Average time to clear exports through customs (days) - Country Ranking

Definition: Average time to clear exports through customs is the average number of days to clear direct exports through customs.

Source: World Bank, Enterprise Surveys (http://www.enterprisesurveys.org/).

See also: Thematic map, Time series comparison

Find indicator:
Rank Country Value Year
1 Mozambique 39.30 2018
2 Mauritania 26.00 2014
3 Burundi 20.60 2014
4 Côte d'Ivoire 19.60 2016
5 Venezuela 18.40 2010
6 Benin 17.90 2016
7 Suriname 17.70 2018
8 Mali 16.50 2016
9 Brazil 16.40 2009
10 Russia 15.60 2019
11 Philippines 14.50 2015
12 Cyprus 14.10 2019
12 Algeria 14.10 2007
14 Portugal 13.70 2019
15 Jamaica 13.10 2010
16 Bhutan 12.70 2015
17 Colombia 12.50 2017
18 Tanzania 12.40 2013
19 Lebanon 12.30 2019
20 Armenia 12.00 2020
21 Chad 11.90 2009
22 Iraq 11.80 2011
23 Fiji 11.60 2009
24 Guyana 11.50 2010
25 Malawi 11.40 2014
25 Pakistan 11.40 2013
27 Yemen 11.20 2013
28 Zambia 10.80 2019
28 Chile 10.80 2010
30 Djibouti 10.40 2013
30 Samoa 10.40 2009
32 Mauritius 10.30 2009
33 Myanmar 10.20 2016
34 Liberia 10.00 2017
34 Uganda 10.00 2013
34 Costa Rica 10.00 2010
37 Kenya 9.70 2018
37 Bolivia 9.70 2017
39 Eritrea 9.60 2009
40 Central African Republic 9.50 2011
41 Dominican Republic 9.40 2016
42 Grenada 9.30 2010
43 Ecuador 9.20 2017
44 Kazakhstan 9.00 2019
45 Madagascar 8.60 2013
45 Paraguay 8.60 2017
47 Nepal 8.50 2013
48 Peru 8.40 2017
49 Indonesia 8.30 2015
50 Namibia 8.20 2014
50 Togo 8.20 2016
50 South Africa 8.20 2020
53 Afghanistan 8.10 2014
54 Rwanda 8.00 2019
55 Ghana 7.80 2013
56 Ethiopia 7.70 2015
57 China 7.60 2012
57 Sri Lanka 7.60 2011
57 Panama 7.60 2010
60 Burkina Faso 7.40 2009
61 Trinidad and Tobago 7.30 2010
62 Korea 7.20 2005
62 Lao PDR 7.20 2018
64 Senegal 7.10 2014
65 Mexico 7.00 2010
65 Bangladesh 7.00 2013
67 Vietnam 6.90 2015
68 Angola 6.70 2010
68 Cameroon 6.70 2016
68 St. Kitts and Nevis 6.70 2010
68 Morocco 6.70 2019
68 Egypt 6.70 2020
68 Tunisia 6.70 2020
74 Argentina 6.50 2017
74 Barbados 6.50 2010
76 Antigua and Barbuda 6.40 2010
76 Finland 6.40 2020
78 Dem. Rep. Congo 6.30 2013
78 Solomon Islands 6.30 2015
78 Timor-Leste 6.30 2015
78 Malaysia 6.30 2015
82 Botswana 6.20 2010
82 Belize 6.20 2010
84 Denmark 6.10 2020
84 Belgium 6.10 2020
84 The Bahamas 6.10 2010
87 Nigeria 6.00 2014
88 Zimbabwe 5.90 2016
89 India 5.80 2014
90 Guinea-Bissau 5.60 2006
91 Italy 5.50 2019
92 Nicaragua 5.20 2016
93 Syrian Arab Republic 5.10 2009
94 Cambodia 4.90 2016
94 Spain 4.90 2005
94 St. Lucia 4.90 2010
97 Dominica 4.80 2010
97 The Gambia 4.80 2018
97 Bulgaria 4.80 2019
100 Germany 4.70 2005
100 Slovenia 4.70 2019
100 Jordan 4.70 2019
103 Israel 4.60 2013
103 Mongolia 4.60 2019
105 Guatemala 4.50 2017
106 North Macedonia 4.40 2019
107 Guinea 4.30 2006
108 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 4.20 2010
109 Eswatini 4.10 2016
110 Lesotho 4.00 2016
110 Lithuania 4.00 2019
112 Ukraine 3.90 2019
113 Gabon 3.80 2009
113 Luxembourg 3.80 2020
113 Czech Republic 3.80 2019
113 Honduras 3.80 2016
117 Uzbekistan 3.70 2019
118 Malta 3.50 2019
119 Netherlands 3.30 2020
119 Ireland 3.30 2020
121 Romania 3.20 2019
122 Poland 3.10 2019
123 El Salvador 2.90 2016
123 Sweden 2.90 2020
123 Azerbaijan 2.90 2019
126 Turkey 2.60 2019
126 Niger 2.60 2009
128 Georgia 2.50 2019
128 Slovak Republic 2.50 2019
130 Greece 2.40 2018
131 Moldova 2.30 2019
131 Tonga 2.30 2009
133 Latvia 2.10 2019
133 Croatia 2.10 2019
133 Uruguay 2.10 2017
133 Tajikistan 2.10 2019
137 Thailand 1.90 2016
137 Hungary 1.90 2019
139 Kyrgyz Republic 1.80 2019
139 Estonia 1.80 2019
141 Serbia 1.60 2019
142 Belarus 1.40 2018
143 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1.30 2019
143 Montenegro 1.30 2019
145 Albania 1.10 2019

More rankings: Africa | Asia | Central America & the Caribbean | Europe | Middle East | North America | Oceania | South America | World |

Development Relevance: Firms evaluating investment options, governments interested in improving business conditions, and economists seeking to explain economic performance have all grappled with defining and measuring the business environment. The firm-level data from Enterprise Surveys provide a useful tool for benchmarking economies across a large number of indicators measured at the firm level. International trade can be beneficial for firms in terms of less expensive inputs for manufacturing and new markets for exporting finished products and services. Time spent waiting for imports and exports to clear customs can be costly for firms and deter them from engaging in trade or making them uncompetitive globally.

