Fish species, threatened - Country Ranking

Definition: Fish species are based on Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (eds). 2008. Threatened species are the number of species classified by the IUCN as endangered, vulnerable, rare, indeterminate, out of danger, or insufficiently known.

Source: Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (eds). 2008. FishBase database, www.fishbase.org.

See also: Thematic map, Time series comparison

Find indicator:
Rank Country Value Year
1 United States 251.00 2018
2 India 227.00 2018
3 Mexico 181.00 2018
4 Tanzania 179.00 2018
5 Indonesia 166.00 2018
6 China 136.00 2018
7 Turkey 131.00 2018
8 Australia 125.00 2018
9 Cameroon 122.00 2018
10 South Africa 121.00 2018
11 Madagascar 111.00 2018
12 Thailand 106.00 2018
13 Colombia 99.00 2018
14 Dem. Rep. Congo 94.00 2018
15 Brazil 93.00 2018
16 Philippines 91.00 2018
17 Malaysia 87.00 2018
18 Vietnam 83.00 2018
18 Spain 83.00 2018
20 Greece 80.00 2018
21 Japan 77.00 2018
22 Guinea 76.00 2018
23 Kenya 74.00 2018
23 Nigeria 74.00 2018
25 Mozambique 72.00 2018
25 Gabon 72.00 2018
27 Portugal 67.00 2018
28 Costa Rica 64.00 2018
28 Croatia 64.00 2018
28 Liberia 64.00 2018
31 Papua New Guinea 61.00 2018
31 Ecuador 61.00 2018
33 Uganda 60.00 2018
34 Côte d'Ivoire 59.00 2018
35 Ghana 58.00 2018
35 Egypt 58.00 2018
35 Senegal 58.00 2018
38 Panama 57.00 2018
38 Sri Lanka 57.00 2018
38 Congo 57.00 2018
38 Sierra Leone 57.00 2018
42 Lao PDR 55.00 2018
43 Morocco 54.00 2018
44 Myanmar 53.00 2018
44 France 53.00 2018
44 Angola 53.00 2018
47 Peru 52.00 2018
47 Italy 52.00 2018
49 Syrian Arab Republic 51.00 2018
50 Israel 50.00 2018
51 Cambodia 48.00 2018
51 United Kingdom 48.00 2018
53 Iran 47.00 2018
54 Pakistan 46.00 2018
55 Honduras 45.00 2018
55 Uruguay 45.00 2018
55 Belize 45.00 2018
55 Mauritania 45.00 2018
55 Venezuela 45.00 2018
60 Canada 44.00 2018
60 Equatorial Guinea 44.00 2018
60 Albania 44.00 2018
60 Cuba 44.00 2018
64 The Bahamas 43.00 2018
65 Argentina 42.00 2018
66 Algeria 41.00 2018
66 Guinea-Bissau 41.00 2018
66 Guatemala 41.00 2018
66 Saudi Arabia 41.00 2018
70 Yemen 40.00 2018
70 Nicaragua 40.00 2018
70 Benin 40.00 2018
73 Tunisia 39.00 2018
73 Russia 39.00 2018
75 Togo 38.00 2018
75 New Zealand 38.00 2018
77 New Caledonia 37.00 2018
77 Trinidad and Tobago 37.00 2018
79 Oman 36.00 2018
79 Bosnia and Herzegovina 36.00 2018
79 Malawi 36.00 2018
82 The Gambia 35.00 2018
82 Cabo Verde 35.00 2018
84 Slovenia 33.00 2018
84 Guyana 33.00 2018
84 Namibia 33.00 2018
87 Libya 32.00 2018
87 Montenegro 32.00 2018
87 Sudan 32.00 2018
87 Puerto Rico 32.00 2018
