Time required to enforce a contract (days) - Country Ranking - Africa

Definition: Time required to enforce a contract is the number of calendar days from the filing of the lawsuit in court until the final determination and, in appropriate cases, payment.

Source: World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/).

See also: Thematic map, Time series comparison

Find indicator:
Rank Country Value Year
1 Guinea-Bissau 1,785.00 2019
2 Liberia 1,300.00 2019
3 Angola 1,296.00 2019
4 São Tomé and Principe 1,185.00 2019
5 Gabon 1,160.00 2019
6 Egypt 1,010.00 2019
7 Eswatini 956.00 2019
8 Mozambique 950.00 2019
9 Seychelles 915.00 2019
10 Burundi 832.00 2019
11 Madagascar 811.00 2019
12 Sudan 810.00 2019
13 Cameroon 800.00 2019
14 The Gambia 758.00 2019
15 Chad 743.00 2019
16 Ghana 710.00 2019
17 Djibouti 695.00 2019
18 Libya 690.00 2019
19 Botswana 660.00 2019
19 Central African Republic 660.00 2019
21 Senegal 650.00 2019
22 Algeria 630.00 2019
23 Mali 620.00 2019
24 Lesotho 615.00 2019
25 Zambia 611.00 2019
26 Dem. Rep. Congo 610.00 2019
27 South Africa 600.00 2019
28 Benin 595.00 2019
29 Somalia 575.00 2019
30 Tunisia 565.00 2019
31 Congo 560.00 2019
32 Ethiopia 530.00 2019
33 Côte d'Ivoire 525.00 2019
34 Malawi 522.00 2019
35 Tanzania 515.00 2019
35 Sierra Leone 515.00 2019
37 Morocco 510.00 2019
38 Comoros 506.00 2019
39 Eritrea 490.00 2019
39 Mauritius 490.00 2019
39 Uganda 490.00 2019
42 Togo 488.00 2019
43 Equatorial Guinea 475.00 2019
44 Kenya 465.00 2019
45 Namibia 460.00 2019
46 Burkina Faso 446.00 2019
47 Cabo Verde 425.00 2019
48 Zimbabwe 410.00 2019
49 Nigeria 399.00 2019
50 Niger 380.00 2019
51 Mauritania 370.00 2019
52 Guinea 311.00 2019
53 Rwanda 230.00 2019

More rankings: Africa | Asia | Central America & the Caribbean | Europe | Middle East | North America | Oceania | South America | World |

Development Relevance: The economic health of a country is measured not only in macroeconomic terms but also by other factors that shape daily economic activity such as laws, regulations, and institutional arrangements. The data measure business regulation, gauge regulatory outcomes, and measure the extent of legal protection of property, the flexibility of employment regulation, and the tax burden on businesses. The fundamental premise of this data is that economic activity requires good rules and regulations that are efficient, accessible to all who need to use them, and simple to implement. Thus sometimes there is more emphasis on more regulation, such as stricter disclosure requirements in related-party transactions, and other times emphasis is on for simplified regulations, such as a one-stop shop for completing business startup formalities. Entrepreneurs may not be aware of all required procedures or may avoid legally required procedures altogether. But where regulation is particularly onerous, levels of informality are higher, which comes at a cost: firms in the informal sector usually grow more slowly, have less access to credit, and employ fewer workers - and those workers remain outside the protections of labor law. The indicator can help policymakers understand the business environment in a country and - along with information from other sources such as the World Bank's Enterprise Surveys - provide insights into potential areas of reform.

Limitations and Exceptions: The Doing Business methodology has limitations that should be considered when interpreting the data. First, the data collected refer to businesses in the economy's largest city and may not represent regulations in other locations of the economy. To address this limitation, subnational indicators are being collected for selected economies. These subnational studies point to significant differences in the speed of reform and the ease of doing business across cities in the same economy. Second, the data often focus on a specific business form - generally a limited liability company of a specified size - and may not represent regulation for other types of businesses such as sole proprietorships. Third, transactions described in a standardized business case refer to a specific set of issues and may not represent the full set of issues a business encounters. Fourth, the time measures involve an element of judgment by the expert respondents. When sources indicate different estimates, the Doing Business time indicators represent the median values of several responses given under the assumptions of the standardized case. Fifth, the methodology assumes that a business has full information on what is required and does not waste time when completing procedures.

Statistical Concept and Methodology: Data are collected by the World Bank with a standardized survey that uses a simple business case to ensure comparability across economies and over time - with assumptions about the legal form of the business, its size, its location, and nature of its operation. Surveys are administered through more than 9,000 local experts, including lawyers, business consultants, accountants, freight forwarders, government officials, and other professionals who routinely administer or advise on legal and regulatory requirements. A judicial system that provides effective commercial dispute resolution is crucial to a healthy economy. Without one, firms risk finding themselves operating in an environment where compliance with contractual obligations is not the norm. The Doing Business project of the World Bank encompasses two types of data: data from readings of laws and regulations and data on time and motion indicators that measure efficiency in achieving a regulatory goal. Within the time and motion indicators cost estimates are recorded from official fee schedules where applicable. The data from surveys are subjected to numerous tests for robustness, which lead to revision or expansion of the information collected.

Aggregation method: Unweighted average

Periodicity: Annual

General Comments: Data are presented for the survey year instead of publication year.