Latvia - Rural population growth (annual %)

The value for Rural population growth (annual %) in Latvia was -0.994 as of 2020. As the graph below shows, over the past 59 years this indicator reached a maximum value of 0.491 in 1987 and a minimum value of -2.165 in 2010.

Definition: Rural population refers to people living in rural areas as defined by national statistical offices. It is calculated as the difference between total population and urban population.

Source: World Bank staff estimates based on the United Nations Population Division's World Urbanization Prospects: 2018 Revision.

See also:

Year Value
1961 -0.220
1962 -0.399
1963 -0.423
1964 -0.451
1965 -0.684
1966 -1.075
1967 -1.074
1968 -0.917
1969 -1.068
1970 -1.253
1971 -1.122
1972 -0.994
1973 -0.982
1974 -0.962
1975 -1.086
1976 -1.281
1977 -1.329
1978 -1.403
1979 -1.296
1980 -1.006
1981 -0.747
1982 -0.408
1983 -0.286
1984 -0.251
1985 -0.222
1986 0.103
1987 0.491
1988 0.484
1989 0.223
1990 -0.305
1991 -0.314
1992 -0.250
1993 -1.802
1994 -2.001
1995 -0.941
1996 -0.807
1997 -0.837
1998 -0.469
1999 -0.084
2000 -0.484
2001 -0.926
2002 -0.850
2003 -0.811
2004 -1.402
2005 -1.393
2006 -0.814
2007 -0.607
2008 -0.846
2009 -1.589
2010 -2.165
2011 -1.908
2012 -1.328
2013 -1.158
2014 -1.026
2015 -0.906
2016 -1.042
2017 -1.055
2018 -0.989
2019 -0.947
2020 -0.994

Development Relevance: The rural population is calculated using the urban share reported by the United Nations Population Division. There is no universal standard for distinguishing rural from urban areas, and any urban-rural dichotomy is an oversimplification. The two distinct images - isolated farm, thriving metropolis - represent poles on a continuum. Life changes along a variety of dimensions, moving from the most remote forest outpost through fields and pastures, past tiny hamlets, through small towns with weekly farm markets, into intensively cultivated areas near large towns and small cities, eventually reaching the center of a megacity. Along the way access to infrastructure, social services, and nonfarm employment increase, and with them population density and income. A 2005 World Bank Policy Research Paper proposes an operational definition of rurality based on population density and distance to large cities (Chomitz, Buys, and Thomas 2005). The report argues that these criteria are important gradients along which economic behavior and appropriate development interventions vary substantially. Where population densities are low, markets of all kinds are thin, and the unit cost of delivering most social services and many types of infrastructure is high. Where large urban areas are distant, farm-gate or factory-gate prices of outputs will be low and input prices will be high, and it will be difficult to recruit skilled people to public service or private enterprises. Thus, low population density and remoteness together define a set of rural areas that face special development challenges. Countries differ in the way they classify population as "urban" or "rural." Most countries use an urban classification related to the size or characteristics of settlements. Some define urban areas based on the presence of certain infrastructure and services. And other countries designate urban areas based on administrative arrangements. Because of national differences in the characteristics that distinguish urban from rural areas, the distinction between urban and rural population is not amenable to a single definition that would be applicable to all countries. Rural population methodology is defined by various national statistical offices. In the United States, for example, the US Census Bureau's urban-rural classification is fundamentally a delineation of geographical areas, identifying both individual urban areas and the rural areas of the nation. "Rural" encompasses all population, housing, and territory not included within an urban area.

Limitations and Exceptions: Aggregation of urban and rural population may not add up to total population because of different country coverage. There is no consistent and universally accepted standard for distinguishing urban from rural areas, in part because of the wide variety of situations across countries. Estimates of the world's urban population would change significantly if China, India, and a few other populous nations were to change their definition of urban centers. Because the estimates of city and metropolitan area are based on national definitions of what constitutes a city or metropolitan area, cross-country comparisons should be made with caution. To estimate urban populations, UN ratios of urban to total population were applied to the World Bank's estimates of total population.

Statistical Concept and Methodology: Rural population is calculated as the difference between the total population and the urban population. Rural population is approximated as the midyear nonurban population. While a practical means of identifying the rural population, it is not a precise measure. The United Nations Population Division and other agencies provide current population estimates for developing countries that lack recent census data and pre- and post-census estimates for countries with census data.

Aggregation method: Weighted average

Periodicity: Annual

Classification

Topic: Environment Indicators

Sub-Topic: Density & urbanization