DAP fertilizer Monthly Price - Pakistan Rupee per Metric Ton

Data as of March 2026

Range
Apr 2006 - Jan 2019: 39,140.260 (281.55%)
Chart

Description: DAP (diammonium phosphate), standard size, bulk, spot, f.o.b. US Gulf

Unit: Pakistan Rupee per Metric Ton



Source: Fertilizer Week; Fertilizer International; World Bank.

See also: Agricultural production statistics

See also: Top commodity suppliers

See also: Commodities glossary - Definitions of terms used in commodity trading

Overview

Diammonium phosphate (DAP) is a concentrated phosphate fertilizer used to supply both phosphorus and nitrogen to crops. It is typically traded as a granular solid and priced on a per-metric-ton basis, with market references often quoted as DAP spot prices on an FOB US Gulf basis. The US Gulf benchmark is widely used because the Gulf Coast is a major export and distribution hub with established access to phosphate rock, ammonia, rail, barge, and ocean freight routes. DAP is valued for its relatively high nutrient content and ease of handling in bulk fertilizer systems.

DAP is applied to a wide range of field crops, including cereals, oilseeds, and row crops, where phosphorus supports root development, early growth, and energy transfer within the plant. It is also used in blended fertilizers and in some industrial applications, though agriculture is the dominant use. Because it contains both phosphate and ammonium nutrients, DAP competes with other phosphate fertilizers and with blended nutrient products in farm input markets.

Supply Drivers

DAP supply is shaped by the phosphate rock and ammonia chains that feed its production. Phosphate rock deposits are geographically concentrated in a few long-established mining regions, including North Africa, the Middle East, China, the United States, and parts of the former Soviet sphere. Mining is capital intensive and constrained by ore quality, stripping ratios, beneficiation needs, and transport links from mine to plant and port. Because phosphate rock is not evenly distributed, regional logistics and export infrastructure strongly influence available supply.

Production also depends on ammonia, which is commonly derived from natural gas. This links DAP output to gas availability, fertilizer plant economics, and the cost of energy-intensive chemical processing. Plants require sulfuric acid and other inputs in the broader phosphate chain, so bottlenecks in upstream chemicals can affect finished fertilizer availability. DAP manufacturing is typically concentrated near feedstock sources or export terminals to reduce freight costs.

Supply is further shaped by seasonal production and application cycles. Fertilizer plants often build inventories ahead of planting seasons, while downstream demand can be uneven across regions. Phosphate mining and processing also face environmental permitting, water use constraints, and waste management requirements, all of which can limit expansion or raise costs. Because new mines and chemical plants take many years to develop, supply adjusts slowly to changes in demand.

Demand Drivers

DAP demand is driven primarily by crop nutrition needs, especially in soils with low available phosphorus. Phosphorus is essential for root establishment, flowering, and grain formation, so demand is closely tied to acreage planted in cereals, oilseeds, and other broad-acre crops. Farmers often apply phosphate fertilizers at planting or before planting, which creates seasonal demand patterns linked to crop calendars and soil preparation practices.

Demand is also influenced by substitution among phosphate products. DAP competes with monoammonium phosphate (MAP), triple superphosphate, and blended NPK fertilizers. The choice among these products depends on nutrient ratios, soil chemistry, application method, and local agronomic recommendations. In alkaline soils, DAP can be favored for its handling properties and nutrient concentration, while in some systems MAP or other phosphate sources are preferred.

Long-run demand reflects population growth, dietary change, and the need to maintain crop yields on limited arable land. Phosphate use is relatively inelastic in the short run because farmers cannot easily substitute away from soil nutrient replacement without affecting yields. However, efficiency gains from precision agriculture, soil testing, and improved fertilizer placement can moderate growth in unit demand per hectare. Transport costs and local blending practices also shape regional consumption patterns, especially in inland markets far from ports.

Macro and Financial Drivers

DAP prices are influenced by broad agricultural income conditions, freight costs, and the US dollar exchange rate. Because fertilizer is traded internationally in dollars, a stronger dollar can make imports more expensive in local currency terms and can affect buying behavior in importing regions. Interest rates also matter indirectly through inventory financing and working capital costs for distributors and traders.

Storage and logistics are important because DAP is a physical bulk commodity with seasonal demand. When inventories are ample, nearby supply can pressure spot prices; when stocks are tight relative to planting needs, nearby delivery can command a premium. This creates the possibility of contango or backwardation in regional forward curves, depending on freight, storage, and seasonal demand timing. DAP also tends to move with broader fertilizer and crop input markets because buyers often manage nutrient purchases as part of a whole-farm cost structure.

