![]() |
Home > Minerals > Recycling-Metals >
| TABLE 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| SALIENT U.S. RECYCLING STATISTICS FOR SELECTED METALS1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Quantity of metal | Value of metal | |||||||||||||||||||
| (metric tons) | (thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Recycled from | Recycled from | Apparent | Percentage | Recycled from | Recycled from | Apparent | ||||||||||||||
| Year | new scrap2 | old scrap3 | Recycled4 | supply5 | recycled | new scrap2 | old scrap3 | Recycled4 | supply6 | |||||||||||
| Aluminum:7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2001 | 1,760,000 | 1,210,000 | ####### | 7,990,000 | 37 | 2,670,000 | 1,830,000 | ####### | ####### | |||||||||||
| 2002 | 1,750,000 | 1,170,000 | ####### | 8,070,000 | 36 | 2,510,000 | 1,680,000 | ####### | ####### | |||||||||||
| 2003 | 1,750,000 | 1,070,000 | ####### | 7,880,000 | 36 | 2,620,000 | 1,610,000 | ####### | ####### | |||||||||||
| 2004 | 1,870,000 | 1,160,000 | ####### | 8,460,000 | 36 | 3,640,000 | 2,140,000 | ####### | ####### | |||||||||||
| 2005 | 1,930,000 | 1,060,000 | ####### | 8,390,000 | 36 | 3,870,000 | 2,140,000 | ####### | ####### | |||||||||||
| Chromium:8 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2001 | NA | NA� | 141,000 | 532,000 | r | 27 | r | NA� | NA� | 81,900 | 223,000 | |||||||||
| 2002 | NA | NA� | 174,000 | 479,000 | 36 | NA� | NA� | 95,100 | 293,000 | |||||||||||
| 2003 | NA | NA� | 180,000 | 532,000 | 34 | NA� | NA� | 139,000 | 429,000 | |||||||||||
| 2004 | NA | NA� | 168,000 | 555,000 | 30 | NA� | NA� | 207,000 | 681,000 | |||||||||||
| 2005 | NA | NA� | 124,000 | 511,000 | 24 | NA� | NA� | 162,000 | 717,000 | |||||||||||
| Copper:9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2001 | 833,000 | 317,000 | ####### | 3,340,000 | 34.4 | 1,410,000 | 536,000 | ####### | ####### | |||||||||||
| 2002 | 842,000 | 208,000 | ####### | 3,450,000 | 30.4 | 1,410,000 | 348,000 | ####### | ####### | |||||||||||
| 2003 | 738,000 | 206,000 | 944,000 | 3,170,000 | 29.8 | 1,390,000 | 387,000 | ####### | ####### | |||||||||||
| 2004 | 774,000 | 191,000 | 965,000 | 3,330,000 | 28.9 | 2,290,000 | 565,000 | ####### | ####### | |||||||||||
| 2005 | 769,000 | 182,000 | 951,000 | 3,170,000 | 30.0 | 2,940,000 | 698,000 | ####### | ####### | |||||||||||
| Iron and steel | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2001 | NA | NA | ####### | ######## | 60 | NA | NA | ####### | ####### | |||||||||||
| 2002 | NA | NA | ####### | r | ######## | 58 | NA | NA | ####### | ####### | ||||||||||
| 200311 | NA | NA | ####### | ######## | 56 | NA | NA | ####### | r | ####### | ||||||||||
| 200411 | NA | NA | ####### | r | ######## | 51 | NA | NA | ####### | r | ####### | |||||||||
| 2005 | NA | NA | ####### | ######## | 54 | NA | NA | ####### | ####### | |||||||||||
| Lead:12 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2001 | 55,300 | 1,040,000 | ####### | 1,670,000 | 75.6 | 53,200 | 1,010,000 | ####### | ####### | |||||||||||
| 2002 | 42,600 | 1,070,000 | ####### | 1,540,000 | 81.2 | 40,900 | 1,030,000 | ####### | ####### | |||||||||||
| 2003r | 19,300 | 1,120,000 | ####### | 1,520,000 | 77.4 | 18,600 | 1,080,000 | ####### | ####### | |||||||||||
| 2004 | 12,900 | 1,110,000 | r | ####### | r | 1,460,000 | r | 77.3 | r | 15,600 | 1,350,000 | r | ####### | r | ####### | r | ||||
| 2005 | 15,700 | 1,130,000 | ####### | 1,540,000 | 74.5 | 21,100 | 1,520,000 | ####### | ####### | |||||||||||
| Magnesium:1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2001 | 38,600 | 27,200 | 65,800 | 151,000 | 44 | 106,000 | 75,000 | 181,000 | 416,000 | |||||||||||
| 2002 | 47,100 | 26,400 | 73,600 | 148,000 | 50 | 126,000 | 70,500 | 196,000 | 395,000 | |||||||||||
| 2003 | 44,700 | 25,400 | 70,100 | 152,000 | 46 | 107,000 | 60,900 | 168,000 | 366,000 | |||||||||||
| 2004 | 51,500 | r | 20,500 | r | 72,000 | r | 179,000 | r | 40 | 167,000 | 66,400 | 233,000 | r | 582,000 | r | |||||
| 2005 | 53,400 | 19,400 | 72,800 | 167,000 | 44 | 172,000 | 62,500 | 234,000 | 538,000 | |||||||||||
| Nickel:14 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2001 | NA | NA | 81,200 | 210,000 | 39 | NA | NA | 483,000 | ####### | |||||||||||
| 2002r | NA | NA | 83,900 | 205,000 | 41 | NA | NA | 568,000 | ####### | |||||||||||
| 2003 | NA | NA | 83,500 | 200,000 | r | 42 | NA | NA | 804,000 | ####### | r | |||||||||
| 2004 | NA | NA | 83,300 | 212,000 | r | 39 | NA | NA | ####### | ####### | r | |||||||||
| 2005 | NA | NA | 77,300 | 214,000 | 36 | NA | NA | ####### | ####### | |||||||||||
