Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate) - Country Ranking - Africa

Definition: Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.

Source: Derived using data from International Labour Organization, ILOSTAT database. Data retrieved in September 2019.

See also: Thematic map, Time series comparison

Find indicator:
Rank Country Value Year
1 Niger 91.64 2019
2 Somalia 88.81 2019
3 Central African Republic 88.80 2019
4 Chad 86.79 2019
5 Eritrea 85.00 2019
6 Guinea 83.26 2019
7 Burkina Faso 82.29 2019
8 Sierra Leone 82.15 2019
9 Ethiopia 81.32 2019
10 Benin 80.62 2019
11 Guinea-Bissau 80.32 2019
12 Madagascar 79.77 2019
13 Equatorial Guinea 79.61 2019
14 Burundi 78.90 2019
15 Tanzania 76.52 2019
16 Nigeria 74.87 2019
17 Mali 74.31 2019
18 Mozambique 70.92 2019
19 Dem. Rep. Congo 66.90 2019
20 Uganda 66.65 2019
21 Zambia 65.24 2019
22 Liberia 65.08 2019
23 Congo 64.63 2019
24 Cameroon 62.90 2019
25 Angola 62.71 2019
26 The Gambia 62.68 2019
27 Togo 62.09 2019
28 Côte d'Ivoire 61.47 2019
29 Ghana 58.43 2019
30 Senegal 58.11 2019
31 Zimbabwe 57.09 2019
32 São Tomé and Principe 56.44 2019
33 Rwanda 55.53 2019
34 Malawi 54.06 2019
35 Comoros 50.06 2019
36 Sudan 47.54 2019
37 Morocco 42.91 2019
38 Mauritania 41.40 2019
39 Kenya 41.38 2019
40 Lesotho 39.73 2019
41 Libya 36.13 2019
42 Djibouti 28.51 2019
43 Algeria 28.43 2019
44 Gabon 27.61 2019
45 Eswatini 26.95 2019
46 Namibia 24.87 2019
47 Cabo Verde 23.92 2019
48 Tunisia 21.29 2019
49 Botswana 19.84 2019
50 Mauritius 18.58 2019
51 Egypt 15.41 2019
52 South Africa 10.73 2019

More rankings: Africa | Asia | Central America & the Caribbean | Europe | Middle East | North America | Oceania | South America | World |

Development Relevance: Breaking down employment information by status in employment provides a statistical basis for describing workers' behaviour and conditions of work, and for defining an individual's socio-economic group. A high proportion of wage and salaried workers in a country can signify advanced economic development. If the proportion of own-account workers (self-employed without hired employees) is sizeable, it may be an indication of a large agriculture sector and low growth in the formal economy. A high proportion of contributing family workers — generally unpaid, although compensation might come indirectly in the form of family income — may indicate weak development, little job growth, and often a large rural economy. Each status group faces different economic risks, and contributing family workers and own-account workers are the most vulnerable - and therefore the most likely to fall into poverty. They are the least likely to have formal work arrangements, are the least likely to have social protection and safety nets to guard against economic shocks, and often are incapable of generating sufficient savings to offset these shocks.

Limitations and Exceptions: Data are drawn from labor force surveys and household surveys, supplemented by official estimates and censuses for a small group of countries. Due to differences in definitions and coverage across countries, there are limitations for comparing data across countries and over time even within a country. Estimates of women in employment are not comparable internationally, reflecting that demographic, social, legal, and cultural trends and norms determine whether women's activities are regarded as economic.

Statistical Concept and Methodology: The indicator of status in employment distinguishes between two categories of the total employed. These are: (a) wage and salaried workers (also known as employees); and (b) self-employed workers. Self-employed group is broken down in the subcategories: self-employed workers with employees (employers), self-employed workers without employees (own-account workers), members of producers' cooperatives and contributing family workers (also known as unpaid family workers). Vulnerable employment refers to the sum of contributing family workers and own-account workers. Data are derived using ILO modeled estimate series which are harmonized to ensure comparability across countries and over time by accounting for differences in data source, scope of coverage, methodology, and other country-specific factors. The estimates are based mainly on nationally representative labor force surveys, with other sources (population censuses and nationally reported estimates) used only when no survey data are available.

Aggregation method: Weighted average

Periodicity: Annual