Zimbabwe - Country Policy and Institutional Assessment
CPIA business regulatory environment rating (1=low to 6=high)
The value for CPIA business regulatory environment rating (1=low to 6=high) in Zimbabwe was 2.00 as of 2011. As the graph below shows, over the past 6 years this indicator reached a maximum value of 2.00 in 2011 and a minimum value of 1.50 in 2007.
Definition:
Source: World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).
See also:
| Year | Value |
|---|---|
| 2005 | 2.00 |
| 2006 | 2.00 |
| 2007 | 1.50 |
| 2008 | 1.50 |
| 2009 | 2.00 |
| 2010 | 2.00 |
| 2011 | 2.00 |
CPIA debt policy rating (1=low to 6=high)
The value for CPIA debt policy rating (1=low to 6=high) in Zimbabwe was 1.50 as of 2011. As the graph below shows, over the past 6 years this indicator reached a maximum value of 1.50 in 2011 and a minimum value of 1.00 in 2005.
Definition:
Source: World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).
See also:
| Year | Value |
|---|---|
| 2005 | 1.00 |
| 2006 | 1.00 |
| 2007 | 1.00 |
| 2008 | 1.00 |
| 2009 | 1.00 |
| 2010 | 1.00 |
| 2011 | 1.50 |
CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
The value for CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high) in Zimbabwe was 1.83 as of 2011. As the graph below shows, over the past 6 years this indicator reached a maximum value of 1.83 in 2011 and a minimum value of 1.00 in 2005.
Definition:
Source: World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).
See also:
| Year | Value |
|---|---|
| 2005 | 1.00 |
| 2006 | 1.00 |
| 2007 | 1.00 |
| 2008 | 1.00 |
| 2009 | 1.67 |
| 2010 | 1.67 |
| 2011 | 1.83 |
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high)
The value for CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high) in Zimbabwe was 3.00 as of 2011. As the graph below shows, over the past 6 years this indicator reached a maximum value of 3.00 in 2011 and a minimum value of 2.00 in 2008.
Definition:
Source: World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).
See also:
| Year | Value |
|---|---|
| 2005 | 2.50 |
| 2006 | 2.50 |
| 2007 | 2.50 |
| 2008 | 2.00 |
| 2009 | 2.00 |
| 2010 | 2.00 |
| 2011 | 3.00 |
CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating (1=low to 6=high)
The value for CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating (1=low to 6=high) in Zimbabwe was 2.50 as of 2011. As the graph below shows, over the past 6 years this indicator reached a maximum value of 2.50 in 2011 and a minimum value of 1.50 in 2008.
Definition:
Source: World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).
See also:
| Year | Value |
|---|---|
| 2005 | 2.50 |
| 2006 | 2.00 |
| 2007 | 2.00 |
| 2008 | 1.50 |
| 2009 | 2.00 |
| 2010 | 2.00 |
| 2011 | 2.50 |
CPIA financial sector rating (1=low to 6=high)
The value for CPIA financial sector rating (1=low to 6=high) in Zimbabwe was 2.00 as of 2011. As the graph below shows, over the past 6 years this indicator reached a maximum value of 2.50 in 2007 and a minimum value of 1.00 in 2008.
Definition:
Source: World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).
See also:
| Year | Value |
|---|---|
| 2005 | 2.50 |
| 2006 | 2.50 |
| 2007 | 2.50 |
| 2008 | 1.00 |
| 2009 | 1.50 |
| 2010 | 2.00 |
| 2011 | 2.00 |
CPIA fiscal policy rating (1=low to 6=high)
The value for CPIA fiscal policy rating (1=low to 6=high) in Zimbabwe was 2.00 as of 2011. As the graph below shows, over the past 6 years this indicator reached a maximum value of 2.00 in 2011 and a minimum value of 1.00 in 2005.
Definition:
Source: World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).
