, but natural rubber remains important where resilience, tear strength, and fatigue resistance are required.

Consumption also reflects broader industrial activity because rubber is used in belts, seals, vibration dampers, gloves, footwear, and a wide range of molded goods. Vehicle production, freight movement, road transport intensity, and replacement tire demand are key structural drivers. Seasonal factors can matter in some regions because tire replacement and industrial output vary with weather and driving patterns, but the larger influence is the global vehicle fleet and the expansion of road-based transport. Income growth tends to support rubber demand indirectly through higher vehicle ownership, freight volumes, and manufactured goods output. Environmental and efficiency standards can alter tire composition, but they usually change the mix of materials rather than eliminating rubber demand.

Macro and Financial Drivers

Rubber prices are influenced by the US dollar because benchmark contracts are commonly quoted in dollars, so exchange-rate changes affect purchasing power for non-dollar buyers. The commodity also responds to broader industrial cycles, especially manufacturing activity and transportation demand. Because rubber is storable but subject to quality loss and warehousing costs, carry economics matter: when nearby supply is ample, deferred contracts can trade at a premium that reflects storage and financing costs; when physical availability tightens, nearby prices can strengthen relative to later delivery months.

Interest rates affect the cost of holding inventories and financing trade flows, while inflation can influence input costs such as labor, energy, and transport. Rubber often trades with other industrial commodities through shared exposure to manufacturing activity, though its agricultural supply base gives it a distinct seasonal and biological component. It is less of a financial hedge than precious metals or energy, but it can still reflect broad risk sentiment when investors adjust exposure to cyclical raw materials.

