Indonesian Liquified Natural Gas Monthly Price - Pakistan Rupee per Million Metric British Thermal Unit

Data as of March 2026

Range
Apr 2006 - Jan 2019: 1,251.359 (301.03%)
Chart

Description: Natural gas LNG (Japan), import price, cif, recent two months' averages are estimates.

Unit: Pakistan Rupee per Million Metric British Thermal Unit



Source: World Gas Intelligence; World Bank.

See also: Energy production and consumption statistics

See also: Top commodity suppliers

See also: Commodities glossary - Definitions of terms used in commodity trading

Overview

Indonesian liquefied natural gas (LNG) is natural gas cooled to a liquid state for marine transport and regasification at destination terminals. In commodity markets, it is commonly referenced through contract prices for deliveries to Japan, quoted in U.S. dollars per million British thermal units (MMBtu). This pricing convention reflects the energy content of the cargo rather than its volume, which makes it comparable with pipeline gas and other LNG benchmarks. Indonesian LNG is typically associated with long-term export contracts and Asian import demand, especially in Japan, where LNG has long served as a flexible fuel for power generation, industrial heat, and city gas supply. Because LNG is a traded gas rather than a refined product, its market value is shaped by liquefaction costs, shipping distance, destination terminal access, and the broader balance between regional gas supply and demand. It also competes with other gaseous and liquid fuels in power and industrial applications, making it an important reference point for gas-market analysis.

Supply Drivers

Supply is shaped by the geology of natural gas fields, the pace of reservoir depletion, and the capital intensity of liquefaction infrastructure. Indonesia’s LNG export capacity depends on upstream gas production from mature basins and offshore fields, where output can decline without continued drilling and field maintenance. LNG supply is also constrained by the long lead times required to develop gas discoveries, build liquefaction trains, and secure export terminals, pipelines, and storage. Because LNG must be chilled, loaded, shipped, and regasified, any bottleneck in the chain can limit effective supply even when gas is available underground.

Indonesia’s tropical climate and archipelagic geography add transport complexity, making pipeline gathering systems, coastal terminals, and shipping logistics especially important. Maintenance outages, reservoir pressure decline, and the need for compression or enhanced recovery can all affect export availability. Unlike seasonal agricultural commodities, LNG supply is not harvested, but it is still cyclical because gas fields and liquefaction plants undergo planned maintenance and because upstream production responds slowly to price signals. Long-term supply is therefore governed by resource quality, infrastructure reliability, and the economics of replacing declining reserves.

Demand Drivers

Demand for Indonesian LNG is driven primarily by power generation, industrial fuel use, and city gas systems in importing countries, especially in East Asia. Japan has historically relied on LNG because it is a low-emission combustion fuel relative to coal and oil and because it can be delivered by ship to an island market without domestic pipeline links to major gas basins. LNG is also used as a balancing fuel in electricity systems, where it supports peak demand and complements intermittent generation from wind and solar. This makes demand sensitive to weather, electricity load, and the availability of competing fuels.

Substitution is an important feature of LNG demand. In power and industrial boilers, LNG competes with coal, fuel oil, and in some cases pipeline gas. In regions with flexible generation fleets, relative fuel prices influence dispatch decisions and contract renewals. Demand also reflects broader industrial activity, since gas is used in chemicals, refining, metals, and manufacturing. Seasonal heating demand matters in colder importing markets, while summer electricity demand can lift gas burn in warmer regions. Over the long run, efficiency improvements, electrification, and changes in power-generation technology shape consumption patterns, but LNG remains structurally important where secure maritime supply and flexible fuel switching are valued.

Macro and Financial Drivers

As a dollar-denominated energy commodity, Indonesian LNG is influenced by the U.S. dollar exchange rate: a stronger dollar tends to raise local-currency costs for importers and can affect demand at the margin. LNG pricing also responds to interest rates and financing conditions because liquefaction plants, shipping fleets, and terminal infrastructure require large upfront capital expenditures. Storage and transport costs matter as well, since LNG must remain in specialized tanks and carriers, and the economics of moving cargoes across oceans affect regional price differentials.

Like other energy commodities, LNG can exhibit contango or backwardation depending on the balance between immediate supply tightness and future availability. Because LNG is difficult and costly to store relative to many physical commodities, nearby contract pricing can be sensitive to shipping constraints, terminal outages, and seasonal demand swings. Broader macroeconomic activity matters through industrial gas consumption, while correlations with crude oil and coal often arise because these fuels compete in power generation and long-term contract pricing formulas.