See also:
| Year | Value |
|---|---|
| 2005 | 1.00 |
| 2006 | 1.00 |
| 2007 | 1.00 |
| 2008 | 1.00 |
| 2009 | 2.00 |
| 2010 | 2.00 |
| 2011 | 2.00 |
CPIA gender equality rating (1=low to 6=high)
The value for CPIA gender equality rating (1=low to 6=high) in Zimbabwe was 3.00 as of 2011. As the graph below shows, over the past 6 years this indicator reached a maximum value of 3.00 in 2011 and a minimum value of 2.50 in 2005.
Definition:
Source: World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).
See also:
| Year | Value |
|---|---|
| 2005 | 2.50 |
| 2006 | 2.50 |
| 2007 | 2.50 |
| 2008 | 2.50 |
| 2009 | 2.50 |
| 2010 | 2.50 |
| 2011 | 3.00 |
CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high)
The value for CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high) in Zimbabwe was 2.00 as of 2011. As the graph below shows, over the past 6 years this indicator reached a maximum value of 2.00 in 2011 and a minimum value of 1.00 in 2008.
Definition:
Source: World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).
See also:
| Year | Value |
|---|---|
| 2005 | 2.00 |
| 2006 | 2.00 |
| 2007 | 1.50 |
| 2008 | 1.00 |
| 2009 | 1.00 |
| 2010 | 1.50 |
| 2011 | 2.00 |
IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high)
The value for IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high) in Zimbabwe was 2.19 as of 2011. As the graph below shows, over the past 6 years this indicator reached a maximum value of 2.19 in 2011 and a minimum value of 1.40 in 2008.
Definition:
Source: World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).
See also:
| Year | Value |
|---|---|
| 2005 | 1.82 |
| 2006 | 1.77 |
| 2007 | 1.65 |
| 2008 | 1.40 |
| 2009 | 1.86 |
| 2010 | 1.98 |
| 2011 | 2.19 |
CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high)
The value for CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high) in Zimbabwe was 2.00 as of 2011. As the graph below shows, over the past 6 years this indicator reached a maximum value of 2.00 in 2011 and a minimum value of 1.00 in 2005.
Definition:
Source: World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).
See also:
| Year | Value |
|---|---|
| 2005 | 1.00 |
| 2006 | 1.00 |
| 2007 | 1.00 |
| 2008 | 1.00 |
| 2009 | 2.00 |
| 2010 | 2.00 |
| 2011 | 2.00 |
CPIA quality of public administration rating (1=low to 6=high)
The value for CPIA quality of public administration rating (1=low to 6=high) in Zimbabwe was 2.00 as of 2011. As the graph below shows, over the past 6 years this indicator reached a maximum value of 2.00 in 2011 and a minimum value of 1.00 in 2008.
Definition:
Source: World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).
See also:
| Year | Value |
|---|---|
| 2005 | 2.00 |
| 2006 | 2.00 |
| 2007 | 1.50 |
| 2008 | 1.00 |
| 2009 | 1.50 |
| 2010 | 2.00 |
| 2011 | 2.00 |
CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high)
The value for CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high) in Zimbabwe was 2.00 as of 2011. As the graph below shows, over the past 6 years this indicator reached a maximum value of 2.00 in 2011 and a minimum value of 1.00 in 2008.
Definition:
Source: World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).
See also:
| Year | Value |
|---|---|
| 2005 | 1.50 |
| 2006 | 1.50 |
| 2007 | 1.50 |
| 2008 | 1.00 |
| 2009 | 1.50 |
| 2010 | 2.00 |
| 2011 | 2.00 |
CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating (1=low to 6=high)
The value for CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating (1=low to 6=high) in Zimbabwe was 1.50 as of 2011. As the graph below shows, over the past 6 years this indicator reached a maximum value of 1.50 in 2011 and a minimum value of 1.00 in 2005.
Definition:
Source: World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).
