Power outages in firms in a typical month (number) - Country Ranking

Definition: Power outages are the average number of power outages that establishments experience in a typical month.

Source: World Bank, Enterprise Surveys (http://www.enterprisesurveys.org/).

See also: Thematic map, Time series comparison

Find indicator:
Rank Country Value Year
1 Pakistan 75.20 2013
2 Bangladesh 64.50 2013
3 Papua New Guinea 41.90 2015
4 Iraq 40.90 2011
5 Yemen 38.80 2013
6 Nigeria 32.80 2014
7 Central African Republic 29.00 2011
8 Benin 28.00 2016
9 Niger 22.00 2017
10 Congo 21.50 2009
11 The Gambia 21.10 2018
12 Burundi 16.60 2014
13 India 13.80 2014
14 Zambia 13.30 2019
15 Dem. Rep. Congo 12.30 2013
16 Afghanistan 11.50 2014
17 Myanmar 11.00 2016
18 Burkina Faso 9.80 2009
19 Sierra Leone 9.10 2017
20 Tanzania 8.90 2013
21 Nepal 8.70 2013
22 Guyana 8.50 2010
23 Ghana 8.40 2013
24 Ethiopia 8.20 2015
25 South Africa 7.70 2020
26 Cameroon 7.60 2016
27 Dominican Republic 7.40 2016
28 Madagascar 6.70 2013
28 Malawi 6.70 2014
30 Uganda 6.30 2013
31 Senegal 6.00 2014
32 Togo 5.50 2016
33 Mauritania 5.30 2014
34 Guinea-Bissau 5.20 2006
35 Solomon Islands 4.90 2015
36 Angola 4.70 2010
37 Gabon 4.60 2009
37 Samoa 4.60 2009
39 Guinea 4.50 2016
39 Chad 4.50 2018
39 Zimbabwe 4.50 2016
39 Liberia 4.50 2017
43 St. Kitts and Nevis 4.20 2010
43 Mali 4.20 2016
45 Sri Lanka 4.10 2011
45 Botswana 4.10 2010
47 Kenya 3.80 2018
48 Eswatini 3.70 2016
49 Côte d'Ivoire 3.50 2016
50 Sudan 3.40 2014
51 Cabo Verde 3.20 2009
51 Algeria 3.20 2007
53 St. Lucia 3.00 2010
54 Suriname 2.80 2018
54 Dominica 2.80 2010
54 Antigua and Barbuda 2.80 2010
57 Venezuela 2.60 2010
58 Belize 2.50 2010
58 Armenia 2.50 2020
58 Jamaica 2.50 2010
61 Rwanda 2.40 2019
61 Honduras 2.40 2016
63 Georgia 2.20 2019
63 The Bahamas 2.20 2010
63 Lesotho 2.20 2016
66 Azerbaijan 2.10 2019
67 Tonga 2.00 2009
68 Uzbekistan 1.90 2019
69 Paraguay 1.70 2017
69 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 1.70 2010
71 Vanuatu 1.60 2009
71 Djibouti 1.60 2013
71 Mozambique 1.60 2018
71 Brazil 1.60 2009
71 Mexico 1.60 2010
71 Nicaragua 1.60 2016
77 Albania 1.50 2019
78 Fiji 1.40 2009
78 Cambodia 1.40 2016
80 Tajikistan 1.30 2019
80 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1.30 2019
80 Guatemala 1.30 2017
80 Costa Rica 1.30 2010
84 Ecuador 1.20 2017
84 Mauritius 1.20 2009
84 Romania 1.20 2019
84 El Salvador 1.20 2016
88 North Macedonia 1.10 2019
88 Barbados 1.10 2010
90 Kyrgyz Republic 0.90 2019
90 Tunisia 0.90 2020
90 Greece 0.90 2018
93 Egypt 0.80 2020
93 Colombia 0.80 2017
93 Bulgaria 0.80 2019
93 Argentina 0.80 2017
93 Uruguay 0.80 2017
93 Timor-Leste 0.80 2015
99 Grenada 0.70 2010
99 Chile 0.70 2010
99 Serbia 0.70 2019
99 Turkey 0.70 2019
103 Panama 0.60 2010
103 Moldova 0.60 2019
103 Montenegro 0.60 2019
103 Lebanon 0.60 2019
103 Bolivia 0.60 2017
103 Hungary 0.60 2019
103 Czech Republic 0.60 2019
103 Namibia 0.60 2014
111 Mongolia 0.50 2019
111 Trinidad and Tobago 0.50 2010
111 Ukraine 0.50 2019
111 Slovak Republic 0.50 2019
111 Eritrea 0.50 2009
111 Indonesia 0.50 2015
111 Kazakhstan 0.50 2019
111 Peru 0.50 2017
119 Bhutan 0.40 2015
120 Lithuania 0.30 2019
120 Morocco 0.30 2019
120 Slovenia 0.30 2019
120 Portugal 0.30 2019
124 Russia 0.20 2019
124 Malta 0.20 2019
124 Belgium 0.20 2020
124 Belarus 0.20 2018
124 Cyprus 0.20 2019
124 Finland 0.20 2020
124 Croatia 0.20 2019
124 Latvia 0.20 2019
124 Lao PDR 0.20 2018
124 Poland 0.20 2019
124 Thailand 0.20 2016
124 Vietnam 0.20 2015
124 Jordan 0.20 2019
137 Ireland 0.10 2020
137 Israel 0.10 2013
137 Luxembourg 0.10 2020
137 Malaysia 0.10 2015
137 Estonia 0.10 2019
137 China 0.10 2012
137 Netherlands 0.10 2020
137 Philippines 0.10 2015
145 Denmark 0.00 2020
145 Sweden 0.00 2020
145 Italy 0.00 2019

More rankings: Africa | Asia | Central America & the Caribbean | Europe | Middle East | North America | Oceania | South America | World |

Development Relevance: Firms evaluating investment options, governments interested in improving business conditions, and economists seeking to explain economic performance have all grappled with defining and measuring the business environment. The firm-level data from Enterprise Surveys provide a useful tool for benchmarking economies across a large number of indicators measured at the firm level. International trade can be beneficial for firms in terms of less expensive inputs for manufacturing and new markets for exporting finished products and services. Time spent waiting for imports and exports to clear customs can be costly for firms and deter them from engaging in trade or making them uncompetitive globally.

