Copper, grade A cathode Monthly Price - Russian Ruble per Metric Ton

Data as of March 2026

Range
May 2003 - Apr 2013: 175,735.800 (344.85%)
Chart

Description: Copper (LME), grade A, minimum 99.9935% purity, cathodes and wire bar shapes, settlement price

Unit: Russian Ruble per Metric Ton



Source: Platts Metals Week, Engineering and Mining Journal; Thomson Reuters Datastream; World Bank.

See also: Mineral production statistics

See also: Top commodity suppliers

See also: Commodities glossary - Definitions of terms used in commodity trading

Overview

Copper, grade A cathode, is the refined, high-purity form of copper used as the standard deliverable material in many physical and financial markets. It is typically priced in U.S. dollars per metric ton, with the London Metal Exchange (LME) spot price for grade A cathode serving as a widely used benchmark for global trade and hedging. Grade A cathode is the form most suitable for direct use in wire rod, cable, tubing, and other downstream manufacturing because its purity and consistency meet the specifications required by exchange delivery systems and industrial users.

Copper is valued for its high electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity, ductility, and corrosion resistance. These properties make it essential in power transmission, building wire, electronics, motors, transformers, plumbing, and industrial equipment. Because it is both a basic industrial metal and a key input to electrification infrastructure, its market reflects conditions in construction, manufacturing, and power systems. The cathode form is especially important because it is the intermediate product that links mining and smelting with fabrication into finished copper products.

Supply Drivers

Copper cathode supply is shaped by the geology of ore bodies, the long lead times required to develop mines, and the energy- and capital-intensive nature of extraction and refining. Major producing regions include South America, North America, Africa, and parts of Asia, where large porphyry deposits and other copper-bearing formations support long-lived mining operations. Ore grades, strip ratios, water availability, and access to power all influence production costs and the pace at which output can be expanded or maintained.

Supply is also constrained by the sequence of mining, concentrating, smelting, and electrorefining. Disruptions at any stage can affect cathode availability because concentrate must be processed before refined metal reaches market. Transport bottlenecks, port capacity, labor conditions, and the availability of sulfuric acid, electricity, and water can all shape output. Copper mining is sensitive to depletion in mature deposits, so sustaining production often requires continual investment in deeper pits, underground expansion, or new ore bodies.

Weather and climate matter because many large mines operate in arid or high-altitude regions where rainfall, drought, or water restrictions affect throughput. In addition, some operations face seasonal access constraints or power interruptions. Recycling provides an important secondary supply source, but it depends on scrap collection, sorting, and refining capacity, and it does not fully offset the geological limits of primary mining.

Demand Drivers

Demand for copper cathode is driven primarily by electrical and construction uses. The metal is a core input for power cables, building wire, transformers, motors, generators, appliances, and telecommunications equipment. Because these uses rely on copper’s conductivity and durability, substitution is limited in many applications, although aluminum can replace copper in some power transmission and wiring contexts where weight and cost matter more than conductivity.

Industrial demand is closely tied to construction activity, factory output, grid investment, and durable goods production. Copper is also used in plumbing, heat exchangers, and industrial machinery, which links consumption to housing starts, commercial building, and capital spending. In many economies, demand rises with urbanization, electrification, and income growth because these trends increase the intensity of copper use per person and per unit of infrastructure.

Seasonal patterns can appear in construction and power-system maintenance, but the broader demand structure is cyclical rather than purely seasonal. Scrap copper competes with refined cathode in some downstream uses, so higher scrap availability can reduce cathode demand at the margin. Regulatory and technological shifts that favor electrification, energy efficiency, and grid expansion tend to support long-run copper intensity because they increase the amount of conductive material required per unit of installed infrastructure.

Macro and Financial Drivers

Copper cathode prices are sensitive to the U.S. dollar because the metal is globally quoted in dollars while many buyers earn revenue in other currencies. A stronger dollar can make copper more expensive in local-currency terms and can weigh on demand at the margin. Prices also respond to interest rates and broader financial conditions because copper is a storable industrial metal: financing costs, warehouse economics, and inventory holding costs influence whether material moves into or out of storage.

The market often reflects the balance between near-term physical tightness and expectations of future supply, which can appear in contango or backwardation depending on inventory conditions and delivery incentives. Copper also has a partial role as a macroeconomic indicator because it is widely used in construction and manufacturing, so it tends to be sensitive to industrial activity and credit conditions. At the same time, it is not a pure financial asset; physical consumption, logistics, and refining constraints remain central to price formation.

