Losses due to theft and vandalism (% of annual sales for affected firms) - Country Ranking

Definition: Average losses as a result of theft, robbery, vandalism or arson that occurred on the establishment’s premises calculated as a percentage of annual sales. The value represents the average losses for all firms which reported losses (please see indicator IC.FRM.THEV.ZS).

Source: World Bank, Enterprise Surveys (http://www.enterprisesurveys.org/).

See also: Thematic map, Time series comparison

Find indicator:
Rank Country Value Year
1 Afghanistan 24.20 2014
2 Lesotho 17.30 2016
3 Congo 16.90 2009
4 Timor-Leste 15.20 2015
5 Nigeria 13.60 2014
6 Namibia 12.50 2014
7 Angola 12.40 2010
8 Central African Republic 12.00 2011
9 Sierra Leone 11.70 2017
10 Morocco 11.10 2019
11 South Africa 11.00 2020
12 Mauritius 10.50 2009
13 Samoa 10.30 2009
14 Nepal 10.20 2013
15 Côte d'Ivoire 10.10 2016
16 Iraq 10.00 2011
17 Tunisia 9.80 2013
18 Guinea 9.60 2016
19 Chad 9.50 2018
20 Liberia 9.30 2017
21 Indonesia 9.20 2015
22 Lebanon 9.10 2019
23 Cameroon 8.90 2016
24 Malaysia 8.50 2015
24 Malawi 8.50 2014
26 Suriname 8.40 2018
27 Dem. Rep. Congo 8.30 2013
28 Mozambique 8.00 2018
29 Mauritania 7.80 2014
29 Ghana 7.80 2013
31 Togo 7.30 2016
32 Uganda 7.20 2013
32 Honduras 7.20 2016
34 Bhutan 7.10 2015
34 Eswatini 7.10 2016
36 The Gambia 7.00 2018
37 Brazil 6.90 2009
38 Rwanda 6.80 2019
38 Tanzania 6.80 2013
38 Uzbekistan 6.80 2019
41 Dominican Republic 6.60 2016
42 Pakistan 6.50 2013
43 Vanuatu 6.40 2009
44 Cyprus 6.20 2019
45 Kyrgyz Republic 5.90 2019
45 Bolivia 5.90 2017
47 Panama 5.60 2010
48 Senegal 5.30 2014
48 Madagascar 5.30 2013
50 Kenya 4.90 2018
50 Yemen 4.90 2013
52 Papua New Guinea 4.80 2015
53 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 4.70 2010
54 Grenada 4.60 2010
54 Zimbabwe 4.60 2016
56 Tajikistan 4.50 2008
56 Niger 4.50 2017
56 Sudan 4.50 2014
56 Albania 4.50 2019
60 Djibouti 4.40 2013
61 Zambia 4.20 2019
62 Kazakhstan 4.10 2019
63 Tonga 4.00 2009
63 Guatemala 4.00 2017
63 Mali 4.00 2016
66 Cabo Verde 3.90 2009
66 Bangladesh 3.90 2013
68 Burundi 3.80 2014
69 Fiji 3.60 2009
69 Italy 3.60 2019
69 Egypt 3.60 2020
69 Venezuela 3.60 2010
69 Portugal 3.60 2019
69 Mexico 3.60 2010
75 Vietnam 3.50 2015
75 Ukraine 3.50 2019
75 Nicaragua 3.50 2016
75 Gabon 3.50 2009
79 Jamaica 3.40 2010
79 Ethiopia 3.40 2015
79 Poland 3.40 2019
82 Guinea-Bissau 3.30 2006
82 El Salvador 3.30 2016
84 Cambodia 3.20 2016
85 Burkina Faso 3.10 2009
85 Botswana 3.10 2010
85 Benin 3.10 2016
88 Azerbaijan 2.90 2013
89 Peru 2.80 2017
90 St. Kitts and Nevis 2.70 2010
90 India 2.70 2014
92 Solomon Islands 2.60 2015
92 Antigua and Barbuda 2.60 2010
92 Bulgaria 2.60 2019
95 Turkey 2.50 2019
95 Guyana 2.50 2010
97 Ecuador 2.30 2017
97 Paraguay 2.30 2017
97 Romania 2.30 2019
97 Moldova 2.30 2019
97 Lao PDR 2.30 2018
102 Uruguay 2.10 2017
102 Slovenia 2.10 2019
104 North Macedonia 2.00 2019
104 Belarus 2.00 2018
106 Slovak Republic 1.90 2019
106 Colombia 1.90 2017
108 Sri Lanka 1.80 2011
108 Argentina 1.80 2017
108 Luxembourg 1.80 2020
111 The Bahamas 1.70 2010
111 Chile 1.70 2010
111 Russia 1.70 2019
111 Trinidad and Tobago 1.70 2010
115 Malta 1.60 2019
115 St. Lucia 1.60 2010
117 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1.50 2019
118 Croatia 1.40 2019
119 Costa Rica 1.30 2010
119 Philippines 1.30 2015
119 Serbia 1.30 2019
119 Armenia 1.30 2020
119 Hungary 1.30 2019
119 Georgia 1.30 2019
125 Israel 1.20 2013
126 Jordan 1.10 2019
126 Belgium 1.10 2020
126 Myanmar 1.10 2016
126 Mongolia 1.10 2019
126 Estonia 1.10 2019
126 Greece 1.10 2018
132 Belize 1.00 2010
133 Montenegro 0.90 2019
133 Latvia 0.90 2019
133 Lithuania 0.90 2019
133 Czech Republic 0.90 2019
137 Thailand 0.80 2016
138 Finland 0.70 2020
138 Netherlands 0.70 2020
140 Denmark 0.60 2020
140 Sweden 0.60 2020
140 Barbados 0.60 2010
143 Ireland 0.50 2020
143 China 0.50 2012

