Time to resolve insolvency (years) - Country Ranking

Definition: Time to resolve insolvency is the number of years from the filing for insolvency in court until the resolution of distressed assets.

Source: World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/).

See also: Thematic map, Time series comparison

Find indicator:
Rank Country Value Year
1 Cambodia 6.00 2019
2 Ecuador 5.30 2019
3 Gabon 5.00 2019
3 Myanmar 5.00 2019
3 Niger 5.00 2019
3 Vietnam 5.00 2019
3 Burundi 5.00 2019
3 Suriname 5.00 2019
3 Turkey 5.00 2019
10 Central African Republic 4.80 2019
11 Kenya 4.50 2019
12 Kuwait 4.20 2019
13 Syrian Arab Republic 4.10 2019
14 Chad 4.00 2019
14 Slovak Republic 4.00 2019
14 Mongolia 4.00 2019
14 Benin 4.00 2019
14 Bangladesh 4.00 2019
14 Brazil 4.00 2019
14 Burkina Faso 4.00 2019
14 Dominica 4.00 2019
14 Venezuela 4.00 2019
23 Paraguay 3.90 2019
24 Honduras 3.80 2019
24 Guinea 3.80 2019
26 Mali 3.60 2019
27 Greece 3.50 2019
27 Dominican Republic 3.50 2019
27 Morocco 3.50 2019
27 El Salvador 3.50 2019
31 Romania 3.30 2019
31 Congo 3.30 2019
31 Zimbabwe 3.30 2019
31 Bulgaria 3.30 2019
31 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.30 2019
36 United Arab Emirates 3.20 2019
37 Croatia 3.10 2019
37 Peru 3.10 2019
39 Papua New Guinea 3.00 2019
39 Poland 3.00 2019
39 Madagascar 3.00 2019
39 Lebanon 3.00 2019
39 Liberia 3.00 2019
39 Jordan 3.00 2019
39 Antigua and Barbuda 3.00 2019
39 The Bahamas 3.00 2019
39 Guatemala 3.00 2019
39 Guyana 3.00 2019
39 Estonia 3.00 2019
39 Ethiopia 3.00 2019
39 Switzerland 3.00 2019
39 Costa Rica 3.00 2019
39 Malta 3.00 2019
39 Oman 3.00 2019
39 Togo 3.00 2019
39 Portugal 3.00 2019
39 Senegal 3.00 2019
39 Tanzania 3.00 2019
39 Yemen 3.00 2019
60 Ukraine 2.90 2019
61 Cameroon 2.80 2019
61 Moldova 2.80 2019
61 Qatar 2.80 2019
64 Philippines 2.70 2019
64 Tonga 2.70 2019
66 Pakistan 2.60 2019
66 Malawi 2.60 2019
66 Lesotho 2.60 2019
66 Vanuatu 2.60 2019
70 Trinidad and Tobago 2.50 2019
70 Bahrain 2.50 2019
70 Puerto Rico 2.50 2019
70 Namibia 2.50 2019
70 Rwanda 2.50 2019
70 Brunei 2.50 2019
70 Egypt 2.50 2019
70 Panama 2.50 2019
78 Argentina 2.40 2019
79 Lithuania 2.30 2019
79 Sierra Leone 2.30 2019
79 San Marino 2.30 2019
82 Uganda 2.20 2019
82 Côte d'Ivoire 2.20 2019
82 Nicaragua 2.20 2019
85 Czech Republic 2.10 2019
86 Chile 2.00 2019
86 Hungary 2.00 2019
86 Albania 2.00 2019
86 Luxembourg 2.00 2019
86 St. Lucia 2.00 2019
86 Israel 2.00 2019
86 Georgia 2.00 2019
86 Nigeria 2.00 2019
86 Nepal 2.00 2019
86 Palau 2.00 2019
86 Russia 2.00 2019
86 Eswatini 2.00 2019
86 Seychelles 2.00 2019
86 Afghanistan 2.00 2019
86 Belize 2.00 2019
86 The Gambia 2.00 2019
86 Serbia 2.00 2019
86 Sweden 2.00 2019
86 Sudan 2.00 2019
86 South Africa 2.00 2019
86 Uzbekistan 2.00 2019
86 Samoa 2.00 2019
108 Armenia 1.90 2019
108 France 1.90 2019
108 Ghana 1.90 2019
111 Italy 1.80 2019
111 Bolivia 1.80 2019
111 Barbados 1.80 2019
111 Uruguay 1.80 2019
111 Fiji 1.80 2019
111 Mexico 1.80 2019
117 Sri Lanka 1.70 2019
117 Mauritius 1.70 2019
117 Tajikistan 1.70 2019
117 China 1.70 2019
117 Colombia 1.70 2019
117 Botswana 1.70 2019
123 India 1.60 2019
124 Azerbaijan 1.50 2019
124 Belarus 1.50 2019
124 Cyprus 1.50 2019
124 Kyrgyz Republic 1.50 2019
124 Korea 1.50 2019
124 Spain 1.50 2019
124 Djibouti 1.50 2019
124 Iran 1.50 2019
124 Liechtenstein 1.50 2019
124 Latvia 1.50 2019
124 Kazakhstan 1.50 2019
124 North Macedonia 1.50 2019
124 Mozambique 1.50 2019
124 Thailand 1.50 2019
138 Montenegro 1.40 2019
139 New Zealand 1.30 2019
139 Tunisia 1.30 2019
139 Algeria 1.30 2019
142 Germany 1.20 2019
143 Jamaica 1.10 2019
143 Netherlands 1.10 2019
143 Austria 1.10 2019
143 Indonesia 1.10 2019
147 United States 1.00 2019
147 Australia 1.00 2019
147 Malaysia 1.00 2019
147 Iceland 1.00 2019
147 Solomon Islands 1.00 2019
147 United Kingdom 1.00 2019
147 Denmark 1.00 2019
147 Zambia 1.00 2019
155 Belgium 0.90 2019
155 Finland 0.90 2019
155 Norway 0.90 2019
158 Singapore 0.80 2019
158 Slovenia 0.80 2019
158 Hong Kong SAR, China 0.80 2019
158 Canada 0.80 2019
162 Japan 0.60 2019
163 Ireland 0.40 2019