87 Suriname 32.00 2018
92 Somalia 31.00 2018
92 Cayman Islands 31.00 2018
92 Dominica 31.00 2018
92 Antigua and Barbuda 31.00 2018
96 Haiti 30.00 2018
96 Jamaica 30.00 2018
96 St. Kitts and Nevis 30.00 2018
96 St. Lucia 30.00 2018
100 Grenada 29.00 2018
100 Bangladesh 29.00 2018
100 Eritrea 29.00 2018
100 Barbados 29.00 2018
100 Dominican Republic 29.00 2018
100 Singapore 29.00 2018
100 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 29.00 2018
107 Ireland 28.00 2018
107 Korea 28.00 2018
107 Lebanon 28.00 2018
110 Chile 27.00 2018
111 São Tomé and Principe 25.00 2018
112 Solomon Islands 24.00 2018
112 Ukraine 24.00 2018
112 Seychelles 24.00 2018
112 Cyprus 24.00 2018
112 Germany 24.00 2018
117 Norway 23.00 2018
117 Djibouti 23.00 2018
119 Romania 22.00 2018
119 Malta 22.00 2018
119 Bulgaria 22.00 2018
122 Mauritius 21.00 2018
122 Palau 21.00 2018
124 Fiji 20.00 2018
124 United Arab Emirates 20.00 2018
124 Dem. People's Rep. Korea 20.00 2018
124 Zambia 20.00 2018
124 Jordan 20.00 2018
129 Iraq 19.00 2018
130 Kuwait 18.00 2018
130 Denmark 18.00 2018
130 Vanuatu 18.00 2018
133 Qatar 17.00 2018
133 Burundi 17.00 2018
133 El Salvador 17.00 2018
136 Tonga 16.00 2018
136 Samoa 16.00 2018
136 Iceland 16.00 2018
139 Netherlands 15.00 2018
139 Hong Kong SAR, China 15.00 2018
139 Sweden 15.00 2018
139 Serbia 15.00 2018
139 Monaco 15.00 2018
144 Kazakhstan 14.00 2018
144 Kiribati 14.00 2018
144 Ethiopia 14.00 2018
144 Azerbaijan 14.00 2018
144 Brunei 14.00 2018
144 Bahrain 14.00 2018
150 Tuvalu 13.00 2018
150 Timor-Leste 13.00 2018
150 Belgium 13.00 2018
150 North Macedonia 13.00 2018
150 Turkmenistan 13.00 2018
155 Comoros 11.00 2018
155 Nauru 11.00 2018
155 Austria 11.00 2018
155 Georgia 11.00 2018
159 Hungary 9.00 2018
159 Switzerland 9.00 2018
159 Greenland 9.00 2018
159 Macao SAR, China 9.00 2018
163 Bolivia 8.00 2018
163 Moldova 8.00 2018
163 Poland 8.00 2018
166 Uzbekistan 7.00 2018
166 Rwanda 7.00 2018
166 Nepal 7.00 2018
169 Finland 6.00 2018
169 Lithuania 6.00 2018
169 Latvia 6.00 2018
172 Estonia 5.00 2018
172 Eswatini 5.00 2018
172 Slovak Republic 5.00 2018
172 Tajikistan 5.00 2018
176 Burkina Faso 4.00 2018
176 Afghanistan 4.00 2018
176 Niger 4.00 2018
179 Armenia 3.00 2018
179 Kyrgyz Republic 3.00 2018
179 Bhutan 3.00 2018
179 Central African Republic 3.00 2018
179 Zimbabwe 3.00 2018
184 Botswana 2.00 2018
184 Czech Republic 2.00 2018
184 Mongolia 2.00 2018
184 Mali 2.00 2018
184 Belarus 2.00 2018
189 Chad 1.00 2018
189 Lesotho 1.00 2018
189 Luxembourg 1.00 2018
192 Liechtenstein 0.00 2018
192 San Marino 0.00 2018
192 Paraguay 0.00 2018
192 Andorra 0.00 2018

