Time required to obtain an operating license (days) - Country Ranking

Definition: Time required to obtain operating license is the average wait to obtain an operating license from the day the establishment applied for it to the day it was granted.

Source: World Bank, Enterprise Surveys (http://www.enterprisesurveys.org/).

See also: Thematic map, Time series comparison

Find indicator:
Rank Country Value Year
1 Uruguay 176.00 2017
2 Syrian Arab Republic 169.20 2009
3 Suriname 125.20 2018
4 Denmark 119.90 2020
5 Venezuela 117.20 2010
6 Malta 98.80 2019
7 Belgium 95.50 2020
8 Serbia 92.80 2019
9 Peru 91.90 2017
10 Argentina 88.20 2017
11 Luxembourg 87.80 2020
12 Brazil 79.70 2009
13 Slovenia 78.50 2019
14 Togo 78.40 2016
15 Netherlands 77.40 2020
16 Chile 68.50 2010
17 Panama 66.30 2010
18 Mauritania 64.60 2014
19 Mexico 54.00 2010
20 Barbados 49.30 2010
21 Honduras 48.90 2016
22 Colombia 45.10 2017
23 Mali 44.20 2016
24 Côte d'Ivoire 43.90 2016
25 Mongolia 42.00 2019
26 Dominican Republic 41.30 2016
27 Niger 39.70 2009
28 Myanmar 39.20 2016
28 Cabo Verde 39.20 2009
28 Tunisia 39.20 2013
31 Belarus 38.00 2018
32 Guatemala 37.50 2017
33 Burkina Faso 35.80 2009
34 Croatia 35.60 2019
34 Costa Rica 35.60 2010
36 Greece 35.50 2018
37 Cameroon 35.40 2016
38 Cyprus 35.30 2019
39 Angola 34.70 2010
40 Sweden 34.40 2020
41 Finland 34.30 2020
42 Chad 34.10 2018
43 Bangladesh 33.50 2013
44 Czech Republic 33.10 2019
45 Cambodia 33.00 2016
46 Italy 32.70 2019
47 Paraguay 32.40 2017
48 El Salvador 30.90 2016
49 Benin 30.70 2009
50 Guinea-Bissau 30.40 2006
51 Ecuador 29.20 2017
52 Trinidad and Tobago 28.70 2010
53 Senegal 27.80 2014
54 China 27.50 2012
55 Nicaragua 27.30 2016
56 Botswana 27.20 2010
57 Lao PDR 27.00 2018
58 Bolivia 26.60 2017
59 Kazakhstan 26.00 2019
60 Estonia 25.40 2019
61 Mozambique 24.90 2018
62 Ghana 24.50 2013
63 Namibia 24.40 2014
64 Dem. Rep. Congo 24.10 2013
65 Kyrgyz Republic 23.90 2019
66 Slovak Republic 23.50 2019
67 Russia 22.50 2019
68 Guyana 22.40 2010
69 Grenada 22.20 2010
70 Romania 21.90 2019
71 Ukraine 21.50 2019
72 Papua New Guinea 20.90 2015
73 Bulgaria 20.80 2019
74 Zambia 20.00 2019
75 Iraq 19.40 2011
76 Algeria 19.30 2007
77 Mauritius 19.10 2009
78 Malawi 19.00 2014
79 Tanzania 18.80 2013
80 Latvia 18.10 2019
81 Turkey 17.90 2019
82 Vanuatu 17.80 2009
82 Philippines 17.80 2015
82 India 17.80 2014
85 The Bahamas 17.40 2010
86 Timor-Leste 17.10 2015
87 Sri Lanka 16.70 2011
88 Tajikistan 15.90 2019
88 Bosnia and Herzegovina 15.90 2019
90 Uzbekistan 15.70 2019
91 Ireland 15.40 2020
92 Sierra Leone 15.30 2017
93 Lithuania 14.80 2019
94 Central African Republic 14.50 2011
94 South Africa 14.50 2020
96 Nigeria 14.40 2014
97 Madagascar 14.30 2013
97 Egypt 14.30 2020
99 Azerbaijan 13.90 2019
100 Afghanistan 13.70 2014
101 Hungary 13.10 2019
102 Guinea 13.00 2006
103 Gabon 12.10 2009
104 Rwanda 11.80 2019
105 Solomon Islands 11.70 2015
106 Kenya 11.40 2018
106 Vietnam 11.40 2015
108 Moldova 11.10 2019
109 Albania 10.90 2019
110 Liberia 10.40 2017
110 Pakistan 10.40 2013
110 Uganda 10.40 2013
113 Burundi 10.10 2014
114 Nepal 9.80 2013
115 Jamaica 9.30 2010
116 Djibouti 8.80 2013
117 Zimbabwe 8.10 2016
118 Morocco 7.50 2019
119 Lebanon 7.30 2019
119 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 7.30 2010
121 Armenia 7.20 2020
122 Yemen 7.00 2013
123 Fiji 6.50 2009
124 North Macedonia 6.40 2019
125 Montenegro 6.00 2019
125 Indonesia 6.00 2015
127 The Gambia 5.40 2018
127 Ethiopia 5.40 2015
129 Eswatini 5.30 2016
130 Samoa 4.80 2009
131 Sudan 4.70 2014
132 Georgia 4.50 2019
133 Malaysia 3.80 2015
134 Tonga 3.20 2009
135 Antigua and Barbuda 2.90 2010
136 Jordan 2.80 2019
137 Dominica 2.60 2010
138 Thailand 2.50 2016
139 St. Lucia 1.90 2010
139 Lesotho 1.90 2016
139 St. Kitts and Nevis 1.90 2010
139 Belize 1.90 2010
143 Bhutan 1.20 2015
143 Poland 1.20 2019

