Coverage of social safety net programs in 4th quintile (% of population) - Country Ranking - Africa

Definition: Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.

Source: ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, The World Bank. Data are based on national representative household surveys. (datatopics.worldbank.org/aspire/)

See also: Thematic map, Time series comparison

Find indicator:
Rank Country Value Year
1 Eswatini 77.46 2016
2 South Africa 72.40 2014
3 Lesotho 62.71 2017
4 Burkina Faso 57.18 2018
5 Mauritius 50.70 2017
6 Mauritania 46.67 2014
7 Egypt 46.53 2008
8 Gabon 45.01 2017
9 Botswana 43.04 2015
10 Malawi 39.33 2016
11 Namibia 35.54 2015
12 Morocco 32.54 2009
13 Kenya 24.49 2015
14 Côte d'Ivoire 22.67 2015
15 Rwanda 21.39 2013
16 Niger 20.46 2014
17 Zimbabwe 18.89 2019
18 Cabo Verde 17.76 2007
19 Angola 17.26 2018
20 Sierra Leone 14.76 2018
21 Ethiopia 13.38 2018
22 Tunisia 11.67 2010
23 Dem. Rep. Congo 11.29 2012
24 Nigeria 10.31 2018
25 Tanzania 9.91 2014
26 Liberia 9.89 2016
27 Ghana 9.40 2016
28 Senegal 8.33 2011
29 Sudan 4.94 2009
30 Djibouti 2.05 2012
31 Zambia 1.91 2015
32 Guinea 1.80 2012
33 Mozambique 1.57 2014
34 Cameroon 1.10 2014
35 The Gambia 0.74 2015
36 Congo 0.50 2005
37 Uganda 0.47 2016
38 Chad 0.37 2011

More rankings: Africa | Asia | Central America & the Caribbean | Europe | Middle East | North America | Oceania | South America | World |

Limitations and Exceptions: When interpreting ASPIRE performance indicators based on household surveys, it is important to note that the extent to which information on specific transfers and programs is captured in the household surveys can vary a lot across countries. Moreover, household surveys do not capture the universe of social protection programs in the country, in best practice cases just the largest programs. As a consequence, ASPIRE indicators are not fully comparable across program categories and countries; however, they provide approximate measures of social protection systems performance. In addition, there may be cases where ASPIRE performance indicators differ from official WB country reports as ASPIRE indicators are based on a first level analysis of original survey data and unified methodology that does not necessarily reflect country-specific knowledge and in depth country analysis relying on administrative program level data and/or imputations.

Aggregation method: Simple average

Periodicity: Annual