Limitations and Exceptions: The sampling methodology for Enterprise Surveys is stratified random sampling. In a simple random sample, all members of the population have the same probability of being selected and no weighting of the observations is necessary. In a stratified random sample, all population units are grouped within homogeneous groups and simple random samples are selected within each group. This method allows computing estimates for each of the strata with a specified level of precision while population estimates can also be estimated by properly weighting individual observations. The sampling weights take care of the varying probabilities of selection across different strata. Under certain conditions, estimates' precision under stratified random sampling will be higher than under simple random sampling (lower standard errors may result from the estimation procedure). The strata for Enterprise Surveys are firm size, business sector, and geographic region within a country. Firm size levels are 5-19 (small), 20-99 (medium), and 100+ employees (large-sized firms). Since in most economies, the majority of firms are small and medium-sized, Enterprise Surveys oversample large firms since larger firms tend to be engines of job creation. Sector breakdown is usually manufacturing, retail, and other services. For larger economies, specific manufacturing sub-sectors are selected as additional strata on the basis of employment, value-added, and total number of establishments figures. Geographic regions within a country are selected based on which cities/regions collectively contain the majority of economic activity. Ideally the survey sample frame is derived from the universe of eligible firms obtained from the country’s statistical office. Sometimes the master list of firms is obtained from other government agencies such as tax or business licensing authorities. In some cases, the list of firms is obtained from business associations or marketing databases. In a few cases, the sample frame is created via block enumeration, where the World Bank “manually” constructs a list of eligible firms after 1) partitioning a country’s cities of major economic activity into clusters and blocks, 2) randomly selecting a subset of blocks which will then be enumerated. In surveys conducted since 2005-06, survey documentation which explains the source of the sample frame and any special circumstances encountered during survey fieldwork are included with the collected datasets. Obtaining panel data, i.e. interviews with the same firms across multiple years, is a priority in current Enterprise Surveys. When conducting a new Enterprise Survey in a country where data was previously collected, maximal effort is expended to re-interview as many firms (from the prior survey) as possible. For these panel firms, sampling weights can be adjusted to take into account the resulting altered probabilities of inclusion in the sample frame.

Original Source Notes: All surveys were administered using the Enterprise Surveys methodology as outlined in the Methodology page which can be found from www.enterprisesurveys.org.

Statistical Concept and Methodology: Firm-level surveys have been conducted since the 1990's by different units within the World Bank. Since 2005-06, most data collection efforts have been centralized within the Enterprise Analysis Unit. Surveys implemented by the Enterprise Analysis Unit follow the Global Methodology. Private contractors conduct the Enterprise Surveys on behalf of the World Bank. Due to sensitive survey questions addressing business-government relations and bribery-related topics, private contractors, rather than any government agency or an organization/institution associated with government, are hired by the World Bank to collect the data. Confidentiality of the survey respondents and the sensitive information they provide is necessary to ensure the greatest degree of survey participation, integrity and confidence in the quality of the data. Surveys are usually carried out in cooperation with business organizations and government agencies promoting job creation and economic growth, but confidentiality is never compromised. The Enterprise Survey is answered by business owners and top managers. Sometimes the survey respondent calls company accountants and human resource managers into the interview to answer questions in the sales and labor sections of the survey. Typically 1200-1800 interviews are conducted in larger economies, 360 interviews are conducted in medium-sized economies, and for smaller economies, 150 interviews take place. The manufacturing and services sectors are the primary business sectors of interest. This corresponds to firms classified with ISIC codes 15-37, 45, 50-52, 55, 60-64, and 72 (ISIC Rev.3.1). Formal (registered) companies with 5 or more employees are targeted for interview. Services firms include construction, retail, wholesale, hotels, restaurants, transport, storage, communications, and IT. Firms with 100% government/state ownership are not eligible to participate in an Enterprise Survey. Occasionally, for a few surveyed countries, other sectors are included in the companies surveyed such as education or health-related businesses. In each country, businesses in the cities/regions of major economic activity are interviewed. In some countries, other surveys, which depart from the usual Enterprise Survey methodology, are conducted. Examples include 1) Informal Surveys- surveys of informal (unregistered) enterprises, 2) Micro Surveys- surveys fielded to registered firms with less than five employees, and 3) Financial Crisis Assessment Surveys- short surveys administered by telephone to assess the effects of the global financial crisis of 2008-09. The Enterprise Surveys Unit uses two instruments: the Manufacturing Questionnaire and the Services Questionnaire. Although many questions overlap, some are only applicable to one type of business. For example, retail firms are not asked about production and nonproduction workers. The standard Enterprise Survey topics include firm characteristics, gender participation, access to finance, annual sales, costs of inputs/labor, workforce composition, bribery, licensing, infrastructure, trade, crime, competition, capacity utilization, land and permits, taxation, informality, business-government relations, innovation and technology, and performance measures. Over 90% of the questions objectively ascertain characteristics of a country’s business environment. The remaining questions assess the survey respondents’ opinions on what are the obstacles to firm growth and performance. The mode of data collection is face-to-face interviews.

Aggregation method: Unweighted average

Periodicity: Annual