Firms that spend on R&D (% of firms) - Country Ranking

Definition: Percent of firms that spend on research and development.

Source: World Bank, Enterprise Surveys (http://www.enterprisesurveys.org/).

See also: Thematic map, Time series comparison

Find indicator:
Rank Country Value Year
1 Finland 47.50 2020
2 Guyana 46.10 2010
2 Chile 46.10 2010
4 Central African Republic 45.50 2011
5 Namibia 42.20 2014
6 Costa Rica 40.60 2010
7 China 38.70 2012
8 Barbados 33.70 2010
9 Burundi 30.90 2014
10 Colombia 30.50 2017
11 St. Kitts and Nevis 30.20 2010
12 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 30.10 2010
13 Ecuador 30.00 2017
14 Netherlands 29.90 2020
15 Uganda 29.70 2013
15 India 29.70 2014
17 Belgium 28.90 2020
17 Denmark 28.90 2020
19 The Bahamas 28.40 2010
20 Grenada 27.40 2010
21 Luxembourg 27.00 2020
22 Sudan 25.20 2014
23 Mauritania 23.70 2014
24 Antigua and Barbuda 22.90 2010
24 Ghana 22.90 2013
24 Peru 22.90 2017
24 Venezuela 22.90 2010
24 Uruguay 22.90 2017
29 Mexico 22.70 2010
30 Argentina 22.60 2017
30 Dem. Rep. Congo 22.60 2013
30 South Africa 22.60 2020
33 Timor-Leste 22.20 2015
34 Philippines 21.90 2015
35 Papua New Guinea 21.50 2015
36 Afghanistan 20.90 2014
37 Slovenia 20.60 2019
38 Jamaica 20.40 2010
38 Czech Republic 20.40 2019
40 Kenya 20.30 2018
41 Solomon Islands 20.00 2015
42 Pakistan 19.80 2013
43 Suriname 19.70 2018
44 Malawi 18.40 2014
45 Togo 18.10 2016
46 Djibouti 18.00 2013
47 Nicaragua 17.90 2016
48 Bangladesh 17.30 2013
49 Malta 16.40 2019
50 Eswatini 16.10 2016
51 Bolivia 15.80 2017
51 Ireland 15.80 2020
53 Vietnam 15.70 2015
54 Guatemala 15.50 2017
54 Sweden 15.50 2020
56 Paraguay 15.00 2017
57 Estonia 14.50 2019
58 Zambia 14.40 2019
59 Bosnia and Herzegovina 14.20 2019
60 Benin 14.00 2016
61 Nigeria 13.80 2014
62 Serbia 13.50 2019
63 Chad 12.90 2018
64 Tanzania 12.60 2013
65 Zimbabwe 12.40 2016
65 Trinidad and Tobago 12.40 2010
67 Cambodia 12.30 2016
68 Dominica 12.10 2010
69 Mongolia 11.40 2019
69 Belarus 11.40 2018
69 Mali 11.40 2016
72 Armenia 11.20 2020
72 Morocco 11.20 2019
74 Azerbaijan 11.10 2019
74 Sierra Leone 11.10 2017
76 Latvia 11.00 2019
77 The Gambia 10.70 2018
77 Greece 10.70 2018
79 Georgia 10.60 2019
80 Liberia 10.50 2017
80 Malaysia 10.50 2015
82 Moldova 10.40 2019
83 Kyrgyz Republic 10.30 2019
84 Ukraine 9.90 2019
84 St. Lucia 9.90 2010
86 North Macedonia 9.60 2019
87 Israel 9.50 2013
88 Tajikistan 8.90 2019
89 Russia 8.80 2019
90 Senegal 8.50 2014
91 Rwanda 8.10 2019
92 Cyprus 8.00 2019
92 Niger 8.00 2017
94 El Salvador 7.70 2016
95 Mozambique 7.60 2018
96 Sri Lanka 7.50 2011
97 Panama 7.40 2010
97 Lebanon 7.40 2019
97 Honduras 7.40 2016
100 Hungary 7.30 2019
100 Turkey 7.30 2019
100 Nepal 7.30 2013
100 Bhutan 7.30 2015
104 Guinea 7.20 2016
105 Romania 7.10 2019
106 Côte d'Ivoire 6.80 2016
107 Tunisia 6.70 2020
108 Yemen 6.40 2013
109 Cameroon 5.70 2016
109 Dominican Republic 5.70 2016
111 Slovak Republic 5.60 2019
112 Bulgaria 5.40 2019
113 Italy 5.00 2019
114 Belize 4.80 2010
115 Uzbekistan 4.50 2019
116 Ethiopia 4.40 2015
117 Portugal 4.00 2019
118 Croatia 3.40 2019
119 Jordan 2.50 2019
120 Poland 2.40 2019
120 Albania 2.40 2019
122 Lithuania 2.30 2019
123 Kazakhstan 2.10 2019
124 Indonesia 1.90 2015
125 Lao PDR 1.40 2018
126 Myanmar 1.30 2016
126 Montenegro 1.30 2019
128 Thailand 1.10 2016
128 Egypt 1.10 2020
130 Lesotho 1.00 2016

More rankings: Africa | Asia | Central America & the Caribbean | Europe | Middle East | North America | Oceania | South America | World |

Development Relevance: Firms evaluating investment options, governments interested in improving business conditions, and economists seeking to explain economic performance have all grappled with defining and measuring the business environment. The firm-level data from Enterprise Surveys provide a useful tool for benchmarking economies across a large number of indicators measured at the firm level. Informality is associated with business operations without registration. The informal sector in an economy may be a source of unfair competition to formal firms and also deprive governments of potential tax revenue and diminish a government's capacity for regulatory oversight. Informality can be defined along different dimensions such as operating without registration, income tax evasion, labor tax evasion, or operating outside the legal framework of an economy. Firms may show different degrees of informality along these dimensions which may also overlap. A large informal sector has serious consequences for the formal private sector, and may pose unfair competition for formal firms. It is an approximation to the prevalence of informality in the private economy.

