Indonesian Liquified Natural Gas Monthly Price - Bahraini Dinar per Million Metric British Thermal Unit

Data as of March 2026

Range
Mar 2001 - Jan 2019: 2.685 (146.61%)
Chart

Description: Natural gas LNG (Japan), import price, cif, recent two months' averages are estimates.

Unit: Bahraini Dinar per Million Metric British Thermal Unit



Source: World Gas Intelligence; World Bank.

See also: Energy production and consumption statistics

See also: Top commodity suppliers

See also: Commodities glossary - Definitions of terms used in commodity trading

Overview

Indonesian liquefied natural gas (LNG) is natural gas cooled to a liquid state for marine transport and regasification at destination terminals. In commodity markets, it is commonly referenced through contract prices for deliveries to Japan, quoted in U.S. dollars per million British thermal units (MMBtu). This pricing convention reflects the energy content of the cargo rather than its volume, which makes it comparable with pipeline gas and other LNG benchmarks. Indonesian LNG is typically associated with long-term export contracts and Asian import demand, especially in Japan, where LNG has long served as a flexible fuel for power generation, industrial heat, and city gas supply. Because LNG is a traded gas rather than a refined product, its market value is shaped by liquefaction costs, shipping distance, destination terminal access, and the broader balance between regional gas supply and demand. It also competes with other gaseous and liquid fuels in power and industrial applications, making it an important reference point for gas-market analysis.

Supply Drivers

Supply is shaped by the geology of natural gas fields, the pace of reservoir depletion, and the capital intensity of liquefaction infrastructure. Indonesia’s LNG export capacity depends on upstream gas production from mature basins and offshore fields, where output can decline without continued drilling and field maintenance. LNG supply is also constrained by the long lead times required to develop gas discoveries, build liquefaction trains, and secure export terminals, pipelines, and storage. Because LNG must be chilled, loaded, shipped, and regasified, any bottleneck in the chain can limit effective supply even when gas is available underground.

Indonesia’s tropical climate and archipelagic geography add transport complexity, making pipeline gathering systems, coastal terminals, and shipping logistics especially important. Maintenance outages, reservoir pressure decline, and the need for compression or enhanced recovery can all affect export availability. Unlike seasonal agricultural commodities, LNG supply is not harvested, but it is still cyclical because gas fields and liquefaction plants undergo planned maintenance and because upstream production responds slowly to price signals. Long-term supply is therefore governed by resource quality, infrastructure reliability, and the economics of replacing declining reserves.

Demand Drivers

Demand for Indonesian LNG is driven primarily by power generation, industrial fuel use, and city gas systems in importing countries, especially in East Asia. Japan has historically relied on LNG because it is a low-emission combustion fuel relative to coal and oil and because it can be delivered by ship to an island market without domestic pipeline links to major gas basins. LNG is also used as a balancing fuel in electricity systems, where it supports peak demand and complements intermittent generation from wind and solar. This makes demand sensitive to weather, electricity load, and the availability of competing fuels.

Substitution is an important feature of LNG demand. In power and industrial boilers, LNG competes with coal, fuel oil, and in some cases pipeline gas. In regions with flexible generation fleets, relative fuel prices influence dispatch decisions and contract renewals. Demand also reflects broader industrial activity, since gas is used in chemicals, refining, metals, and manufacturing. Seasonal heating demand matters in colder importing markets, while summer electricity demand can lift gas burn in warmer regions. Over the long run, efficiency improvements, electrification, and changes in power-generation technology shape consumption patterns, but LNG remains structurally important where secure maritime supply and flexible fuel switching are valued.

Macro and Financial Drivers

As a dollar-denominated energy commodity, Indonesian LNG is influenced by the U.S. dollar exchange rate: a stronger dollar tends to raise local-currency costs for importers and can affect demand at the margin. LNG pricing also responds to interest rates and financing conditions because liquefaction plants, shipping fleets, and terminal infrastructure require large upfront capital expenditures. Storage and transport costs matter as well, since LNG must remain in specialized tanks and carriers, and the economics of moving cargoes across oceans affect regional price differentials.

