Firms using banks to finance investment (% of firms) - Country Ranking

Definition: Firms using banks to finance investment are the percentage of firms using banks to finance investments.

Source: World Bank, Enterprise Surveys (http://www.enterprisesurveys.org/).

See also: Thematic map, Time series comparison

Find indicator:
Rank Country Value Year
1 Bulgaria 62.30 2019
2 Peru 57.10 2017
3 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 55.80 2010
4 Mali 55.10 2016
5 Colombia 53.60 2017
6 Italy 52.50 2019
7 St. Lucia 52.20 2010
8 Lesotho 51.80 2016
8 Suriname 51.80 2018
10 Belgium 51.60 2020
11 Antigua and Barbuda 49.40 2010
12 Poland 48.80 2019
13 Samoa 48.30 2009
14 Mongolia 47.90 2019
15 Israel 46.40 2013
15 St. Kitts and Nevis 46.40 2010
17 Dominica 46.20 2010
18 Barbados 45.50 2010
18 Paraguay 45.50 2017
20 Germany 45.00 2005
21 Chile 44.80 2010
22 Jamaica 44.20 2010
23 Morocco 43.90 2019
24 Brazil 43.70 2009
25 Sri Lanka 43.60 2011
26 Nicaragua 43.40 2016
27 Vanuatu 41.40 2009
28 Argentina 40.90 2017
29 Korea 39.90 2005
30 Serbia 39.40 2019
31 Jordan 39.20 2019
32 Lebanon 38.90 2019
33 Dominican Republic 38.60 2016
34 Guatemala 37.60 2017
35 Mauritius 37.50 2009
36 Honduras 37.40 2016
37 Grenada 37.20 2010
38 Fiji 37.10 2009
39 Bolivia 37.00 2017
40 Belize 36.70 2010
40 Trinidad and Tobago 36.70 2010
42 Indonesia 36.60 2015
42 Papua New Guinea 36.60 2015
44 Tunisia 35.90 2020
45 Ecuador 35.60 2017
46 North Macedonia 35.40 2019
47 Malaysia 35.30 2015
47 Cabo Verde 35.30 2009
47 Venezuela 35.30 2010
50 Guyana 34.50 2010
50 Georgia 34.50 2019
52 Czech Republic 34.00 2019
52 Bosnia and Herzegovina 34.00 2019
54 Tonga 33.90 2009
55 Russia 33.80 2019
55 Luxembourg 33.80 2020
57 Namibia 33.50 2014
58 Botswana 32.70 2010
59 Spain 32.60 2005
60 Slovenia 32.50 2019
61 Bhutan 32.20 2015
62 Uruguay 31.80 2017
63 Kenya 31.60 2018
64 Hungary 30.70 2019
65 Eswatini 30.40 2016
66 India 30.30 2014
66 Malawi 30.30 2014
66 Estonia 30.30 2019
69 Burundi 29.90 2014
70 Vietnam 29.30 2015
71 Malta 28.90 2019
72 Turkey 28.70 2019
73 Romania 28.50 2019
74 Uzbekistan 26.20 2019
75 Slovak Republic 26.00 2019
76 Togo 25.70 2016
77 Solomon Islands 25.60 2015
77 Burkina Faso 25.60 2009
79 Ireland 25.40 2020
80 Central African Republic 25.30 2011
81 El Salvador 25.20 2016
82 Finland 25.00 2020
83 Djibouti 24.30 2013
84 Côte d'Ivoire 23.60 2016
85 Belarus 23.50 2018
86 Armenia 23.10 2020
87 Costa Rica 22.20 2010
87 Denmark 22.20 2020
89 Niger 22.10 2017
90 Sweden 21.80 2020
91 Albania 21.50 2019
92 Cyprus 21.40 2019
93 Ghana 21.20 2013
94 Syrian Arab Republic 20.70 2009
95 Latvia 20.00 2019
96 Bangladesh 19.80 2013
97 Liberia 19.40 2017
98 Senegal 19.20 2014
99 Tanzania 18.50 2013
100 Lithuania 17.50 2019
101 Nepal 17.00 2013
102 Netherlands 16.90 2020
103 Kyrgyz Republic 16.70 2019
103 Portugal 16.70 2019
103 Zimbabwe 16.70 2016
106 Ukraine 16.30 2019
107 Mexico 16.20 2010
108 Montenegro 15.80 2019
108 Cameroon 15.80 2016
110 South Africa 15.40 2020
111 Thailand 15.30 2016
112 China 14.70 2012
113 The Bahamas 14.60 2010
114 Kazakhstan 14.00 2019
115 Moldova 13.80 2019
116 Croatia 13.50 2019
117 Angola 13.10 2010
118 Madagascar 13.00 2013
119 Ethiopia 12.90 2015
120 Mauritania 12.80 2014
121 Timor-Leste 12.50 2015
122 Philippines 12.40 2015
123 Rwanda 12.20 2019
124 Benin 12.00 2016
125 Eritrea 11.90 2009
126 Mozambique 11.40 2018
127 Egypt 10.30 2020
128 The Gambia 10.10 2018
129 Guinea 9.20 2016
130 Algeria 8.90 2007
130 Zambia 8.90 2019
132 Lao PDR 8.60 2018
133 Tajikistan 8.30 2019
133 Greece 8.30 2018
135 Pakistan 8.10 2013
135 Uganda 8.10 2013
137 Congo 7.70 2009
138 Chad 7.30 2018
139 Myanmar 7.10 2016
139 Dem. Rep. Congo 7.10 2013
141 Sierra Leone 7.00 2017
142 Nigeria 6.90 2014
143 Sudan 6.70 2014
144 Gabon 6.30 2009
145 Yemen 3.80 2013
146 Iraq 2.70 2011
147 Cambodia 2.50 2016
148 Afghanistan 2.00 2014
149 Panama 1.20 2010
150 Guinea-Bissau 0.70 2006
151 Azerbaijan 0.00 2019