Limitations and Exceptions: The sampling methodology for Enterprise Surveys is stratified random sampling. In a simple random sample, all members of the population have the same probability of being selected and no weighting of the observations is necessary. In a stratified random sample, all population units are grouped within homogeneous groups and simple random samples are selected within each group. This method allows computing estimates for each of the strata with a specified level of precision while population estimates can also be estimated by properly weighting individual observations. The sampling weights take care of the varying probabilities of selection across different strata. Under certain conditions, estimates' precision under stratified random sampling will be higher than under simple random sampling (lower standard errors may result from the estimation procedure). The strata for Enterprise Surveys are firm size, business sector, and geographic region within a country. Firm size levels are 5-19 (small), 20-99 (medium), and 100+ employees (large-sized firms). Since in most economies, the majority of firms are small and medium-sized, Enterprise Surveys oversample large firms since larger firms tend to be engines of job creation. Sector breakdown is usually manufacturing, retail, and other services. For larger economies, specific manufacturing sub-sectors are selected as additional strata on the basis of employment, value-added, and total number of establishments figures. Geographic regions within a country are selected based on which cities/regions collectively contain the majority of economic activity. Ideally the survey sample frame is derived from the universe of eligible firms obtained from the country’s statistical office. Sometimes the master list of firms is obtained from other government agencies such as tax or business licensing authorities. In some cases, the list of firms is obtained from business associations or marketing databases. In a few cases, the sample frame is created via block enumeration, where the World Bank “manually” constructs a list of eligible firms after 1) partitioning a country’s cities of major economic activity into clusters and blocks, 2) randomly selecting a subset of blocks which will then be enumerated. In surveys conducted since 2005-06, survey documentation which explains the source of the sample frame and any special circumstances encountered during survey fieldwork are included with the collected datasets. Obtaining panel data, i.e. interviews with the same firms across multiple years, is a priority in current Enterprise Surveys. When conducting a new Enterprise Survey in a country where data was previously collected, maximal effort is expended to re-interview as many firms (from the prior survey) as possible. For these panel firms, sampling weights can be adjusted to take into account the resulting altered probabilities of inclusion in the sample frame.

Original Source Notes: All surveys were administered using the Enterprise Surveys methodology as outlined in the Methodology page which can be found from www.enterprisesurveys.org.

Statistical Concept and Methodology: Firm-level surveys have been conducted since the 1990's by different units within the World Bank. Since 2005-06, most data collection efforts have been centralized within the Enterprise Analysis Unit. Surveys implemented by the Enterprise Analysis Unit follow the Global Methodology. Private contractors conduct the Enterprise Surveys on behalf of the World Bank. Due to sensitive survey questions addressing business-government relations and bribery-related topics, private contractors, rather than any government agency or an organization/institution associated with government, are hired by the World Bank to collect the data. Confidentiality of the survey respondents and the sensitive information they provide is necessary to ensure the greatest degree of survey participation, integrity and confidence in the quality of the data. Surveys are usually carried out in cooperation with business organizations and government agencies promoting job creation and economic growth, but confidentiality is never compromised. The Enterprise Survey is answered by business owners and top managers. Sometimes the survey respondent calls company accountants and human resource managers into the interview to answer questions in the sales and labor sections of the survey. Typically 1200-1800 interviews are conducted in larger economies, 360 interviews are conducted in medium-sized economies, and for smaller economies, 150 interviews take place. The manufacturing and services sectors are the primary business sectors of interest. This corresponds to firms classified with ISIC codes 15-37, 45, 50-52, 55, 60-64, and 72 (ISIC Rev.3.1). Formal (registered) companies with 5 or more employees are targeted for interview. Services firms include construction, retail, wholesale, hotels, restaurants, transport, storage, communications, and IT. Firms with 100% government/state ownership are not eligible to participate in an Enterprise Survey. Occasionally, for a few surveyed countries, other sectors are included in the companies surveyed such as education or health-related businesses. In each country, businesses in the cities/regions of major economic activity are interviewed. In some countries, other surveys, which depart from the usual Enterprise Survey methodology, are conducted. Examples include 1) Informal Surveys- surveys of informal (unregistered) enterprises, 2) Micro Surveys- surveys fielded to registered firms with less than five employees, and 3) Financial Crisis Assessment Surveys- short surveys administered by telephone to assess the effects of the global financial crisis of 2008-09. The Enterprise Surveys Unit uses two instruments: the Manufacturing Questionnaire and the Services Questionnaire. Although many questions overlap, some are only applicable to one type of business. For example, retail firms are not asked about production and nonproduction workers. The standard Enterprise Survey topics include firm characteristics, gender participation, access to finance, annual sales, costs of inputs/labor, workforce composition, bribery, licensing, infrastructure, trade, crime, competition, capacity utilization, land and permits, taxation, informality, business-government relations, innovation and technology, and performance measures. Over 90% of the questions objectively ascertain characteristics of a country’s business environment. The remaining questions assess the survey respondents’ opinions on what are the obstacles to firm growth and performance. The mode of data collection is face-to-face interviews.

Aggregation method: Unweighted average

Periodicity: Annual