| Tin:15 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2001 | 7,210 | 6,700 | 13,900 | 46,300 | 30 | 24,400 | 29,900 | 54,300 | 316,000 | |||||||||||
| 2002 | 3,790 | 6,760 | 10,600 | 49,100 | 22 | 18,400 | 40,600 | 59,000 | 307,000 | |||||||||||
| 2003 | 3,570 | 5,500 | 9,070 | 41,500 | 22 | 26,800 | 41,200 | 68,000 | 311,000 | |||||||||||
| 2004 | 3,590 | 5,240 | r | 8,830 | r | 53,800 | r | 16 | 43,300 | r | 63,200 | r | 107,000 | r | 649,000 | r | ||||
| 2005 | 2,280 | 11,800 | 14,000 | 46,500 | 30 | 24,300 | 125,000 | 150,000 | 495,000 | |||||||||||
| Titanium:16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2001 | NA | NA | 17,000 | W | 39 | NA | NA | 35,200 | e | NA | ||||||||||
| 2002 | NA | NA | 11,600 | W | 40 | NA | NA | 25,600 | e | NA | ||||||||||
| 2003 | NA | NA | 14,300 | W | 46 | NA | NA | 48,000 | e | NA | ||||||||||
| 2004 | NA | NA | 18,300 | r | W | 46 | r | NA | NA | 127,000 | e | NA | ||||||||
| 2005 | NA | NA | 25,700 | W | 50 | NA | NA | 445,000 | NA | |||||||||||
| See footnotes at end of table. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| TABLE 1�Continued | ||||||||||||||||||||
| SALIENT U.S. RECYCLING STATISTICS FOR SELECTED METALS1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Quantity of metal | Value of metal | |||||||||||||||||||
| (metric tons) | (thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Recycled from | Recycled from | Apparent | Percentage | Recycled from | Recycled from | Apparent | ||||||||||||||
| Year | new scrap2 | old scrap3 | Recycled4 | supply5 | recycled | new scrap2 | old scrap3 | Recycled4 | supply6 | |||||||||||
| Zinc:17 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2001r | 317,000 | 57,000 | 375,000 | 1,420,000 | 26.4 | 307,000 | 55,200 | 362,000 | ####### | |||||||||||
| 2002 | 319,000 | 47,300 | 366,000 | 1,420,000 | 25.8 | 272,000 | 40,300 | 312,000 | ####### | |||||||||||
| 2003 | 295,000 | 50,300 | 345,000 | 1,340,000 | 25.8 | 264,000 | 45,100 | 309,000 | ####### | |||||||||||
| 2004 | 302,000 | 47,100 | 349,000 | 1,400,000 | 24.9 | 350,000 | r | 54,500 | r | 404,000 | r | ####### | r | |||||||
| 2005 | 302,000 | 43,100 | 345,000 | 1,170,000 | 29.5 | 446,000 | 63,700 | 510,000 | ####### | |||||||||||
| eEstimated.� rRevised.� NA Not available.� W Withheld to avoid disclosing company proprietary data. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1Data are rounded to no more than three significant digits; may not add to totals shown. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2Scrap that results from the manufacturing process, including metal and alloy production.� New scrap of aluminum, copper, lead, tin, and zinc excludes home scrap, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| which is scrap generated and recycled in the metal producing plant. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 3Scrap that results from consumer products. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 4Metal recovered from new plus old scrap. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 5Apparent supply is production plus net imports plus stock changes.� Production is primary production plus recycled metal.� Net imports are imports minus exports. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Apparent supply is calculated on a contained-weight basis. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 6Same as apparent supply defined in footnote 5 above but calculated based on a monetary value. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 7Quantity of metal is the calculated metallic recovery from purchased new and old aluminum-base scrap, estimated for full industry coverage.� Monetary value is | ||||||||||||||||||||
| estimated based on average U.S. market price for primary aluminum metal ingot. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 8Chromium scrap includes estimated chromium content of stainless steel scrap receipts (reported by the iron and steel and pig iron industries) where chromium | ||||||||||||||||||||
| content was estimated to be 17%.� Trade includes reported or estimated chromium content of chromite ore, ferrochromium, chromium metal and scrap, and a variety | ||||||||||||||||||||
| of chromium-containing chemicals.� Stocks include estimated chromium content of reported and estimated producer, consumer, and Government stocks.� Recycled | ||||||||||||||||||||
| value calculated from quantity using the average annual import value of high-carbon ferrochromium.� Apparent supply value calculated from quantity using average | ||||||||||||||||||||