More rankings: Africa | Asia | Central America & the Caribbean | Europe | Middle East | North America | Oceania | South America | World |

Development Relevance: Firms evaluating investment options, governments interested in improving business conditions, and economists seeking to explain economic performance have all grappled with defining and measuring the business environment. The firm-level data from Enterprise Surveys provide a useful tool for benchmarking economies across a large number of indicators measured at the firm level. Financial markets connect firms to lenders and investors, allowing firms to grow their businesses: creditworthy firms can obtain credit from financial intermediaries at competitive prices. But too often market imperfections and government-induced distortions limit access to credit and thus restrain growth. Excessive reliance on internal funds is a sign of potentially inefficient financial intermediation.

Limitations and Exceptions: The sampling methodology for Enterprise Surveys is stratified random sampling. In a simple random sample, all members of the population have the same probability of being selected and no weighting of the observations is necessary. In a stratified random sample, all population units are grouped within homogeneous groups and simple random samples are selected within each group. This method allows computing estimates for each of the strata with a specified level of precision while population estimates can also be estimated by properly weighting individual observations. The sampling weights take care of the varying probabilities of selection across different strata. Under certain conditions, estimates' precision under stratified random sampling will be higher than under simple random sampling (lower standard errors may result from the estimation procedure). The strata for Enterprise Surveys are firm size, business sector, and geographic region within a country. Firm size levels are 5-19 (small), 20-99 (medium), and 100+ employees (large-sized firms). Since in most economies, the majority of firms are small and medium-sized, Enterprise Surveys oversample large firms since larger firms tend to be engines of job creation. Sector breakdown is usually manufacturing, retail, and other services. For larger economies, specific manufacturing sub-sectors are selected as additional strata on the basis of employment, value-added, and total number of establishments figures. Geographic regions within a country are selected based on which cities/regions collectively contain the majority of economic activity. Ideally the survey sample frame is derived from the universe of eligible firms obtained from the country’s statistical office. Sometimes the master list of firms is obtained from other government agencies such as tax or business licensing authorities. In some cases, the list of firms is obtained from business associations or marketing databases. In a few cases, the sample frame is created via block enumeration, where the World Bank “manually” constructs a list of eligible firms after 1) partitioning a country’s cities of major economic activity into clusters and blocks, 2) randomly selecting a subset of blocks which will then be enumerated. In surveys conducted since 2005-06, survey documentation which explains the source of the sample frame and any special circumstances encountered during survey fieldwork are included with the collected datasets. Obtaining panel data, i.e. interviews with the same firms across multiple years, is a priority in current Enterprise Surveys. When conducting a new Enterprise Survey in a country where data was previously collected, maximal effort is expended to re-interview as many firms (from the prior survey) as possible. For these panel firms, sampling weights can be adjusted to take into account the resulting altered probabilities of inclusion in the sample frame.