MonthPriceChange
Apr 2006415.69-
May 2006415.66-0.01%
Jun 2006427.322.80%
Jul 2006413.58-3.21%
Aug 2006436.165.46%
Sep 2006462.736.09%
Oct 2006436.22-5.73%
Nov 2006437.720.34%
Dec 2006447.552.25%
Jan 2007433.00-3.25%
Feb 2007418.79-3.28%
Mar 2007416.44-0.56%
Apr 2007430.573.39%
May 2007437.991.72%
Jun 2007431.21-1.55%
Jul 2007438.681.73%
Aug 2007465.806.18%
Sep 2007490.465.30%
Oct 2007518.865.79%
Nov 2007557.357.42%
Dec 2007562.010.84%
Jan 2008608.538.28%
Feb 2008640.375.23%
Mar 2008672.244.98%
Apr 2008727.878.28%
May 2008788.578.34%
Jun 2008813.113.11%
Jul 2008875.007.61%
Aug 2008987.8712.90%
Sep 20081,112.9112.66%
Oct 20081,205.898.35%
Nov 20081,204.84-0.09%
Dec 20081,089.82-9.55%
Jan 20091,007.38-7.57%
Feb 2009837.30-16.88%
Mar 2009762.20-8.97%
Apr 2009653.98-14.20%
May 2009605.02-7.49%
Jun 2009582.40-3.74%
Jul 2009621.056.64%
Aug 2009643.323.59%
Sep 2009698.418.56%
Oct 2009758.078.54%
Nov 2009762.910.64%
Dec 2009821.117.63%
Jan 2010848.123.29%
Feb 2010893.985.41%
Mar 2010880.01-1.56%
Apr 2010922.214.80%
May 2010961.094.22%
Jun 2010894.65-6.91%
Jul 2010968.958.31%
Aug 2010968.15-0.08%
Sep 2010947.04-2.18%
Oct 2010957.311.08%
Nov 2010927.93-3.07%
Dec 2010922.10-0.63%
Jan 2011981.916.49%
Feb 20111,026.334.52%
Mar 20111,067.514.01%
Apr 20111,100.053.05%
May 20111,159.885.44%
Jun 20111,246.517.47%
Jul 20111,396.4512.03%
Aug 20111,434.722.74%
Sep 20111,423.96-0.75%
Oct 20111,432.810.62%
Nov 20111,459.001.83%
Dec 20111,473.500.99%
Jan 20121,508.842.40%
Feb 20121,454.62-3.59%
Mar 20121,483.812.01%
Apr 20121,528.673.02%
May 20121,562.252.20%
Jun 20121,621.543.79%
Jul 20121,710.755.50%
Aug 20121,677.07-1.97%
Sep 20121,592.91-5.02%
Oct 20121,460.01-8.34%
Nov 20121,441.11-1.29%
Dec 20121,499.154.03%
Jan 20131,550.243.41%
Feb 20131,614.714.16%
Mar 20131,596.86-1.11%
Apr 20131,593.94-0.18%
May 20131,597.020.19%
Jun 20131,639.062.63%
Jul 20131,628.37-0.65%
Aug 20131,608.32-1.23%
Sep 20131,577.84-1.89%
Oct 20131,627.023.12%
Nov 20131,656.291.80%
Dec 20131,754.435.93%
Jan 20141,758.730.25%
Feb 20141,762.760.23%
Mar 20141,652.92-6.23%
Apr 20141,640.07-0.78%
May 20141,611.26-1.76%
Jun 20141,590.12-1.31%
Jul 20141,502.52-5.51%
Aug 20141,579.615.13%
Sep 20141,554.52-1.59%
Oct 20141,635.255.19%
Nov 20141,589.27-2.81%
Dec 20141,576.90-0.78%
Jan 20151,632.733.54%
Feb 20151,441.71-11.70%
Mar 20151,328.40-7.86%
Apr 20151,113.09-16.21%
May 2015951.53-14.51%
Jun 2015935.87-1.65%
Jul 2015966.903.32%
Aug 20151,006.094.05%
Sep 20151,075.996.95%
Oct 20151,057.62-1.71%
Nov 20151,004.39-5.03%
Dec 2015951.51-5.27%
Jan 2016881.45-7.36%
Feb 2016896.411.70%
Mar 2016810.69-9.56%
Apr 2016714.47-11.87%
May 2016656.90-8.06%
Jun 2016669.961.99%
Jul 2016708.815.80%
Aug 2016747.835.50%
Sep 2016789.135.52%
Oct 2016801.191.53%
Nov 2016795.51-0.71%
Dec 2016795.720.03%
Jan 2017843.025.94%
Feb 2017881.664.58%
Mar 2017865.05-1.88%
Apr 2017918.536.18%
May 2017954.153.88%
Jun 2017931.33-2.39%
Jul 2017935.790.48%
Aug 2017940.140.46%
Sep 2017910.76-3.12%
Oct 2017876.10-3.81%
Nov 2017891.031.70%
Dec 2017943.385.88%
Jan 20181,032.549.45%
Feb 20181,086.815.26%
Mar 20181,133.744.32%
Apr 20181,166.442.88%
May 20181,185.051.60%
Jun 20181,246.755.21%
Jul 20181,305.424.71%
Aug 20181,349.983.41%
Sep 20181,404.014.00%
Oct 20181,529.638.95%
Nov 20181,566.652.42%
Dec 20181,664.506.25%
Jan 20191,667.050.15%

Top Companies

Royal Dutch Shell
Website: http://www.shell.com/
Location: Hague, Netherlands
Estimated Production: 3.5 million tonnes per year

Commodities Market

  • Buyers: Request price quotes
  • Sellers: List your products
Sign up to get an email when we update our commodities data

 


Your email will never be shared, sold, nor rented. We hate SPAM as much you do.
Coming Soon