More rankings: Africa | Asia | Central America & the Caribbean | Europe | Middle East | North America | Oceania | South America | World |

Development Relevance: As threats to biodiversity mount, the international community is increasingly focusing on conserving diversity. The Red List Index for the world's birds shows that there has been a steady and continuing deterioration in the threat status of the world's birds since 1988, when the first complete global assessment was carried out. The number of threatened species is an important measure of the immediate need for conservation in an area. Global analyses of the status of threatened species have been carried out for few groups of organisms. Only for mammals, birds, and amphibians has the status of virtually all known species been assessed. Threatened species are defined using the International Union for Conservation of Nature's (IUCN) classification: endangered (in danger of extinction and unlikely to survive if causal factors continue operating) and vulnerable (likely to move into the endangered category in the near future if causal factors continue operating). The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species is widely recognized as the most comprehensive, objective global approach for evaluating the conservation status of plant and animal species. The IUCN guides conservation activities of governments, NGOs and scientific institutions. The introduction in 1994 of a scientifically rigorous approach to determine risks of extinction that is applicable to all species, has become a world standard. The IUCN draws on and mobilizes a network of scientists and partner organizations working in almost every country in the world, who collectively hold what is likely the most complete scientific knowledge base on the biology and conservation status of species. The freshwater system represents the most threatened of all ecosystems, and many freshwater species have a very high livelihood value for local human communities. IUCN's freshwater focus is on the following taxonomic groups: fish; molluscs; crabs and crayfish; and dragonflies. Global assessment of these groups is being pursued through a series of regional projects, such as one for Africa that is currently being implemented. The marine realm is poorly covered in the IUCN Red List, comprising less than 5 percent of the species included. IUCN has identified priority taxonomic groups of marine fish, invertebrates, plants (mangroves and seagrasses) and macro-algae (seaweeds). If these priority groups can be assessed, the number of marine species on the IUCN Red List will be increased more than six-fold. Direct threats to species are the proximate human activities or processes that have impacted, are impacting, or may impact the status of the taxon being assessed (e.g., unsustainable fishing or logging). Direct threats are synonymous with sources of stress and proximate pressures. Threats can be past (historical, unlikely to return or historical, likely to return), ongoing, and/or likely to occur in the future.

Limitations and Exceptions: Reporting the proportion of threatened species on the Red List is complicated by the fact that not all species groups have been fully evaluated, and also by the fact that some species have so little information available that they can only be assessed as Data Deficient (DD). For many of the incompletely evaluated groups, assessment efforts have focused on species that are likely to be threatened; therefore any percentage of threatened species reported for these groups would be heavily biased (i.e., the percentage of threatened species would likely be an overestimate). Since IUCN has evaluated extinction risk for less than 5 percent of the world's described species, IUCN cannot provide an overall estimate for how many of the planet's species are threatened. For those groups that have been comprehensively evaluated, the proportion of threatened species can be calculated, but the number of threatened species is often uncertain because it is not known whether Data Deficient species are actually threatened or not. Due to variations in consistency and methods of collection, data quality is highly variable across countries. Some countries update their information more frequently than others, some have more accurate data on extent of coverage, and many underreport the number or extent of protected areas. Also, because of differences in definitions, reporting practices, and reporting periods, cross-country comparability of threatened species is limited. In order to ensure global uniformity when describing the habitat in which a taxon (a taxonomic group of any rank) occurs, the threats to a taxon, what conservation actions are in place or are needed, and whether or not the taxon is utilized, a set of standard terms, called Classification Schemes, are being developed, for documenting taxonomy on the IUCN Red List.

Statistical Concept and Methodology: Species assessed as Critically Endangered (CR), Endangered (EN) or Vulnerable (VU) are referred to as "threatened" species. The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species collects and disseminates information on the global threated species. Proportion of threatened species is only reported for the more completely evaluated groups (i.e., >90% of species evaluated). Also, the reported percentage of threatened species for each group is presented as a best estimate within a range of possible values bounded by lower and upper estimates: Lower estimate = % threatened extant species if all Data Deficient species are not threatened, i.e., (CR + EN + VU) / (total assessed - EX) Best estimate = % threatened extant species if Data Deficient species are equally threatened as data sufficient species, i.e., (CR + EN + VU) / (total assessed - EX - DD) Upper estimate = % threatened extant species if all Data Deficient species are threatened, i.e., (CR + EN + VU + DD) / (total assessed - EX) Additional information on ecology and habitat preferences, threats, and conservation action are also collated and assessed as part of Red List process.

Aggregation method: Sum

Periodicity: Annual