Original Source Notes: All surveys were administered using the Enterprise Surveys methodology as outlined in the Methodology page which can be found from www.enterprisesurveys.org.

Statistical Concept and Methodology: Firm-level surveys have been conducted since the 1990's by different units within the World Bank. Since 2005-06, most data collection efforts have been centralized within the Enterprise Analysis Unit. Surveys implemented by the Enterprise Analysis Unit follow the Global Methodology. Private contractors conduct the Enterprise Surveys on behalf of the World Bank. Due to sensitive survey questions addressing business-government relations and bribery-related topics, private contractors, rather than any government agency or an organization/institution associated with government, are hired by the World Bank to collect the data. Confidentiality of the survey respondents and the sensitive information they provide is necessary to ensure the greatest degree of survey participation, integrity and confidence in the quality of the data. Surveys are usually carried out in cooperation with business organizations and government agencies promoting job creation and economic growth, but confidentiality is never compromised. The Enterprise Survey is answered by business owners and top managers. Sometimes the survey respondent calls company accountants and human resource managers into the interview to answer questions in the sales and labor sections of the survey. Typically 1200-1800 interviews are conducted in larger economies, 360 interviews are conducted in medium-sized economies, and for smaller economies, 150 interviews take place. The manufacturing and services sectors are the primary business sectors of interest. This corresponds to firms classified with ISIC codes 15-37, 45, 50-52, 55, 60-64, and 72 (ISIC Rev.3.1). Formal (registered) companies with 5 or more employees are targeted for interview. Services firms include construction, retail, wholesale, hotels, restaurants, transport, storage, communications, and IT. Firms with 100% government/state ownership are not eligible to participate in an Enterprise Survey. Occasionally, for a few surveyed countries, other sectors are included in the companies surveyed such as education or health-related businesses. In each country, businesses in the cities/regions of major economic activity are interviewed. In some countries, other surveys, which depart from the usual Enterprise Survey methodology, are conducted. Examples include 1) Informal Surveys- surveys of informal (unregistered) enterprises, 2) Micro Surveys- surveys fielded to registered firms with less than five employees, and 3) Financial Crisis Assessment Surveys- short surveys administered by telephone to assess the effects of the global financial crisis of 2008-09. The Enterprise Surveys Unit uses two instruments: the Manufacturing Questionnaire and the Services Questionnaire. Although many questions overlap, some are only applicable to one type of business. For example, retail firms are not asked about production and nonproduction workers. The standard Enterprise Survey topics include firm characteristics, gender participation, access to finance, annual sales, costs of inputs/labor, workforce composition, bribery, licensing, infrastructure, trade, crime, competition, capacity utilization, land and permits, taxation, informality, business-government relations, innovation and technology, and performance measures. Over 90% of the questions objectively ascertain characteristics of a country’s business environment. The remaining questions assess the survey respondents’ opinions on what are the obstacles to firm growth and performance. The mode of data collection is face-to-face interviews.

Aggregation method: Unweighted average

Periodicity: Annual