More rankings: Africa | Asia | Central America & the Caribbean | Europe | Middle East | North America | Oceania | South America | World |

Development Relevance: Firms evaluating investment options, governments interested in improving business conditions, and economists seeking to explain economic performance have all grappled with defining and measuring the business environment. The firm-level data from Enterprise Surveys provide a useful tool for benchmarking economies across a large number of indicators measured at the firm level. Most countries can improve regulation and taxation without compromising broader social interests. Excessive regulation may harm business performance and growth. For example, time spent with tax officials is a burden firms may face in paying taxes. The business environment suffers when governments increase uncertainty and risks or impose unnecessary costs and unsound regulation and taxation. Time to obtain licenses and permits and the associated red tape constrain firm operations. Open markets allow firms to expand, raise standards for efficiency on exporters, and enable firms to import low cost supplies. However, trading also forces firms to deal with customs services and trade regulations, obtain export and import licenses, and in some cases, firms also face additional costs due to losses during transport.

Limitations and Exceptions: The sampling methodology for Enterprise Surveys is stratified random sampling. In a simple random sample, all members of the population have the same probability of being selected and no weighting of the observations is necessary. In a stratified random sample, all population units are grouped within homogeneous groups and simple random samples are selected within each group. This method allows computing estimates for each of the strata with a specified level of precision while population estimates can also be estimated by properly weighting individual observations. The sampling weights take care of the varying probabilities of selection across different strata. Under certain conditions, estimates' precision under stratified random sampling will be higher than under simple random sampling (lower standard errors may result from the estimation procedure). The strata for Enterprise Surveys are firm size, business sector, and geographic region within a country. Firm size levels are 5-19 (small), 20-99 (medium), and 100+ employees (large-sized firms). Since in most economies, the majority of firms are small and medium-sized, Enterprise Surveys oversample large firms since larger firms tend to be engines of job creation. Sector breakdown is usually manufacturing, retail, and other services. For larger economies, specific manufacturing sub-sectors are selected as additional strata on the basis of employment, value-added, and total number of establishments figures. Geographic regions within a country are selected based on which cities/regions collectively contain the majority of economic activity. Ideally the survey sample frame is derived from the universe of eligible firms obtained from the country’s statistical office. Sometimes the master list of firms is obtained from other government agencies such as tax or business licensing authorities. In some cases, the list of firms is obtained from business associations or marketing databases. In a few cases, the sample frame is created via block enumeration, where the World Bank “manually” constructs a list of eligible firms after 1) partitioning a country’s cities of major economic activity into clusters and blocks, 2) randomly selecting a subset of blocks which will then be enumerated. In surveys conducted since 2005-06, survey documentation which explains the source of the sample frame and any special circumstances encountered during survey fieldwork are included with the collected datasets. Obtaining panel data, i.e. interviews with the same firms across multiple years, is a priority in current Enterprise Surveys. When conducting a new Enterprise Survey in a country where data was previously collected, maximal effort is expended to re-interview as many firms (from the prior survey) as possible. For these panel firms, sampling weights can be adjusted to take into account the resulting altered probabilities of inclusion in the sample frame.

