Adequacy of social safety net programs (% of total welfare of beneficiary households) - Country Ranking - Asia

Definition: Adequacy of social safety net programs is measured by the total transfer amount received by the population participating in social safety net programs as a share of their total welfare. Welfare is defined as the total income or total expenditure of beneficiary households. Social safety net programs include cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.

Source: ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, The World Bank. Data are based on national representative household surveys. (datatopics.worldbank.org/aspire/)

See also: Thematic map, Time series comparison

Find indicator:
Rank Country Value Year
1 Georgia 34.06 2018
2 Afghanistan 27.62 2007
3 Armenia 18.30 2018
4 Uzbekistan 16.39 2018
5 Kazakhstan 12.47 2017
6 Kyrgyz Republic 11.15 2013
7 Turkey 9.54 2019
8 Russia 6.83 2017
9 Thailand 6.63 2017
10 Azerbaijan 6.08 2015
11 Sri Lanka 5.77 2016
12 Philippines 5.43 2015
13 Pakistan 5.26 2018
14 Mongolia 4.81 2016
15 Bangladesh 4.70 2016
16 India 4.62 2011
17 Indonesia 4.27 2019
18 Jordan 3.98 2010
19 Myanmar 3.54 2017
20 Yemen 3.27 2005
21 Malaysia 3.04 2016
22 Vietnam 2.89 2014
23 Iraq 2.75 2012
24 Nepal 2.51 2010
25 Tajikistan 2.43 2011
26 China 2.34 2013
27 Bhutan 2.10 2007
28 Timor-Leste 2.06 2011

More rankings: Africa | Asia | Central America & the Caribbean | Europe | Middle East | North America | Oceania | South America | World |

Limitations and Exceptions: When interpreting ASPIRE performance indicators based on household surveys, it is important to note that the extent to which information on specific transfers and programs is captured in the household surveys can vary a lot across countries. Moreover, household surveys do not capture the universe of social protection programs in the country, in best practice cases just the largest programs. As a consequence, ASPIRE indicators are not fully comparable across program categories and countries; however, they provide approximate measures of social protection systems performance. In addition, there may be cases where ASPIRE performance indicators differ from official WB country reports as ASPIRE indicators are based on a first level analysis of original survey data and unified methodology that does not necessarily reflect country-specific knowledge and in depth country analysis relying on administrative program level data and/or imputations.

Aggregation method: Simple average

Periodicity: Annual