See also:
| Year | Value |
|---|---|
| 2005 | 1.00 |
| 2006 | 1.00 |
| 2007 | 1.00 |
| 2008 | 1.00 |
| 2009 | 1.50 |
| 2010 | 1.50 |
| 2011 | 1.50 |
CPIA social protection rating (1=low to 6=high)
The value for CPIA social protection rating (1=low to 6=high) in Zimbabwe was 2.00 as of 2011. As the graph below shows, over the past 6 years this indicator reached a maximum value of 2.00 in 2011 and a minimum value of 1.00 in 2007.
Definition:
Source: World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).
See also:
| Year | Value |
|---|---|
| 2005 | 1.50 |
| 2007 | 1.00 |
| 2008 | 1.00 |
| 2009 | 1.00 |
| 2010 | 1.00 |
| 2011 | 2.00 |
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
The value for CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high) in Zimbabwe was 2.20 as of 2011. As the graph below shows, over the past 6 years this indicator reached a maximum value of 2.20 in 2011 and a minimum value of 1.60 in 2008.
Definition:
Source: World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).
See also:
| Year | Value |
|---|---|
| 2005 | 2.10 |
| 2006 | 1.90 |
| 2007 | 1.80 |
| 2008 | 1.60 |
| 2009 | 2.00 |
| 2010 | 2.10 |
| 2011 | 2.20 |
CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high)
The value for CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high) in Zimbabwe was 3.50 as of 2011. As the graph below shows, over the past 6 years this indicator reached a maximum value of 3.50 in 2011 and a minimum value of 3.50 in 2005.
Definition:
Source: World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).
See also:
| Year | Value |
|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.50 |
| 2006 | 3.50 |
| 2007 | 3.50 |
| 2008 | 3.50 |
| 2009 | 3.50 |
| 2010 | 3.50 |
| 2011 | 3.50 |
CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
The value for CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average (1=low to 6=high) in Zimbabwe was 2.40 as of 2011. As the graph below shows, over the past 6 years this indicator reached a maximum value of 2.40 in 2011 and a minimum value of 1.50 in 2008.
Definition:
Source: World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).
See also:
| Year | Value |
|---|---|
| 2005 | 2.00 |
| 2006 | 2.00 |
| 2007 | 1.80 |
| 2008 | 1.50 |
| 2009 | 1.60 |
| 2010 | 1.80 |
| 2011 | 2.40 |
CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
The value for CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high) in Zimbabwe was 2.33 as of 2011. As the graph below shows, over the past 6 years this indicator reached a maximum value of 2.33 in 2011 and a minimum value of 1.50 in 2008.
Definition:
Source: World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).
See also:
| Year | Value |
|---|---|
| 2005 | 2.17 |
| 2006 | 2.20 |
| 2007 | 2.00 |
| 2008 | 1.50 |
| 2009 | 2.17 |
| 2010 | 2.33 |
| 2011 | 2.33 |
CPIA trade rating (1=low to 6=high)
The value for CPIA trade rating (1=low to 6=high) in Zimbabwe was 3.00 as of 2011. As the graph below shows, over the past 6 years this indicator reached a maximum value of 3.00 in 2011 and a minimum value of 2.00 in 2005.
Definition:
Source: World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).
See also:
| Year | Value |
|---|---|
| 2005 | 2.00 |
| 2006 | 2.00 |
| 2007 | 2.00 |
| 2008 | 2.00 |
| 2009 | 3.00 |
| 2010 | 3.00 |
| 2011 | 3.00 |
CPIA transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector rating (1=low to 6=high)
The value for CPIA transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector rating (1=low to 6=high) in Zimbabwe was 1.50 as of 2011. As the graph below shows, over the past 6 years this indicator reached a maximum value of 1.50 in 2011 and a minimum value of 1.00 in 2006.
Definition:
Source: World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).
See also:
| Year | Value |
|---|---|
| 2005 | 1.50 |
| 2006 | 1.00 |
| 2007 | 1.00 |
| 2008 | 1.00 |
| 2009 | 1.50 |
| 2010 | 1.50 |
| 2011 | 1.50 |
Classification
Topic: Public Sector Indicators
Sub-Topic: Policy & institutions
