Indonesian Liquified Natural Gas Monthly Price - Forint per Million Metric British Thermal Unit

Data as of March 2026

Range
Apr 2006 - Jan 2019: 1,876.941 (125.20%)
Chart

Description: Natural gas LNG (Japan), import price, cif, recent two months' averages are estimates.

Unit: Forint per Million Metric British Thermal Unit



Source: World Gas Intelligence; World Bank.

See also: Energy production and consumption statistics

See also: Top commodity suppliers

See also: Commodities glossary - Definitions of terms used in commodity trading

Overview

Indonesian liquefied natural gas (LNG) is natural gas cooled to a liquid state for marine transport and regasification at destination terminals. In commodity markets, it is commonly referenced through contract prices for deliveries to Japan, quoted in U.S. dollars per million British thermal units (MMBtu). This pricing convention reflects the energy content of the cargo rather than its volume, which makes it comparable with pipeline gas and other LNG benchmarks. Indonesian LNG is typically associated with long-term export contracts and Asian import demand, especially in Japan, where LNG has long served as a flexible fuel for power generation, industrial heat, and city gas supply. Because LNG is a traded gas rather than a refined product, its market value is shaped by liquefaction costs, shipping distance, destination terminal access, and the broader balance between regional gas supply and demand. It also competes with other gaseous and liquid fuels in power and industrial applications, making it an important reference point for gas-market analysis.

Supply Drivers

Supply is shaped by the geology of natural gas fields, the pace of reservoir depletion, and the capital intensity of liquefaction infrastructure. Indonesia’s LNG export capacity depends on upstream gas production from mature basins and offshore fields, where output can decline without continued drilling and field maintenance. LNG supply is also constrained by the long lead times required to develop gas discoveries, build liquefaction trains, and secure export terminals, pipelines, and storage. Because LNG must be chilled, loaded, shipped, and regasified, any bottleneck in the chain can limit effective supply even when gas is available underground.

Indonesia’s tropical climate and archipelagic geography add transport complexity, making pipeline gathering systems, coastal terminals, and shipping logistics especially important. Maintenance outages, reservoir pressure decline, and the need for compression or enhanced recovery can all affect export availability. Unlike seasonal agricultural commodities, LNG supply is not harvested, but it is still cyclical because gas fields and liquefaction plants undergo planned maintenance and because upstream production responds slowly to price signals. Long-term supply is therefore governed by resource quality, infrastructure reliability, and the economics of replacing declining reserves.

Demand Drivers

Demand for Indonesian LNG is driven primarily by power generation, industrial fuel use, and city gas systems in importing countries, especially in East Asia. Japan has historically relied on LNG because it is a low-emission combustion fuel relative to coal and oil and because it can be delivered by ship to an island market without domestic pipeline links to major gas basins. LNG is also used as a balancing fuel in electricity systems, where it supports peak demand and complements intermittent generation from wind and solar. This makes demand sensitive to weather, electricity load, and the availability of competing fuels.

Substitution is an important feature of LNG demand. In power and industrial boilers, LNG competes with coal, fuel oil, and in some cases pipeline gas. In regions with flexible generation fleets, relative fuel prices influence dispatch decisions and contract renewals. Demand also reflects broader industrial activity, since gas is used in chemicals, refining, metals, and manufacturing. Seasonal heating demand matters in colder importing markets, while summer electricity demand can lift gas burn in warmer regions. Over the long run, efficiency improvements, electrification, and changes in power-generation technology shape consumption patterns, but LNG remains structurally important where secure maritime supply and flexible fuel switching are valued.

Macro and Financial Drivers

As a dollar-denominated energy commodity, Indonesian LNG is influenced by the U.S. dollar exchange rate: a stronger dollar tends to raise local-currency costs for importers and can affect demand at the margin. LNG pricing also responds to interest rates and financing conditions because liquefaction plants, shipping fleets, and terminal infrastructure require large upfront capital expenditures. Storage and transport costs matter as well, since LNG must remain in specialized tanks and carriers, and the economics of moving cargoes across oceans affect regional price differentials.

Like other energy commodities, LNG can exhibit contango or backwardation depending on the balance between immediate supply tightness and future availability. Because LNG is difficult and costly to store relative to many physical commodities, nearby contract pricing can be sensitive to shipping constraints, terminal outages, and seasonal demand swings. Broader macroeconomic activity matters through industrial gas consumption, while correlations with crude oil and coal often arise because these fuels compete in power generation and long-term contract pricing formulas.

