Benefit incidence of social insurance programs to poorest quintile (% of total social insurance benefits) - Country Ranking - Asia

Definition: Benefit incidence of social insurance programs to poorest quintile shows the percentage of total social insurance benefits received by the poorest 20% of the population. Social insurance programs include old age contributory pensions (including survivors and disability) and social security and health insurance benefits (including occupational injury benefits, paid sick leave, maternity and other social insurance). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.

Source: ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, The World Bank. Data are based on national representative household surveys. (datatopics.worldbank.org/aspire/)

See also: Thematic map, Time series comparison

Find indicator:
Rank Country Value Year
1 India 21.24 2011
2 Tajikistan 17.76 2011
3 Azerbaijan 15.92 2015
4 Armenia 15.08 2018
5 Kyrgyz Republic 14.86 2013
6 Uzbekistan 12.08 2018
7 Jordan 9.96 2010
8 Mongolia 9.95 2016
9 Russia 8.42 2017
10 Kazakhstan 8.21 2017
11 Yemen 8.08 2005
12 Iraq 8.02 2012
13 Myanmar 5.15 2017
14 Timor-Leste 4.87 2011
15 Turkey 4.46 2019
16 Malaysia 3.67 2016
17 Afghanistan 3.66 2007
18 Sri Lanka 2.32 2016
19 China 2.16 2013
20 Bangladesh 2.10 2016
21 Lao PDR 2.05 2018
22 Pakistan 2.04 2018
23 Vietnam 1.62 2014
24 Syrian Arab Republic 1.51 2003
25 Bhutan 1.31 2012
26 Philippines 1.06 2015
27 Thailand 0.53 2017
28 Nepal 0.46 2010
29 Cambodia 0.10 2013

More rankings: Africa | Asia | Central America & the Caribbean | Europe | Middle East | North America | Oceania | South America | World |

Limitations and Exceptions: When interpreting ASPIRE performance indicators based on household surveys, it is important to note that the extent to which information on specific transfers and programs is captured in the household surveys can vary a lot across countries. Moreover, household surveys do not capture the universe of social protection programs in the country, in best practice cases just the largest programs. As a consequence, ASPIRE indicators are not fully comparable across program categories and countries; however, they provide approximate measures of social protection systems performance. In addition, there may be cases where ASPIRE performance indicators differ from official WB country reports as ASPIRE indicators are based on a first level analysis of original survey data and unified methodology that does not necessarily reflect country-specific knowledge and in depth country analysis relying on administrative program level data and/or imputations.

Aggregation method: Simple average

Periodicity: Annual