MonthPriceChange
May 200350,959.54-
Jun 200351,390.700.85%
Jul 200351,913.591.02%
Aug 200353,428.652.92%
Sep 200354,758.132.49%
Oct 200357,876.675.70%
Nov 200361,253.355.83%
Dec 200364,786.805.77%
Jan 200469,843.997.81%
Feb 200478,690.9212.67%
Mar 200485,820.569.06%
Apr 200484,779.66-1.21%
May 200479,267.40-6.50%
Jun 200478,000.56-1.60%
Jul 200481,685.414.72%
Aug 200483,165.101.81%
Sep 200484,588.521.71%
Oct 200487,527.593.47%
Nov 200489,256.451.98%
Dec 200487,713.41-1.73%
Jan 200588,805.091.24%
Feb 200590,992.232.46%
Mar 200593,433.102.68%
Apr 200594,394.511.03%
May 200590,840.73-3.76%
Jun 2005100,477.9010.61%
Jul 2005103,719.103.23%
Aug 2005108,189.904.31%
Sep 2005109,485.901.20%
Oct 2005115,953.305.91%
Nov 2005122,862.205.96%
Dec 2005131,837.607.31%
Jan 2006133,666.301.39%
Feb 2006140,472.005.09%
Mar 2006142,137.901.19%
Apr 2006176,032.7023.85%
May 2006217,596.1023.61%
Jun 2006194,226.60-10.74%
Jul 2006207,575.806.87%
Aug 2006205,920.50-0.80%
Sep 2006203,341.40-1.25%
Oct 2006201,485.20-0.91%
Nov 2006186,982.40-7.20%
Dec 2006175,448.10-6.17%
Jan 2007150,417.10-14.27%
Feb 2007149,416.80-0.67%
Mar 2007168,462.5012.75%
Apr 2007200,379.1018.95%
May 2007198,339.40-1.02%
Jun 2007193,711.80-2.33%
Jul 2007203,626.905.12%
Aug 2007192,550.20-5.44%
Sep 2007193,027.900.25%
Oct 2007199,301.903.25%
Nov 2007170,356.50-14.52%
Dec 2007161,891.90-4.97%
Jan 2008172,964.806.84%
Feb 2008193,296.8011.76%
Mar 2008200,309.903.63%
Apr 2008204,265.001.97%
May 2008198,898.50-2.63%
Jun 2008195,255.00-1.83%
Jul 2008196,454.500.61%
Aug 2008184,670.60-6.00%
Sep 2008176,690.90-4.32%
Oct 2008130,193.30-26.32%
Nov 2008101,700.50-21.88%
Dec 200886,580.42-14.87%
Jan 2009105,733.9022.12%
Feb 2009118,715.0012.28%
Mar 2009129,696.809.25%
Apr 2009147,855.3014.00%
May 2009145,937.00-1.30%
Jun 2009155,718.906.70%
Jul 2009164,358.105.55%
Aug 2009195,331.2018.84%
Sep 2009190,685.60-2.38%
Oct 2009185,113.30-2.92%
Nov 2009193,003.304.26%
Dec 2009209,722.608.66%
Jan 2010220,225.805.01%
Feb 2010206,600.20-6.19%
Mar 2010220,575.106.76%
Apr 2010226,031.102.47%
May 2010208,591.00-7.72%
Jun 2010202,770.90-2.79%
Jul 2010206,457.301.82%
Aug 2010221,434.407.25%
Sep 2010237,494.007.25%
Oct 2010251,574.305.93%
Nov 2010262,029.504.16%
Dec 2010282,212.107.70%
Jan 2011286,433.501.50%
Feb 2011288,927.700.87%
Mar 2011270,220.30-6.47%
Apr 2011266,400.40-1.41%
May 2011250,246.90-6.06%
Jun 2011253,708.701.38%
Jul 2011269,437.606.20%
Aug 2011258,811.20-3.94%
Sep 2011255,492.80-1.28%
Oct 2011231,126.30-9.54%
Nov 2011233,632.301.08%
Dec 2011238,373.502.03%
Jan 2012250,837.205.23%
Feb 2012251,729.500.36%
Mar 2012248,505.20-1.28%
Apr 2012244,517.20-1.60%
May 2012244,892.800.15%
Jun 2012244,155.70-0.30%
Jul 2012246,678.601.03%
Aug 2012240,249.00-2.61%
Sep 2012254,077.105.76%
Oct 2012250,680.10-1.34%
Nov 2012242,353.20-3.32%
Dec 2012245,031.001.10%
Jan 2013243,329.70-0.69%
Feb 2013243,224.90-0.04%
Mar 2013235,544.90-3.16%
Apr 2013226,695.30-3.76%

Top Companies

Codelco
Website: http://www.codelco.com/
Location: Santiago, Chile
Estimated Production: 1.66 million tonnes per year

Commodities Market

  • Buyers: Request price quotes
  • Sellers: List your products
Sign up to get an email when we update our commodities data

 


Your email will never be shared, sold, nor rented. We hate SPAM as much you do.
Coming Soon