More rankings: Africa | Asia | Central America & the Caribbean | Europe | Middle East | North America | Oceania | South America | World |

Development Relevance: Firms evaluating investment options, governments interested in improving business conditions, and economists seeking to explain economic performance have all grappled with defining and measuring the business environment. The firm-level data from Enterprise Surveys provide a useful tool for benchmarking economies across a large number of indicators measured at the firm level. Crime imposes costs on firms when they are forced to divert resources from productive uses to cover security costs. Both foreign and domestic investors perceive crime as an indication of social instability, and crime drives up the cost of doing business. Also, commercial disputes between firms and their clients occur regularly in the course of doing business. Resolving these disputes can be challenging when legal institutions are weak or nonexistent. Crime, theft, and disorder may impose additional costs to businesses and society, and consume considerable resources.

Limitations and Exceptions: The sampling methodology for Enterprise Surveys is stratified random sampling. In a simple random sample, all members of the population have the same probability of being selected and no weighting of the observations is necessary. In a stratified random sample, all population units are grouped within homogeneous groups and simple random samples are selected within each group. This method allows computing estimates for each of the strata with a specified level of precision while population estimates can also be estimated by properly weighting individual observations. The sampling weights take care of the varying probabilities of selection across different strata. Under certain conditions, estimates' precision under stratified random sampling will be higher than under simple random sampling (lower standard errors may result from the estimation procedure). The strata for Enterprise Surveys are firm size, business sector, and geographic region within a country. Firm size levels are 5-19 (small), 20-99 (medium), and 100+ employees (large-sized firms). Since in most economies, the majority of firms are small and medium-sized, Enterprise Surveys oversample large firms since larger firms tend to be engines of job creation. Sector breakdown is usually manufacturing, retail, and other services. For larger economies, specific manufacturing sub-sectors are selected as additional strata on the basis of employment, value-added, and total number of establishments figures. Geographic regions within a country are selected based on which cities/regions collectively contain the majority of economic activity. Ideally the survey sample frame is derived from the universe of eligible firms obtained from the country’s statistical office. Sometimes the master list of firms is obtained from other government agencies such as tax or business licensing authorities. In some cases, the list of firms is obtained from business associations or marketing databases. In a few cases, the sample frame is created via block enumeration, where the World Bank “manually” constructs a list of eligible firms after 1) partitioning a country’s cities of major economic activity into clusters and blocks, 2) randomly selecting a subset of blocks which will then be enumerated. In surveys conducted since 2005-06, survey documentation which explains the source of the sample frame and any special circumstances encountered during survey fieldwork are included with the collected datasets. Obtaining panel data, i.e. interviews with the same firms across multiple years, is a priority in current Enterprise Surveys. When conducting a new Enterprise Survey in a country where data was previously collected, maximal effort is expended to re-interview as many firms (from the prior survey) as possible. For these panel firms, sampling weights can be adjusted to take into account the resulting altered probabilities of inclusion in the sample frame.