MonthPriceChange
Apr 200613,901.48-
May 200613,989.590.63%
Jun 200613,985.90-0.03%
Jul 200613,884.45-0.73%
Aug 200613,769.63-0.83%
Sep 200613,617.70-1.10%
Oct 200613,238.11-2.79%
Nov 200613,318.520.61%
Dec 200613,629.302.33%
Jan 200715,176.2111.35%
Feb 200719,306.2327.21%
Mar 200723,493.2721.69%
Apr 200724,571.274.59%
May 200723,780.01-3.22%
Jun 200723,524.44-1.07%
Jul 200724,079.242.36%
Aug 200724,295.780.90%
Sep 200724,227.83-0.28%
Oct 200724,638.271.69%
Nov 200727,257.7810.63%
Dec 200731,375.6115.11%
Jan 200836,357.7515.88%
Feb 200842,395.3416.61%
Mar 200852,883.7424.74%
Apr 200860,772.9914.92%
May 200867,635.1611.29%
Jun 200867,642.370.01%
Jul 200876,217.0912.68%
Aug 200879,402.104.18%
Sep 200875,792.05-4.55%
Oct 200873,108.48-3.54%
Nov 200856,801.74-22.30%
Dec 200839,148.18-31.08%
Jan 200924,481.38-37.46%
Feb 200924,971.802.00%
Mar 200925,551.442.32%
Apr 200924,212.42-5.24%
May 200921,609.56-10.75%
Jun 200920,773.38-3.87%
Jul 200921,654.354.24%
Aug 200922,914.185.82%
Sep 200923,277.231.58%
Oct 200922,628.08-2.79%
Nov 200922,828.760.89%
Dec 200927,889.2322.17%
Jan 201032,418.1316.24%
Feb 201035,150.028.43%
Mar 201035,850.591.99%
Apr 201035,065.66-2.19%
May 201034,595.72-1.34%
Jun 201033,506.58-3.15%
Jul 201035,790.526.82%
Aug 201039,402.9710.09%
Sep 201043,445.2910.26%
Oct 201047,930.0210.32%
Nov 201047,432.04-1.04%
Dec 201046,373.63-2.23%
Jan 201146,943.241.23%
Feb 201135,317.70-24.77%
Mar 201136,252.502.65%
Apr 201135,355.61-2.47%
May 201134,941.32-1.17%
Jun 201149,438.1941.49%
Jul 201151,452.524.07%
Aug 201151,788.480.65%
Sep 201151,451.61-0.65%
Oct 201149,678.93-3.45%
Nov 201148,995.49-1.38%
Dec 201143,699.71-10.81%
Jan 201240,759.55-6.73%
Feb 201239,518.77-3.04%
Mar 201240,217.291.77%
Apr 201243,365.297.83%
May 201244,759.573.22%
Jun 201247,291.395.66%
Jul 201241,269.50-12.73%
Aug 201247,693.5115.57%
Sep 201249,914.954.66%
Oct 201250,909.481.99%
Nov 201246,872.63-7.93%
Dec 201245,998.79-1.86%
Jan 201345,097.45-1.96%
Feb 201345,539.360.98%
Mar 201345,896.590.78%
Apr 201345,371.18-1.14%
May 201341,476.29-8.58%
Jun 201341,852.650.91%
Jul 201341,251.12-1.44%
Aug 201341,278.020.07%
Sep 201339,530.34-4.23%
Oct 201339,346.16-0.47%
Nov 201335,962.98-8.60%
Dec 201336,591.271.75%
Jan 201442,557.7516.31%
Feb 201447,343.2611.24%
Mar 201448,588.932.63%
Apr 201439,951.73-17.78%
May 201440,830.412.20%
Jun 201441,540.391.74%
Jul 201443,527.724.78%
Aug 201444,809.032.94%
Sep 201444,923.160.25%
Oct 201443,093.88-4.07%
Nov 201441,668.63-3.31%
Dec 201442,237.191.36%
Jan 201544,398.335.12%
Feb 201545,091.901.56%
Mar 201543,682.46-3.13%
Apr 201541,626.50-4.71%
May 201542,132.251.21%
Jun 201542,911.711.85%
Jul 201543,917.562.34%
Aug 201544,529.411.39%
Sep 201544,667.830.31%
Oct 201544,328.95-0.76%
Nov 201540,500.64-8.64%
Dec 201535,695.07-11.87%
Jan 201634,327.42-3.83%
Feb 201634,139.11-0.55%
Mar 201635,415.793.74%
Apr 201634,623.30-2.24%
May 201632,844.83-5.14%
Jun 201632,098.58-2.27%
Jul 201632,001.24-0.30%
Aug 201633,312.814.10%
Sep 201633,490.850.53%
Oct 201632,466.62-3.06%
Nov 201631,233.44-3.80%
Dec 201631,098.20-0.43%
Jan 201732,294.703.85%
Feb 201734,176.005.83%
Mar 201734,143.91-0.09%
Apr 201732,833.24-3.84%
May 201732,425.32-1.24%
Jun 201732,544.220.37%
Jul 201733,138.051.82%
Aug 201733,805.942.02%
Sep 201734,353.751.62%
Oct 201733,987.73-1.07%
Nov 201736,273.956.73%
Dec 201738,962.177.41%
Jan 201839,840.212.25%
Feb 201840,907.312.68%
Mar 201842,389.143.62%
Apr 201844,478.624.93%
May 201844,440.09-0.09%
Jun 201846,765.095.23%
Jul 201850,109.987.15%
Aug 201850,748.431.27%
Sep 201852,386.923.23%
Oct 201855,196.615.36%
Nov 201854,926.59-0.49%
Dec 201854,050.46-1.60%
Jan 201953,041.73-1.87%

Commodities Market

  • Buyers: Request price quotes
  • Sellers: List your products
Sign up to get an email when we update our commodities data

 


Your email will never be shared, sold, nor rented. We hate SPAM as much you do.
Coming Soon