Adequacy of unemployment benefits and ALMP (% of total welfare of beneficiary households) - Country Ranking

Definition: Adequacy of unemployment benefits and active labor market programs (ALMP) is measured by the total transfer amount received by the population participating in unemployment benefits and active labor market programs as a share of their total welfare. Welfare is defined as the total income or total expenditure of beneficiary households. Unemployment benefits and active labor market programs include unemployment compensation, severance pay, and early retirement due to labor market reasons, labor market services (intermediation), training (vocational, life skills, and cash for training), job rotation and job sharing, employment incentives and wage subsidies, supported employment and rehabilitation, and employment measures for the disabled. Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.

Source: ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, The World Bank. Data are based on national representative household surveys. (datatopics.worldbank.org/aspire/)

See also: Thematic map, Time series comparison

Find indicator:
Rank Country Value Year
1 Romania 29.60 2016
2 Brazil 28.87 2019
3 Chile 27.86 2017
4 Lithuania 26.06 2008
5 Uruguay 25.97 2019
6 Poland 24.96 2015
7 Serbia 24.86 2015
8 Botswana 24.48 2015
9 South Africa 20.27 2005
10 Georgia 13.42 2011
11 Montenegro 13.18 2014
12 Albania 12.23 2012
13 Hungary 12.17 2007
14 Armenia 11.77 2013
15 Argentina 11.27 2019
16 Croatia 10.83 2014
17 Latvia 10.44 2009
18 Turkey 10.40 2019
19 Slovak Republic 9.85 2009
20 Comoros 9.21 2004
21 Mauritius 8.79 2017
22 Bulgaria 8.61 2007
23 Ukraine 6.33 2018
24 Iraq 5.50 2006
25 Kazakhstan 5.04 2014
26 Bosnia and Herzegovina 4.86 2007
27 Honduras 4.77 2011
28 Bangladesh 4.62 2010
29 Rwanda 3.36 2010
30 Russia 2.79 2017
31 Liberia 2.08 2016
32 Belarus 1.67 2016
33 Cabo Verde 1.59 2007
34 Senegal 0.93 2011

More rankings: Africa | Asia | Central America & the Caribbean | Europe | Middle East | North America | Oceania | South America | World |

Limitations and Exceptions: When interpreting ASPIRE performance indicators based on household surveys, it is important to note that the extent to which information on specific transfers and programs is captured in the household surveys can vary a lot across countries. Moreover, household surveys do not capture the universe of social protection programs in the country, in best practice cases just the largest programs. As a consequence, ASPIRE indicators are not fully comparable across program categories and countries; however, they provide approximate measures of social protection systems performance. In addition, there may be cases where ASPIRE performance indicators differ from official WB country reports as ASPIRE indicators are based on a first level analysis of original survey data and unified methodology that does not necessarily reflect country-specific knowledge and in depth country analysis relying on administrative program level data and/or imputations.

Aggregation method: Simple average

Periodicity: Annual