| annual trade value. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 9Includes copper recovered from unalloyed and alloyed copper-base scrap, as refined copper or in alloy forms, as well as copper recovered from aluminum-, nickel-, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| and zinc-base scrap.� Monetary value based on annual average refined copper prices. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 10Iron production measured as shipments of iron and steel products plus castings corrected for imported ingots and blooms.� Secondary production measured as | ||||||||||||||||||||
| reported consumption.� Apparent supply includes production of raw steel. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 11Before 2003, monetary value based on U.S. annual average composite price for No. 1 heavy-melting steel calculated from prices published in American Metal | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Market. After 2002, monetary value based on mass-weighted average of steel trade (exports plus imports) of selected Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United | ||||||||||||||||||||
| States (HTS) categories.� Recycled unit value based on HTS 7204 by year and per metric ton was 2003�$172 and 2004�$252.� Steel production unit value based | ||||||||||||||||||||
| in HTS 7206 and 7207 by year and per metric ton was 2003�$259; 2004�$679.� Apparent supply value is mass weighted-average of recycled production unit | ||||||||||||||||||||
| values. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 12Lead processors are segregated by primary and secondary producers.� This segregation permits inclusion of stock changes for secondary producers.� Monetary | ||||||||||||||||||||
| value of scrap and apparent supply estimated based upon average quoted price of common lead. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 13Includes magnesium content of aluminum-base scrap.� Monetary value based on the annual average Platts Metals Week's U.S. spot Western price. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 14Nickel statistics were derived from the following: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Canvass data | ||||||||||||||||||||
| �Reported nickel content of products made from reclaimed stainless steel dust, spent nickel-cadmium batteries, plating solutions, and other products. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| �Estimated nickel content of reported net receipts of alloy and stainless steel scrap. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| �Reported nickel content of recovered copper-base scrap. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| �Reported nickel content of obsolete and prompt purchased nickel-base scrap. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| �Estimated nickel content of various types of reported obsolete and prompt aluminum scrap. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Trade data | ||||||||||||||||||||
| �Reported nickel content of International Nickel Study Group (INSG) class I primary products, including briquets, cathode, flake, pellets, and powder. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| �Reported or estimated nickel content of INSG class II primary products, including ferronickel, metallurgical-grade nickel oxide, and a variety of nickel- | ||||||||||||||||||||
| containing chemicals. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| �Estimated nickel content of secondary products, including nickel waste and scrap and stainless steel scrap.� | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock data | ||||||||||||||||||||
| �Reported or estimated nickel content of all scrap stocks, except copper. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| �Reported nickel content of primary products held by world producers in U.S. warehouses. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| �Reported nickel content of primary products held by U.S. consumers. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| �Reported nickel content of U.S. Government stocks. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Monetary value based on annual average cash price for cathode, as reported by the London Metal Exchange.� | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 15Monetary value based on Platts Metals Week composite price for tin. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 16Percentage recycled based on titanium scrap consumed divided by primary sponge and scrap consumption. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 17Monetary value based on annual average Platts Metal Week metal price for North American special high-grade zinc. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Source: United States Geological Survey Mineral Resources Program