Original Source Notes: All surveys were administered using the Enterprise Surveys methodology as outlined in the Methodology page which can be found from www.enterprisesurveys.org.

Statistical Concept and Methodology: Firm-level surveys have been conducted since the 1990's by different units within the World Bank. Since 2005-06, most data collection efforts have been centralized within the Enterprise Analysis Unit. Surveys implemented by the Enterprise Analysis Unit follow the Global Methodology. Private contractors conduct the Enterprise Surveys on behalf of the World Bank. Due to sensitive survey questions addressing business-government relations and bribery-related topics, private contractors, rather than any government agency or an organization/institution associated with government, are hired by the World Bank to collect the data. Confidentiality of the survey respondents and the sensitive information they provide is necessary to ensure the greatest degree of survey participation, integrity and confidence in the quality of the data. Surveys are usually carried out in cooperation with business organizations and government agencies promoting job creation and economic growth, but confidentiality is never compromised. The Enterprise Survey is answered by business owners and top managers. Sometimes the survey respondent calls company accountants and human resource managers into the interview to answer questions in the sales and labor sections of the survey. Typically 1200-1800 interviews are conducted in larger economies, 360 interviews are conducted in medium-sized economies, and for smaller economies, 150 interviews take place. The manufacturing and services sectors are the primary business sectors of interest. This corresponds to firms classified with ISIC codes 15-37, 45, 50-52, 55, 60-64, and 72 (ISIC Rev.3.1). Formal (registered) companies with 5 or more employees are targeted for interview. Services firms include construction, retail, wholesale, hotels, restaurants, transport, storage, communications, and IT. Firms with 100% government/state ownership are not eligible to participate in an Enterprise Survey. Occasionally, for a few surveyed countries, other sectors are included in the companies surveyed such as education or health-related businesses. In each country, businesses in the cities/regions of major economic activity are interviewed. In some countries, other surveys, which depart from the usual Enterprise Survey methodology, are conducted. Examples include 1) Informal Surveys- surveys of informal (unregistered) enterprises, 2) Micro Surveys- surveys fielded to registered firms with less than five employees, and 3) Financial Crisis Assessment Surveys- short surveys administered by telephone to assess the effects of the global financial crisis of 2008-09. The Enterprise Surveys Unit uses two instruments: the Manufacturing Questionnaire and the Services Questionnaire. Although many questions overlap, some are only applicable to one type of business. For example, retail firms are not asked about production and nonproduction workers. The standard Enterprise Survey topics include firm characteristics, gender participation, access to finance, annual sales, costs of inputs/labor, workforce composition, bribery, licensing, infrastructure, trade, crime, competition, capacity utilization, land and permits, taxation, informality, business-government relations, innovation and technology, and performance measures. Over 90% of the questions objectively ascertain characteristics of a country’s business environment. The remaining questions assess the survey respondents’ opinions on what are the obstacles to firm growth and performance. The mode of data collection is face-to-face interviews.

Aggregation method: Unweighted average

Periodicity: Annual