Mexico - Rural population

The value for Rural population in Mexico was 24,844,050 as of 2020. As the graph below shows, over the past 60 years this indicator reached a maximum value of 25,325,350 in 2012 and a minimum value of 18,601,510 in 1960.

Definition: Rural population refers to people living in rural areas as defined by national statistical offices. It is calculated as the difference between total population and urban population. Aggregation of urban and rural population may not add up to total population because of different country coverages.

Source: World Bank staff estimates based on the United Nations Population Division's World Urbanization Prospects: 2018 Revision.

See also:

Year Value
1960 18,601,510
1961 18,863,460
1962 19,121,720
1963 19,377,440
1964 19,631,920
1965 19,886,180
1966 20,137,480
1967 20,385,100
1968 20,626,690
1969 20,862,640
1970 21,101,550
1971 21,347,840
1972 21,585,030
1973 21,809,340
1974 22,014,640
1975 22,198,600
1976 22,358,910
1977 22,498,000
1978 22,615,770
1979 22,716,210
1980 22,809,150
1981 22,994,740
1982 23,167,960
1983 23,325,870
1984 23,467,920
1985 23,592,870
1986 23,699,540
1987 23,789,330
1988 23,863,370
1989 23,923,230
1990 23,991,790
1991 24,100,880
1992 24,199,050
1993 24,285,140
1994 24,355,750
1995 24,411,770
1996 24,525,620
1997 24,666,040
1998 24,795,980
1999 24,916,150
2000 24,999,900
2001 25,029,400
2002 25,050,040
2003 25,067,240
2004 25,086,720
2005 25,114,750
2006 25,151,870
2007 25,196,550
2008 25,241,500
2009 25,281,880
2010 25,311,520
2011 25,324,580
2012 25,325,350
2013 25,311,370
2014 25,283,000
2015 25,242,940
2016 25,188,380
2017 25,121,420
2018 25,041,300
2019 24,948,670
2020 24,844,050

Development Relevance: The rural population is calculated using the urban share reported by the United Nations Population Division. There is no universal standard for distinguishing rural from urban areas, and any urban-rural dichotomy is an oversimplification. The two distinct images - isolated farm, thriving metropolis - represent poles on a continuum. Life changes along a variety of dimensions, moving from the most remote forest outpost through fields and pastures, past tiny hamlets, through small towns with weekly farm markets, into intensively cultivated areas near large towns and small cities, eventually reaching the center of a megacity. Along the way access to infrastructure, social services, and nonfarm employment increase, and with them population density and income. A 2005 World Bank Policy Research Paper proposes an operational definition of rurality based on population density and distance to large cities (Chomitz, Buys, and Thomas 2005). The report argues that these criteria are important gradients along which economic behavior and appropriate development interventions vary substantially. Where population densities are low, markets of all kinds are thin, and the unit cost of delivering most social services and many types of infrastructure is high. Where large urban areas are distant, farm-gate or factory-gate prices of outputs will be low and input prices will be high, and it will be difficult to recruit skilled people to public service or private enterprises. Thus, low population density and remoteness together define a set of rural areas that face special development challenges. Countries differ in the way they classify population as "urban" or "rural." Most countries use an urban classification related to the size or characteristics of settlements. Some define urban areas based on the presence of certain infrastructure and services. And other countries designate urban areas based on administrative arrangements. Because of national differences in the characteristics that distinguish urban from rural areas, the distinction between urban and rural population is not amenable to a single definition that would be applicable to all countries. Rural population methodology is defined by various national statistical offices. In the United States, for example, the US Census Bureau's urban-rural classification is fundamentally a delineation of geographical areas, identifying both individual urban areas and the rural areas of the nation. "Rural" encompasses all population, housing, and territory not included within an urban area.

Limitations and Exceptions: Aggregation of urban and rural population may not add up to total population because of different country coverage. There is no consistent and universally accepted standard for distinguishing urban from rural areas, in part because of the wide variety of situations across countries. Estimates of the world's urban population would change significantly if China, India, and a few other populous nations were to change their definition of urban centers. Because the estimates of city and metropolitan area are based on national definitions of what constitutes a city or metropolitan area, cross-country comparisons should be made with caution. To estimate urban populations, UN ratios of urban to total population were applied to the World Bank's estimates of total population.

Statistical Concept and Methodology: Rural population is calculated as the difference between the total population and the urban population. Rural population is approximated as the midyear nonurban population. While a practical means of identifying the rural population, it is not a precise measure. The United Nations Population Division and other agencies provide current population estimates for developing countries that lack recent census data and pre- and post-census estimates for countries with census data.

Aggregation method: Sum

Periodicity: Annual

Classification

Topic: Environment Indicators

Sub-Topic: Density & urbanization