About this application: This application provides summary profiles showing frequently requested data items from various US Census Bureau programs. Profiles are available for the nation, states, and counties.
Median household income (in 2018 dollars), 2014-2018 - (US Dollars)
County
Value
Alcona
39,735
Alger
46,007
Allegan
59,883
Alpena
41,991
Antrim
52,589
Arenac
40,769
Baraga
42,444
Barry
61,016
Bay
48,005
Benzie
56,639
Berrien
49,135
Branch
50,536
Calhoun
47,426
Cass
53,571
Charlevoix
53,207
Cheboygan
46,161
Chippewa
44,483
Clare
37,369
Clinton
67,482
Crawford
47,443
Delta
46,490
Dickinson
48,966
Eaton
62,474
Emmet
54,055
Genesee
47,006
Gladwin
43,290
Gogebic
38,798
Grand Traverse
61,485
Gratiot
44,991
Hillsdale
48,392
Houghton
42,852
Huron
46,320
Ingham
50,940
Ionia
54,343
Iosco
42,102
Iron
38,918
Isabella
44,408
Jackson
51,431
Kalamazoo
54,431
Kalkaska
46,004
Kent
60,351
Keweenaw
49,779
Lake
34,631
Lapeer
58,952
Leelanau
63,831
Lenawee
53,972
Livingston
80,897
Luce
42,255
Mackinac
46,507
Macomb
60,466
Manistee
47,172
Marquette
50,771
Mason
49,663
Mecosta
44,460
Menominee
45,508
Midland
59,271
Missaukee
44,766
Monroe
61,514
Montcalm
47,000
Montmorency
42,305
Muskegon
48,329
Newaygo
46,724
Oakland
76,387
Oceana
46,217
Ogemaw
40,150
Ontonagon
38,906
Osceola
42,689
Oscoda
40,255
Otsego
52,645
Ottawa
67,468
Presque Isle
46,439
Roscommon
40,302
Saginaw
46,919
Sanilac
45,277
Schoolcraft
40,747
Shiawassee
54,742
St. Clair
55,240
St. Joseph
50,117
Tuscola
47,694
Van Buren
52,351
Washtenaw
69,434
Wayne
45,321
Wexford
44,166
Value for Michigan (US Dollars): $54,938
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS) and Puerto Rico Community Survey (PRCS), 5-Year Estimates. The PRCS is part of the Census Bureau's ACS, customized for Puerto Rico. Both Surveys are updated every year.
Definition
Income in the Past 12 Months - Income of Households: This includes the income of the householder and all other individuals 15 years old and over in the household, whether they are related to the householder or not. Because many households consist of only one person, average household income is usually less than average family income. Although the household income statistics cover the past 12 months, the characteristics of individuals and the composition of households refer to the time of interview. Thus, the income of the household does not include amounts received by individuals who were members of the household during all or part of the past 12 months if these individuals no longer resided in the household at the time of interview. Similarly, income amounts reported by individuals who did not reside in the household during the past 12 months but who were members of the household at the time of interview are included. However, the composition of most households was the same during the past 12 months as at the time of interview.
The median divides the income distribution into two equal parts: one-half of the cases falling below the median income and one-half above the median. For households and families, the median income is based on the distribution of the total number of households and families including those with no income. The median income for individuals is based on individuals 15 years old and over with income. Median income for households, families, and individuals is computed on the basis of a standard distribution. For the complete definition, go to ACS subject definitions "Income in the Past 12 Months."
Source and Accuracy
This Fact is based on data collected in the American Community Survey (ACS) and the Puerto Rico Community Survey (PRCS) conducted annually by the U.S. Census Bureau. A sample of over 3.5 million housing unit addresses is interviewed each year over a 12 month period. This Fact (estimate) is based on five years of ACS and PRCS sample data and describes the average value of person, household and housing unit characteristics over this period of collection.
Statistics from all surveys are subject to sampling and nonsampling error. Sampling error is the uncertainty between an estimate based on a sample and the corresponding value that would be obtained if the estimate were based on the entire population (as from a census). Measures of sampling error are provided in the form of margins of error for all estimates included with ACS and PRCS published products. The Census Bureau recommends that data users incorporate this information into their analyses, as sampling error in survey estimates could impact the conclusions drawn from the results. The data for each geographic area are presented together with margins of error at Using margins of error. A more detailed explanation of margins of error and a demonstration of how to use them is provided below.
For more information on sampling and estimation methodology, confidentiality, and sampling and nonsampling errors, please see the Multiyear Accuracy (US) and the Multiyear Accuracy (Puerto Rico) documents at "Documentation - Accuracy of the data."
Margin of Error
As mentioned above, ACS estimates are based on a sample and are subject to sampling error. The margin of error measures the degree of uncertainty caused by sampling error. The margin of error is used with an ACS estimate to construct a confidence interval about the estimate. The interval is formed by adding the margin of error to the estimate (the upper bound) and subtracting the margin of error from the estimate (the lower bound). It is expected with 90 percent confidence that the interval will contain the full population value of the estimate. The following example is for demonstrating purposes only. Suppose the ACS reported that the percentage of people in a state who were 25 years and older with a bachelor's degree was 21.3 percent and that the margin of error associated with this estimate was 0.7 percent. By adding and subtracting the margin of error from the estimate, we calculate the 90-percent confidence interval for this estimate:
Therefore, we can be 90 percent confident that the percent of the population 25 years and older having a bachelor's degree in a state falls somewhere between 20.6 percent and 22.0 percent.