Original Source Notes: All surveys were administered using the Enterprise Surveys methodology as outlined in the Methodology page which can be found from www.enterprisesurveys.org.

Statistical Concept and Methodology: Firm-level surveys have been conducted since the 1990's by different units within the World Bank. Since 2005-06, most data collection efforts have been centralized within the Enterprise Analysis Unit. Surveys implemented by the Enterprise Analysis Unit follow the Global Methodology. Private contractors conduct the Enterprise Surveys on behalf of the World Bank. Due to sensitive survey questions addressing business-government relations and bribery-related topics, private contractors, rather than any government agency or an organization/institution associated with government, are hired by the World Bank to collect the data. Confidentiality of the survey respondents and the sensitive information they provide is necessary to ensure the greatest degree of survey participation, integrity and confidence in the quality of the data. Surveys are usually carried out in cooperation with business organizations and government agencies promoting job creation and economic growth, but confidentiality is never compromised. The Enterprise Survey is answered by business owners and top managers. Sometimes the survey respondent calls company accountants and human resource managers into the interview to answer questions in the sales and labor sections of the survey. Typically 1200-1800 interviews are conducted in larger economies, 360 interviews are conducted in medium-sized economies, and for smaller economies, 150 interviews take place. The manufacturing and services sectors are the primary business sectors of interest. This corresponds to firms classified with ISIC codes 15-37, 45, 50-52, 55, 60-64, and 72 (ISIC Rev.3.1). Formal (registered) companies with 5 or more employees are targeted for interview. Services firms include construction, retail, wholesale, hotels, restaurants, transport, storage, communications, and IT. Firms with 100% government/state ownership are not eligible to participate in an Enterprise Survey. Occasionally, for a few surveyed countries, other sectors are included in the companies surveyed such as education or health-related businesses. In each country, businesses in the cities/regions of major economic activity are interviewed. In some countries, other surveys, which depart from the usual Enterprise Survey methodology, are conducted. Examples include 1) Informal Surveys- surveys of informal (unregistered) enterprises, 2) Micro Surveys- surveys fielded to registered firms with less than five employees, and 3) Financial Crisis Assessment Surveys- short surveys administered by telephone to assess the effects of the global financial crisis of 2008-09. The Enterprise Surveys Unit uses two instruments: the Manufacturing Questionnaire and the Services Questionnaire. Although many questions overlap, some are only applicable to one type of business. For example, retail firms are not asked about production and nonproduction workers. The standard Enterprise Survey topics include firm characteristics, gender participation, access to finance, annual sales, costs of inputs/labor, workforce composition, bribery, licensing, infrastructure, trade, crime, competition, capacity utilization, land and permits, taxation, informality, business-government relations, innovation and technology, and performance measures. Over 90% of the questions objectively ascertain characteristics of a country’s business environment. The remaining questions assess the survey respondents’ opinions on what are the obstacles to firm growth and performance. The mode of data collection is face-to-face interviews.

Aggregation method: Unweighted average

Periodicity: Annual