Like other energy commodities, LNG can exhibit contango or backwardation depending on the balance between immediate supply tightness and future availability. Because LNG is difficult and costly to store relative to many physical commodities, nearby contract pricing can be sensitive to shipping constraints, terminal outages, and seasonal demand swings. Broader macroeconomic activity matters through industrial gas consumption, while correlations with crude oil and coal often arise because these fuels compete in power generation and long-term contract pricing formulas.

MonthPriceChange
Mar 20011.83-
Apr 20011.78-2.87%
May 20011.75-1.48%
Jun 20011.760.64%
Jul 20011.75-0.64%
Aug 20011.71-2.58%
Sep 20011.710.00%
Oct 20011.731.10%
Nov 20011.65-4.58%
Dec 20011.61-2.51%
Jan 20021.58-1.41%
Feb 20021.55-2.14%
Mar 20021.50-3.16%
Apr 20021.49-0.75%
May 20021.511.26%
Jun 20021.531.25%
Jul 20021.7112.32%
Aug 20021.64-4.61%
Sep 20021.682.53%
Oct 20021.711.79%
Nov 20021.710.44%
Dec 20021.710.00%
Jan 20031.762.85%
Feb 20031.802.35%
Mar 20031.80-0.42%
Apr 20031.800.00%
May 20031.78-0.84%
Jun 20031.790.63%
Jul 20031.79-0.42%
Aug 20031.76-1.68%
Sep 20031.770.64%
Oct 20031.74-1.70%
Nov 20031.772.16%
Dec 20031.790.64%
Jan 20041.790.00%
Feb 20041.811.26%
Mar 20041.831.46%
Apr 20041.850.61%
May 20041.850.00%
Jun 20041.902.65%
Jul 20041.910.60%
Aug 20041.941.78%
Sep 20042.045.23%
Oct 20042.092.21%
Nov 20042.05-1.80%
Dec 20042.092.20%
Jan 20052.04-2.69%
Feb 20052.102.95%
Mar 20052.100.18%
Apr 20052.131.43%
May 20052.161.23%
Jun 20052.14-1.05%
Jul 20052.276.16%
Aug 20052.332.82%
Sep 20052.403.06%
Oct 20052.441.41%
Nov 20052.492.01%
Dec 20052.44-1.82%
Jan 20062.460.62%
Feb 20062.657.81%
Mar 20062.59-2.27%
Apr 20062.610.73%
May 20062.60-0.14%
Jun 20062.672.60%
Jul 20062.58-3.38%
Aug 20062.725.39%
Sep 20062.885.81%
Oct 20062.71-5.88%
Nov 20062.710.14%
Dec 20062.761.94%
Jan 20072.67-3.27%
Feb 20072.59-3.09%
Mar 20072.58-0.44%
Apr 20072.673.35%
May 20072.711.83%
Jun 20072.67-1.52%
Jul 20072.732.11%
Aug 20072.906.06%
Sep 20073.045.06%
Oct 20073.215.69%
Nov 20073.446.90%
Dec 20073.450.44%
Jan 20083.748.28%
Feb 20083.935.23%
Mar 20084.124.78%
Apr 20084.294.20%
May 20084.371.84%
Jun 20084.543.78%
Jul 20084.642.32%
Aug 20084.987.29%
Sep 20085.418.60%
Oct 20085.644.31%
Nov 20085.660.33%
Dec 20085.18-8.50%
Jan 20094.78-7.76%
Feb 20093.96-17.23%
Mar 20093.56-9.89%
Apr 20093.05-14.35%
May 20092.82-7.64%
Jun 20092.70-4.27%
Jul 20092.845.15%
Aug 20092.922.78%
