Adequacy of social safety net programs (% of total welfare of beneficiary households) - Country Ranking

Definition: Adequacy of social safety net programs is measured by the total transfer amount received by the population participating in social safety net programs as a share of their total welfare. Welfare is defined as the total income or total expenditure of beneficiary households. Social safety net programs include cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.

Source: ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, The World Bank. Data are based on national representative household surveys. (datatopics.worldbank.org/aspire/)

See also: Thematic map, Time series comparison

Find indicator:
Rank Country Value Year
1 The Gambia 55.15 2015
2 Mauritania 44.12 2008
3 Congo 39.79 2005
4 Dem. Rep. Congo 37.45 2012
5 Georgia 34.06 2018
6 South Africa 29.63 2014
7 Mauritius 28.22 2017
8 Afghanistan 27.62 2007
9 Zimbabwe 26.52 2019
10 Serbia 22.18 2015
11 Montenegro 22.09 2014
12 Botswana 21.15 2015
13 Brazil 21.05 2019
14 Dominica 21.01 2002
15 Armenia 18.30 2018
16 Uzbekistan 16.39 2018
17 Ecuador 15.85 2019
18 Côte d'Ivoire 14.74 2015
19 Costa Rica 14.30 2019
20 Belarus 14.00 2019
21 Hungary 13.93 2007
22 Bosnia and Herzegovina 13.80 2015
23 Moldova 13.24 2018
24 Croatia 13.21 2014
25 Poland 13.12 2015
26 Solomon Islands 13.03 2005
27 Bulgaria 13.02 2007
28 Paraguay 12.85 2019
29 Argentina 12.61 2019
30 Kazakhstan 12.47 2017
31 Namibia 12.03 2015
32 Djibouti 11.91 2012
33 Uganda 11.76 2016
34 Kyrgyz Republic 11.15 2013
35 Lesotho 10.79 2017
36 Romania 10.72 2016
37 Chad 10.48 2011
38 Palau 10.47 2006
39 Mexico 10.37 2018
40 Peru 9.99 2019
41 Ukraine 9.70 2018
42 Turkey 9.54 2019
43 Bolivia 9.00 2017
44 Belize 8.62 2009
45 Chile 8.54 2017
46 Ethiopia 7.40 2018
47 El Salvador 7.39 2014
48 Senegal 7.22 2011
49 Latvia 7.08 2009
50 Cabo Verde 7.05 2007
51 Colombia 6.84 2019
52 Russia 6.83 2017
53 Panama 6.73 2019
54 Thailand 6.63 2017
55 Lithuania 6.50 2008
56 Eswatini 6.46 2016
57 Azerbaijan 6.08 2015
58 Albania 6.02 2012
59 Kenya 5.99 2015
60 Sri Lanka 5.77 2016
61 Fiji 5.67 2013
62 Kiribati 5.62 2006
63 Philippines 5.43 2015
64 Pakistan 5.26 2018
65 Burkina Faso 5.02 2018
66 Mongolia 4.81 2016
67 Ghana 4.80 2016
68 Bangladesh 4.70 2016
69 Uruguay 4.62 2019
70 India 4.62 2011
71 Rwanda 4.59 2013
72 Honduras 4.50 2017
73 Nicaragua 4.42 2009
74 Slovak Republic 4.37 2009
75 Indonesia 4.27 2019
76 Dominican Republic 4.13 2019
77 Angola 4.07 2018
78 Gabon 4.02 2017
79 Jordan 3.98 2010
80 Tunisia 3.80 2010
81 Tanzania 3.69 2014
82 Egypt 3.56 2008
83 Myanmar 3.54 2017
84 Guatemala 3.38 2011
85 Yemen 3.27 2005
86 Jamaica 3.17 2017
87 Malaysia 3.04 2016
88 Malawi 3.01 2016
89 Liberia 2.94 2016
90 Vietnam 2.89 2014
91 Iraq 2.75 2012
92 Cameroon 2.61 2014
93 Nepal 2.51 2010
94 Tajikistan 2.43 2011
95 Zambia 2.42 2015
96 China 2.34 2013
97 Sierra Leone 2.18 2018
98 Bhutan 2.10 2007
99 Timor-Leste 2.06 2011
100 Nigeria 1.98 2018
101 Niger 1.63 2014
102 Sudan 1.05 2009
103 Haiti 0.57 2001
104 Papua New Guinea 0.04 2009

More rankings: Africa | Asia | Central America & the Caribbean | Europe | Middle East | North America | Oceania | South America | World |

Limitations and Exceptions: When interpreting ASPIRE performance indicators based on household surveys, it is important to note that the extent to which information on specific transfers and programs is captured in the household surveys can vary a lot across countries. Moreover, household surveys do not capture the universe of social protection programs in the country, in best practice cases just the largest programs. As a consequence, ASPIRE indicators are not fully comparable across program categories and countries; however, they provide approximate measures of social protection systems performance. In addition, there may be cases where ASPIRE performance indicators differ from official WB country reports as ASPIRE indicators are based on a first level analysis of original survey data and unified methodology that does not necessarily reflect country-specific knowledge and in depth country analysis relying on administrative program level data and/or imputations.

Aggregation method: Simple average

Periodicity: Annual