Coverage of social safety net programs in 3rd quintile (% of population) - Country Ranking - Africa

Definition: Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.

Source: ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, The World Bank. Data are based on national representative household surveys. (datatopics.worldbank.org/aspire/)

See also: Thematic map, Time series comparison

Find indicator:
Rank Country Value Year
1 Eswatini 89.09 2016
2 South Africa 86.80 2014
3 Lesotho 75.44 2017
4 Burkina Faso 61.75 2018
5 Botswana 59.22 2015
6 Mauritius 50.52 2017
7 Gabon 50.17 2017
8 Mauritania 48.67 2014
9 Egypt 45.47 2008
10 Malawi 44.65 2016
11 Namibia 43.99 2015
12 Morocco 39.17 2009
13 Côte d'Ivoire 31.48 2015
14 Niger 27.95 2014
15 Zimbabwe 26.63 2019
16 Kenya 25.84 2015
17 Ethiopia 23.15 2018
18 Rwanda 21.81 2013
19 Cabo Verde 20.85 2007
20 Sierra Leone 18.31 2018
21 Angola 17.99 2018
22 Nigeria 17.92 2018
23 Tunisia 15.10 2010
24 Ghana 14.11 2016
25 Tanzania 12.80 2014
26 Liberia 11.65 2016
27 Dem. Rep. Congo 9.26 2012
28 Senegal 8.05 2011
29 Sudan 6.63 2009
30 Djibouti 3.83 2012
31 The Gambia 2.21 2015
32 Mozambique 1.97 2014
33 Chad 1.46 2011
34 Zambia 1.36 2015
35 Guinea 1.35 2012
36 Congo 0.88 2005
37 Cameroon 0.58 2014
38 Uganda 0.51 2016

More rankings: Africa | Asia | Central America & the Caribbean | Europe | Middle East | North America | Oceania | South America | World |

Limitations and Exceptions: When interpreting ASPIRE performance indicators based on household surveys, it is important to note that the extent to which information on specific transfers and programs is captured in the household surveys can vary a lot across countries. Moreover, household surveys do not capture the universe of social protection programs in the country, in best practice cases just the largest programs. As a consequence, ASPIRE indicators are not fully comparable across program categories and countries; however, they provide approximate measures of social protection systems performance. In addition, there may be cases where ASPIRE performance indicators differ from official WB country reports as ASPIRE indicators are based on a first level analysis of original survey data and unified methodology that does not necessarily reflect country-specific knowledge and in depth country analysis relying on administrative program level data and/or imputations.

Aggregation method: Simple average

Periodicity: Annual