MonthPriceChange
Apr 20061,499.10-
May 20061,422.08-5.14%
Jun 20061,525.757.29%
Jul 20061,501.02-1.62%
Aug 20061,547.113.07%
Sep 20061,650.156.66%
Oct 20061,525.18-7.57%
Nov 20061,449.21-4.98%
Dec 20061,413.14-2.49%
Jan 20071,390.01-1.64%
Feb 20071,335.75-3.90%
Mar 20071,294.77-3.07%
Apr 20071,290.94-0.30%
May 20071,327.332.82%
Jun 20071,327.390.00%
Jul 20071,306.50-1.57%
Aug 20071,442.4710.41%
Sep 20071,475.952.32%
Oct 20071,507.292.12%
Nov 20071,582.544.99%
Dec 20071,596.050.85%
Jan 20081,730.658.43%
Feb 20081,858.647.40%
Mar 20081,836.50-1.19%
Apr 20081,838.950.13%
May 20081,847.760.48%
Jun 20081,881.971.85%
Jul 20081,816.23-3.49%
Aug 20082,086.2714.87%
Sep 20082,409.3615.49%
Oct 20082,900.3720.38%
Nov 20083,135.738.12%
Dec 20082,711.59-13.53%
Jan 20092,690.64-0.77%
Feb 20092,454.76-8.77%
Mar 20092,213.99-9.81%
Apr 20091,816.45-17.96%
May 20091,549.38-14.70%
Jun 20091,437.94-7.19%
Jul 20091,459.211.48%
Aug 20091,467.380.56%
Sep 20091,573.167.21%
Oct 20091,650.794.93%
Nov 20091,657.970.43%
Dec 20091,822.749.94%
Jan 20101,889.353.65%
Feb 20102,085.1910.37%
Mar 20102,038.90-2.22%
Apr 20102,170.276.44%
May 20102,500.3815.21%
Jun 20102,413.62-3.47%
Jul 20102,515.304.21%
Aug 20102,459.96-2.20%
Sep 20102,378.02-3.33%
Oct 20102,198.95-7.53%
Nov 20102,168.89-1.37%
Dec 20102,254.493.95%
Jan 20112,361.414.74%
Feb 20112,388.101.13%
Mar 20112,414.531.11%
Apr 20112,384.69-1.24%
May 20112,528.586.03%
Jun 20112,690.766.41%
Jul 20113,043.4613.11%
Aug 20113,139.573.16%
Sep 20113,371.147.38%
Oct 20113,569.005.87%
Nov 20113,824.827.17%
Dec 20113,804.92-0.52%
Jan 20123,967.704.28%
Feb 20123,521.01-11.26%
Mar 20123,610.462.54%
Apr 20123,786.084.86%
May 20123,916.173.44%
Jun 20124,031.452.94%
Jul 20124,223.334.76%
Aug 20123,987.53-5.58%
Sep 20123,714.50-6.85%
Oct 20123,326.44-10.45%
Nov 20123,313.26-0.40%
Dec 20123,352.091.17%
Jan 20133,511.914.77%
Feb 20133,601.782.56%
Mar 20133,806.225.68%
Apr 20133,718.40-2.31%
May 20133,656.21-1.67%
Jun 20133,724.541.87%
Jul 20133,641.97-2.22%
Aug 20133,508.38-3.67%
Sep 20133,361.61-4.18%
Oct 20133,308.97-1.57%
Nov 20133,398.822.72%
Dec 20133,599.265.90%
Jan 20143,698.132.75%
Feb 20143,807.472.96%
Mar 20143,732.30-1.97%
Apr 20143,735.910.10%
May 20143,616.30-3.20%
Jun 20143,630.430.39%
Jul 20143,478.67-4.18%
Aug 20143,708.746.61%
Sep 20143,680.49-0.76%
Oct 20143,858.184.83%
Nov 20143,837.00-0.55%
Dec 20143,929.982.42%
Jan 20154,413.0712.29%
Feb 20153,839.25-13.00%
Mar 20153,653.23-4.85%
Apr 20153,040.80-16.76%
May 20152,562.35-15.73%
Jun 20152,558.20-0.16%
Jul 20152,689.155.12%
Aug 20152,747.532.17%
Sep 20152,871.244.50%
Oct 20152,801.46-2.43%
Nov 20152,765.24-1.29%
Dec 20152,624.07-5.11%
Jan 20162,433.96-7.24%
Feb 20162,394.07-1.64%
Mar 20162,170.93-9.32%
Apr 20161,873.73-13.69%
May 20161,742.07-7.03%
Jun 20161,786.392.54%
Jul 20161,921.197.55%
Aug 20161,976.752.89%
Sep 20162,075.705.01%
Oct 20162,130.052.62%
Nov 20162,166.281.70%
Dec 20162,244.913.63%
Jan 20172,338.634.17%
Feb 20172,437.934.25%
Mar 20172,390.21-1.96%
Apr 20172,544.226.44%
May 20172,554.750.41%
Jun 20172,439.38-4.52%
Jul 20172,361.04-3.21%
Aug 20172,297.63-2.69%
Sep 20172,236.45-2.66%
Oct 20172,188.57-2.14%
Nov 20172,246.202.63%
Dec 20172,289.741.94%
Jan 20182,371.313.56%
Feb 20182,479.764.57%
Mar 20182,560.763.27%
Apr 20182,561.320.02%
May 20182,741.927.05%
Jun 20182,885.175.22%
Jul 20182,901.190.56%
Aug 20183,041.984.85%
Sep 20183,145.713.41%
Oct 20183,288.024.52%
Nov 20183,322.331.04%
Dec 20183,403.472.44%
Jan 20193,376.04-0.81%

Top Companies

Royal Dutch Shell
Website: http://www.shell.com/
Location: Hague, Netherlands
Estimated Production: 3.5 million tonnes per year

Commodities Market

  • Buyers: Request price quotes
  • Sellers: List your products
Sign up to get an email when we update our commodities data

 


Your email will never be shared, sold, nor rented. We hate SPAM as much you do.
Coming Soon