More rankings: Africa | Asia | Central America & the Caribbean | Europe | Middle East | North America | Oceania | South America | World |

Development Relevance: The economic health of a country is measured not only in macroeconomic terms but also by other factors that shape daily economic activity such as laws, regulations, and institutional arrangements. The data measure business regulation, gauge regulatory outcomes, and measure the extent of legal protection of property, the flexibility of employment regulation, and the tax burden on businesses. The fundamental premise of this data is that economic activity requires good rules and regulations that are efficient, accessible to all who need to use them, and simple to implement. Thus sometimes there is more emphasis on more regulation, such as stricter disclosure requirements in related-party transactions, and other times emphasis is on for simplified regulations, such as a one-stop shop for completing business startup formalities. Entrepreneurs may not be aware of all required procedures or may avoid legally required procedures altogether. But where regulation is particularly onerous, levels of informality are higher, which comes at a cost: firms in the informal sector usually grow more slowly, have less access to credit, and employ fewer workers - and those workers remain outside the protections of labor law. The indicator can help policymakers understand the business environment in a country and - along with information from other sources such as the World Bank's Enterprise Surveys - provide insights into potential areas of reform.

Limitations and Exceptions: The Doing Business methodology has limitations that should be considered when interpreting the data. First, the data collected refer to businesses in the economy's largest city and may not represent regulations in other locations of the economy. To address this limitation, subnational indicators are being collected for selected economies. These subnational studies point to significant differences in the speed of reform and the ease of doing business across cities in the same economy. Second, the data often focus on a specific business form - generally a limited liability company of a specified size - and may not represent regulation for other types of businesses such as sole proprietorships. Third, transactions described in a standardized business case refer to a specific set of issues and may not represent the full set of issues a business encounters. Fourth, the time measures involve an element of judgment by the expert respondents. When sources indicate different estimates, the Doing Business time indicators represent the median values of several responses given under the assumptions of the standardized case. Fifth, the methodology assumes that a business has full information on what is required and does not waste time when completing procedures.

Statistical Concept and Methodology: Data are collected by the World Bank with a standardized survey that uses a simple business case to ensure comparability across economies and over time - with assumptions about the legal form of the business, its size, its location, and nature of its operation. Surveys are administered through more than 9,000 local experts, including lawyers, business consultants, accountants, freight forwarders, government officials, and other professionals who routinely administer or advise on legal and regulatory requirements. The indicator measures the time, cost, and outcome of insolvency proceedings involving domestic entities. The time required for creditors to recover their credit is recorded in calendar years. The cost of the proceedings is recorded as a percentage of the value of the debtor's estate. The Doing Business project of the World Bank encompasses two types of data: data from readings of laws and regulations and data on time and motion indicators that measure efficiency in achieving a regulatory goal. Within the time and motion indicators cost estimates are recorded from official fee schedules where applicable. The data from surveys are subjected to numerous tests for robustness, which lead to revision or expansion of the information collected.

Aggregation method: Unweighted average

Periodicity: Annual

General Comments: Data are presented for the survey year instead of publication year.