Coverage of social safety net programs in richest quintile (% of population) - Country Ranking - Africa

Definition: Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.

Source: ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, The World Bank. Data are based on national representative household surveys. (datatopics.worldbank.org/aspire/)

See also: Thematic map, Time series comparison

Find indicator:
Rank Country Value Year
1 Mauritius 51.51 2017
2 South Africa 44.93 2014
3 Eswatini 44.84 2016
4 Burkina Faso 43.03 2018
5 Gabon 42.68 2017
6 Lesotho 39.04 2017
7 Mauritania 37.28 2014
8 Egypt 30.18 2008
9 Botswana 26.62 2015
10 Malawi 25.54 2016
11 Namibia 25.27 2015
12 Cabo Verde 22.49 2007
13 Kenya 19.46 2015
14 Morocco 18.16 2009
15 Dem. Rep. Congo 17.75 2012
16 Niger 16.03 2014
17 Rwanda 14.95 2013
18 Angola 14.62 2018
19 Zimbabwe 14.57 2019
20 Ethiopia 12.71 2018
21 Côte d'Ivoire 11.40 2015
22 Senegal 11.17 2011
23 Tunisia 10.28 2010
24 Tanzania 10.28 2014
25 Liberia 7.80 2016
26 Sierra Leone 7.69 2018
27 Nigeria 4.82 2018
28 Ghana 4.15 2016
29 Zambia 2.40 2015
30 Guinea 2.39 2012
31 Cameroon 2.35 2014
32 Sudan 2.33 2009
33 Djibouti 1.57 2012
34 Uganda 1.13 2016
35 Congo 1.13 2005
36 Mozambique 1.00 2014
37 Chad 0.80 2011
38 The Gambia 0.55 2015

More rankings: Africa | Asia | Central America & the Caribbean | Europe | Middle East | North America | Oceania | South America | World |

Limitations and Exceptions: When interpreting ASPIRE performance indicators based on household surveys, it is important to note that the extent to which information on specific transfers and programs is captured in the household surveys can vary a lot across countries. Moreover, household surveys do not capture the universe of social protection programs in the country, in best practice cases just the largest programs. As a consequence, ASPIRE indicators are not fully comparable across program categories and countries; however, they provide approximate measures of social protection systems performance. In addition, there may be cases where ASPIRE performance indicators differ from official WB country reports as ASPIRE indicators are based on a first level analysis of original survey data and unified methodology that does not necessarily reflect country-specific knowledge and in depth country analysis relying on administrative program level data and/or imputations.

Aggregation method: Simple average

Periodicity: Annual