Sep 20093.178.51%
Oct 20093.428.08%
Nov 20093.430.33%
Dec 20093.676.90%
Jan 20103.772.66%
Feb 20103.964.99%
Mar 20103.92-0.95%
Apr 20104.135.37%
May 20104.283.73%
Jun 20103.94-7.99%
Jul 20104.268.02%
Aug 20104.25-0.18%
Sep 20104.15-2.39%
Oct 20104.180.91%
Nov 20104.08-2.61%
Dec 20104.04-0.83%
Jan 20114.316.51%
Feb 20114.524.98%
Mar 20114.703.99%
Apr 20114.883.92%
May 20115.124.77%
Jun 20115.466.69%
Jul 20116.1011.71%
Aug 20116.222.03%
Sep 20116.12-1.69%
Oct 20116.201.29%
Nov 20116.311.82%
Dec 20116.20-1.79%
Jan 20126.281.40%
Feb 20126.03-4.07%
Mar 20126.141.93%
Apr 20126.343.12%
May 20126.441.60%
Jun 20126.470.47%
Jul 20126.815.29%
Aug 20126.67-2.04%
Sep 20126.33-5.13%
Oct 20125.75-9.09%
Nov 20125.64-1.96%
Dec 20125.792.73%
Jan 20135.973.11%
Feb 20136.193.65%
Mar 20136.12-1.21%
Apr 20136.09-0.43%
May 20136.100.12%
Jun 20136.252.40%
Jul 20136.08-2.65%
Aug 20135.87-3.53%
Sep 20135.62-4.10%
Oct 20135.752.27%
Nov 20135.790.65%
Dec 20136.166.36%
Jan 20146.271.77%
Feb 20146.300.54%
Mar 20146.22-1.25%
Apr 20146.311.45%
May 20146.14-2.80%
Jun 20146.06-1.16%
Jul 20145.72-5.70%
Aug 20145.923.48%
Sep 20145.70-3.68%
Oct 20145.974.82%
Nov 20145.86-1.89%
Dec 20145.870.19%
Jan 20156.093.65%
Feb 20155.34-12.29%
Mar 20154.90-8.17%
Apr 20154.11-16.13%
May 20153.51-14.60%
Jun 20153.46-1.61%
Jul 20153.573.37%
Aug 20153.693.37%
Sep 20153.884.99%
Oct 20153.80-1.94%
Nov 20153.58-5.84%
Dec 20153.41-4.62%
Jan 20163.16-7.49%
Feb 20163.221.90%
Mar 20162.91-9.58%
Apr 20162.56-11.89%
May 20162.36-8.06%
Jun 20162.412.07%
Jul 20162.545.62%
Aug 20162.685.62%
Sep 20162.845.60%
Oct 20162.881.46%
Nov 20162.85-0.78%
Dec 20162.850.00%
Jan 20173.025.93%
Feb 20173.164.60%
Mar 20173.10-1.90%
Apr 20173.296.18%
May 20173.423.88%
Jun 20173.34-2.42%
Jul 20173.33-0.23%
Aug 20173.350.68%
Sep 20173.25-3.14%
Oct 20173.12-3.82%
Nov 20173.181.68%
Dec 20173.252.37%
Jan 20183.517.98%
Feb 20183.705.25%
Mar 20183.802.85%
Apr 20183.79-0.20%
May 20183.851.59%
Jun 20183.931.85%
Jul 20183.930.00%
Aug 20184.094.21%
Sep 20184.253.86%
Oct 20184.383.19%
Nov 20184.400.34%
Dec 20184.512.56%
Jan 20194.520.08%

Top Companies

Royal Dutch Shell
Website: http://www.shell.com/
Location: Hague, Netherlands
Estimated Production: 3.5 million tonnes per year

Commodities Market

  • Buyers: Request price quotes
  • Sellers: List your products
Sign up to get an email when we update our commodities data

 


Your email will never be shared, sold, nor rented. We hate SPAM as much you do.
Coming Soon