Limitations and Exceptions: The sampling methodology for Enterprise Surveys is stratified random sampling. In a simple random sample, all members of the population have the same probability of being selected and no weighting of the observations is necessary. In a stratified random sample, all population units are grouped within homogeneous groups and simple random samples are selected within each group. This method allows computing estimates for each of the strata with a specified level of precision while population estimates can also be estimated by properly weighting individual observations. The sampling weights take care of the varying probabilities of selection across different strata. Under certain conditions, estimates' precision under stratified random sampling will be higher than under simple random sampling (lower standard errors may result from the estimation procedure). The strata for Enterprise Surveys are firm size, business sector, and geographic region within a country. Firm size levels are 5-19 (small), 20-99 (medium), and 100+ employees (large-sized firms). Since in most economies, the majority of firms are small and medium-sized, Enterprise Surveys oversample large firms since larger firms tend to be engines of job creation. Sector breakdown is usually manufacturing, retail, and other services. For larger economies, specific manufacturing sub-sectors are selected as additional strata on the basis of employment, value-added, and total number of establishments figures. Geographic regions within a country are selected based on which cities/regions collectively contain the majority of economic activity. Ideally the survey sample frame is derived from the universe of eligible firms obtained from the country’s statistical office. Sometimes the master list of firms is obtained from other government agencies such as tax or business licensing authorities. In some cases, the list of firms is obtained from business associations or marketing databases. In a few cases, the sample frame is created via block enumeration, where the World Bank “manually” constructs a list of eligible firms after 1) partitioning a country’s cities of major economic activity into clusters and blocks, 2) randomly selecting a subset of blocks which will then be enumerated. In surveys conducted since 2005-06, survey documentation which explains the source of the sample frame and any special circumstances encountered during survey fieldwork are included with the collected datasets. Obtaining panel data, i.e. interviews with the same firms across multiple years, is a priority in current Enterprise Surveys. When conducting a new Enterprise Survey in a country where data was previously collected, maximal effort is expended to re-interview as many firms (from the prior survey) as possible. For these panel firms, sampling weights can be adjusted to take into account the resulting altered probabilities of inclusion in the sample frame.

Original Source Notes: All surveys were administered using the Enterprise Surveys methodology as outlined in the Methodology page which can be found from www.enterprisesurveys.org.

Statistical Concept and Methodology: Firm-level surveys have been conducted since the 1990's by different units within the World Bank. Since 2005-06, most data collection efforts have been centralized within the Enterprise Analysis Unit. Surveys implemented by the Enterprise Analysis Unit follow the Global Methodology. Private contractors conduct the Enterprise Surveys on behalf of the World Bank. Due to sensitive survey questions addressing business-government relations and bribery-related topics, private contractors, rather than any government agency or an organization/institution associated with government, are hired by the World Bank to collect the data. Confidentiality of the survey respondents and the sensitive information they provide is necessary to ensure the greatest degree of survey participation, integrity and confidence in the quality of the data. Surveys are usually carried out in cooperation with business organizations and government agencies promoting job creation and economic growth, but confidentiality is never compromised. The Enterprise Survey is answered by business owners and top managers. Sometimes the survey respondent calls company accountants and human resource managers into the interview to answer questions in the sales and labor sections of the survey. Typically 1200-1800 interviews are conducted in larger economies, 360 interviews are conducted in medium-sized economies, and for smaller economies, 150 interviews take place. The manufacturing and services sectors are the primary business sectors of interest. This corresponds to firms classified with ISIC codes 15-37, 45, 50-52, 55, 60-64, and 72 (ISIC Rev.3.1). Formal (registered) companies with 5 or more employees are targeted for interview. Services firms include construction, retail, wholesale, hotels, restaurants, transport, storage, communications, and IT. Firms with 100% government/state ownership are not eligible to participate in an Enterprise Survey. Occasionally, for a few surveyed countries, other sectors are included in the companies surveyed such as education or health-related businesses. In each country, businesses in the cities/regions of major economic activity are interviewed. In some countries, other surveys, which depart from the usual Enterprise Survey methodology, are conducted. Examples include 1) Informal Surveys- surveys of informal (unregistered) enterprises, 2) Micro Surveys- surveys fielded to registered firms with less than five employees, and 3) Financial Crisis Assessment Surveys- short surveys administered by telephone to assess the effects of the global financial crisis of 2008-09. The Enterprise Surveys Unit uses two instruments: the Manufacturing Questionnaire and the Services Questionnaire. Although many questions overlap, some are only applicable to one type of business. For example, retail firms are not asked about production and nonproduction workers. The standard Enterprise Survey topics include firm characteristics, gender participation, access to finance, annual sales, costs of inputs/labor, workforce composition, bribery, licensing, infrastructure, trade, crime, competition, capacity utilization, land and permits, taxation, informality, business-government relations, innovation and technology, and performance measures. Over 90% of the questions objectively ascertain characteristics of a country’s business environment. The remaining questions assess the survey respondents’ opinions on what are the obstacles to firm growth and performance. The mode of data collection is face-to-face interviews.

Aggregation method: Unweighted average

Periodicity: Annual