MonthPriceChange
Mar 2001.21-
Apr 2001.221.75%
May 2001.235.17%
Jun 2001.231.64%
Jul 2001.23-3.23%
Aug 2001.22-1.67%
Sep 2001.22-1.69%
Oct 2001.20-6.90%
Nov 2001.19-5.56%
Dec 2001.18-3.92%
Jan 2002.2116.33%
Feb 2002.238.77%
Mar 2002.258.06%
Apr 2002.250.00%
May 2002.264.48%
Jun 2002.3220.00%
Jul 2002.31-1.19%
Aug 2002.323.61%
Sep 2002.333.49%
Oct 2002.31-6.74%
Nov 2002.321.20%
Dec 2002.321.19%
Jan 2003.347.06%
Feb 2003.378.79%
Mar 2003.407.07%
Apr 2003.38-5.66%
May 2003.380.00%
Jun 2003.393.00%
Jul 2003.38-2.91%
Aug 2003.395.00%
Sep 2003.425.71%
Oct 2003.4917.12%
Nov 2003.48-1.54%
Dec 2003.47-1.56%
Jan 2004.47-1.59%
Feb 2004.483.23%
Mar 2004.503.91%
Apr 2004.523.01%
May 2004.51-1.46%
Jun 2004.521.48%
Jul 2004.48-6.57%
Aug 2004.46-3.91%
Sep 2004.470.81%
Oct 2004.482.42%
Nov 2004.46-3.15%
Dec 2004.44-4.07%
Jan 2005.440.00%
Feb 2005.476.78%
Mar 2005.504.76%
Apr 2005.49-0.76%
May 2005.513.82%
Jun 2005.557.35%
Jul 2005.6415.75%
Aug 2005.60-5.33%
Sep 2005.646.25%
Oct 2005.640.00%
Nov 2005.60-5.88%
Dec 2005.635.00%
Jan 2006.7111.90%
Feb 2006.779.57%
Mar 2006.780.49%
Apr 2006.803.38%
May 2006.9214.49%
Jun 20061.0210.20%
Jul 2006.93-8.15%
Aug 2006.82-12.10%
Sep 2006.68-16.97%
Oct 2006.680.55%
Nov 2006.61-10.99%
Dec 2006.656.79%
Jan 2007.7820.23%
Feb 2007.869.62%
Mar 2007.84-2.19%
Apr 2007.874.04%
May 2007.892.16%
Jun 2007.84-5.91%
Jul 2007.78-6.73%
Aug 2007.791.44%
Sep 2007.812.37%
Oct 2007.887.87%
Nov 2007.936.44%
Dec 2007.930.00%
Jan 2008.995.65%
Feb 20081.056.49%
Mar 20081.050.00%
Apr 20081.071.79%
May 20081.157.39%
Jun 20081.215.57%
Jul 20081.20-0.62%
Aug 20081.10-8.44%
Sep 20081.06-3.41%
Oct 2008.72-32.16%
Nov 2008.62-14.06%
Dec 2008.45-27.27%
Jan 2009.5624.17%
Feb 2009.55-2.01%
Mar 2009.54-2.05%
Apr 2009.6113.29%
May 2009.644.32%
Jun 2009.63-1.18%
Jul 2009.664.79%
Aug 2009.7717.71%
Sep 2009.825.34%
Oct 2009.888.29%
Nov 2009.968.09%
Dec 20091.0510.24%
Jan 20101.1610.36%
Feb 20101.181.29%
Mar 20101.266.71%
Apr 20101.4918.26%
May 20101.38-7.09%
Jun 20101.34-2.72%
Jul 20101.23-8.40%
Aug 20101.251.53%
Sep 20101.336.33%
Oct 20101.4711.05%
Nov 20101.629.95%
Dec 20101.7910.21%
Jan 20112.0816.21%
Feb 20112.3513.41%
Mar 20112.04-13.42%
Apr 20112.207.93%
May 20111.93-12.48%
Jun 20111.85-3.71%
Jul 20111.78-4.06%
Aug 20111.76-1.06%
Sep 20111.71-2.78%
Oct 20111.53-10.77%
Nov 20111.27-17.00%
Dec 20111.270.30%
Jan 20121.367.40%
Feb 20121.5010.19%
Mar 20121.48-1.75%
Apr 20121.44-2.29%
May 20121.40-2.86%
Jun 20121.20-14.21%
Jul 20121.16-3.75%
Aug 20121.05-9.42%
Sep 20121.148.96%
Oct 20121.205.26%
Nov 20121.12-7.19%
Dec 20121.174.71%
Jan 20131.246.11%
Feb 20131.20-3.33%
Mar 20131.12-6.58%
Apr 20131.08-3.69%
May 20131.145.92%
Jun 20131.06-7.57%
Jul 2013.96-8.90%
Aug 2013.970.39%
Sep 2013.992.72%
Oct 2013.95-4.17%
Nov 2013.94-1.58%
Dec 2013.962.81%
Jan 2014.88-8.59%
Feb 2014.82-7.26%
Mar 2014.865.53%
Apr 2014.81-6.11%
May 2014.76-6.05%
Jun 2014.770.99%
Jul 2014.75-1.96%
Aug 2014.70-7.00%
Sep 2014.63-10.22%
Oct 2014.61-2.40%
Nov 2014.620.61%
Dec 2014.61-1.83%
Jan 2015.623.11%
Feb 2015.689.64%
Mar 2015.65-4.40%
Apr 2015.64-2.28%
May 2015.698.22%
Jun 2015.68-1.09%
Jul 2015.62-9.89%
Aug 2015.55-11.59%
Sep 2015.51-6.90%
Oct 2015.50-1.48%
Nov 2015.47-6.77%
Dec 2015.482.42%
Jan 2016.46-3.15%
Feb 2016.483.25%
Mar 2016.5514.96%
Apr 2016.6417.12%
May 2016.61-4.68%
Jun 2016.56-8.59%
Jul 2016.606.71%
Aug 2016.58-2.52%
Sep 2016.591.29%
Oct 2016.625.73%
Nov 2016.7012.65%
Dec 2016.8419.25%
Jan 2017.9614.80%
Feb 20171.025.86%
Mar 2017.88-13.28%
Apr 2017.83-5.96%
May 2017.79-4.98%
Jun 2017.65-18.10%
Jul 2017.661.74%
Aug 2017.695.14%
Sep 2017.701.09%
Oct 2017.62-11.83%
Nov 2017.59-4.27%
Dec 2017.625.10%
Jan 2018.654.24%
Feb 2018.650.00%
Mar 2018.662.33%
Apr 2018.65-1.70%
May 2018.64-1.73%
Jun 2018.59-8.24%
Jul 2018.55-5.77%
Aug 2018.550.00%
Sep 2018.54-2.04%
Oct 2018.54-0.69%
Nov 2018.51-5.59%
Dec 2018.546.67%
Jan 2019.6010.42%

Top Companies

Thai Rubber Latex Corporation
Website: http://www.thaitexgroup.com/
Location: Thailand
Estimated Production: 100000 tons per year

Commodities Market

  • Buyers: Request price quotes
  • Sellers: List your products
Sign up to get an email when we update our commodities data

 


Your email will never be shared, sold, nor rented. We hate SPAM as much you do.
Coming Soon