Net ODA received (% of central government expense) - Country Ranking

Definition: Net official development assistance (ODA) consists of disbursements of loans made on concessional terms (net of repayments of principal) and grants by official agencies of the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC), by multilateral institutions, and by non-DAC countries to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. It includes loans with a grant element of at least 25 percent (calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent).

Source: Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, and International Development Statistics database. Data

See also: Thematic map, Time series comparison

Find indicator:
Rank Country Value Year
1 Somalia 15,548,980.00 2019
2 Central African Republic 291.88 2018
3 The Gambia 178.75 1990
4 Guinea 144.36 1992
5 Mali 83.86 2019
6 Tajikistan 80.20 2004
7 Malawi 74.04 2019
8 Dem. Rep. Congo 70.38 1989
9 Niger 64.88 1980
10 Mozambique 61.38 2019
11 Rwanda 59.50 2019
12 Guinea-Bissau 57.15 2019
13 Madagascar 52.91 2019
14 Afghanistan 51.82 2017
15 Ethiopia 51.67 2019
16 Samoa 50.32 2019
17 Vanuatu 50.08 2019
18 Solomon Islands 47.71 2019
19 Burundi 45.01 1999
20 Uganda 43.95 2019
21 Togo 43.94 2019
22 Burkina Faso 39.33 2019
23 Kiribati 37.26 2019
24 Nauru 36.52 2018
25 Liberia 36.47 1982
26 Tanzania 29.55 2018
27 Cameroon 25.65 2018
28 Cabo Verde 24.47 2017
29 Jordan 23.95 2019
30 Timor-Leste 23.67 2019
31 Cambodia 23.02 2019
32 Senegal 21.77 2018
33 Bhutan 21.60 2018
34 Zimbabwe 21.19 2018
35 Kyrgyz Republic 20.63 2019
36 Myanmar 20.54 2019
37 Palau 20.06 2019
38 Sudan 19.51 2016
39 Zambia 19.08 2019
40 Nicaragua 18.63 2019
41 Nepal 18.34 2019
42 Kenya 17.23 2019
43 Lesotho 15.56 2019
44 Bolivia 15.33 2007
45 Côte d'Ivoire 14.60 2019
46 St. Kitts and Nevis 14.47 2013
47 Armenia 14.16 2019
48 Papua New Guinea 14.08 2019
49 Bangladesh 12.14 2016
50 Honduras 11.81 2015
51 Georgia 11.55 2019
52 Uzbekistan 11.43 2019
53 Mongolia 11.25 2018
54 Moldova 10.33 2019
55 Lebanon 10.13 2019
56 Fiji 9.43 2019
57 Ghana 7.82 2019
58 Belize 6.75 2017
59 Bosnia and Herzegovina 6.66 2019
60 Tunisia 6.40 2012
61 Congo 5.83 2018
62 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 5.68 2017
63 Gabon 5.11 2019
64 Equatorial Guinea 4.94 2019
65 Israel 4.84 1996
66 Namibia 4.82 2019
67 El Salvador 4.59 2019
68 St. Lucia 4.37 2017
69 Guatemala 4.06 2019
70 North Macedonia 3.79 2019
71 Iraq 3.43 2019
72 Seychelles 3.23 2017
73 Jamaica 3.11 2019
74 Serbia 2.96 2019
75 Egypt 2.54 2015
76 Morocco 2.51 2019
77 Ukraine 2.26 2019
78 Bahrain 2.19 2004
79 Paraguay 2.03 2019
80 Philippines 1.62 2019
81 Botswana 1.43 2019
82 Sri Lanka 1.39 2019
83 Belarus 1.16 2019
84 Azerbaijan 1.03 2019
85 Peru 1.02 2019
86 Barbados 1.00 2010
87 Dominican Republic 0.95 2019
88 Colombia 0.90 2019
89 Albania 0.80 2019
90 The Bahamas 0.74 1995
91 South Africa 0.73 2019
92 Mauritius 0.67 2019
93 India 0.58 2018
94 Slovenia 0.54 2002
95 Croatia 0.53 2010
96 Cyprus 0.46 1996
97 Panama 0.43 2018
98 Angola 0.36 2019
99 Costa Rica 0.31 2019
100 Turkey 0.30 2019
101 Malta 0.27 2002
102 Mexico 0.21 2019
103 Uruguay 0.20 2017
104 Kazakhstan 0.19 2019
105 Singapore 0.16 1995
106 Chile 0.11 2017
107 Iran 0.11 2009
108 Trinidad and Tobago 0.06 2010
109 Brazil 0.04 2019
110 Kuwait 0.03 1995
111 Macao SAR, China 0.03 1999
112 Argentina 0.02 2019
113 Malaysia 0.01 2019
114 Korea -0.07 1999
115 Thailand -0.35 2019
116 Indonesia -0.39 2019

More rankings: Africa | Asia | Central America & the Caribbean | Europe | Middle East | North America | Oceania | South America | World |

Development Relevance: Ratio of aid to central government expense provides measures of recipient country's dependency on aid. Ratios of aid are generally much higher in Sub-Saharan Africa than in other regions, and they increased in the 1980s. High ratios are due only in part to aid flows. Many African countries saw severe erosion in their terms of trade in the 1980salong with weak policies, falling incomes, imports, and investment. Thus the increase in aid dependency ratios reflects events affecting both the numerator (aid) and the denominator (central government expense). DAC exists to help its members coordinate their development assistance and to encourage the expansion and improve the effectiveness of the aggregate resources flowing to recipient economies. In this capacity DAC monitors the flow of all financial resources, but its main concern is official development assistance (ODA). Grants or loans to countries and territories on the DAC list of aid recipients have to meet three criteria to be counted as ODA. They are provided by official agencies, including state and local governments, or by their executive agencies. They promote economic development and welfare as the main objective. And they are provided on concessional financial terms (loans must have a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a discount rate of 10 percent). The DAC Statistical Reporting Directives provide the most detailed explanation of this definition and all ODA-related rules. DAC statistics aim to meet the needs of policy makers in the field of development co-operation, and to provide a means of assessing the comparative performance of aid donors. DAC statistics are used extensively in the Peer Reviews conducted for each DAC member every four to five years, and have a wide range of other applications. They are used to measure donors' compliance with various international recommendations in the field of development co-operation (terms, volume), and are indispensable for analysis of virtually every aspect of development and development co-operation. From 1960 to 1990, official development assistance (ODA) flows from DAC countries to developing countries rose steadily, but then fell sharply in the 1990s. Since then, a series of high-profile international conferences have boosted ODA flows. In the mid-2000s, ODA once again rose due to exceptional debt relief operations for Iraq and Nigeria. Despite the recent financial crisis, ODA flows have continued to rise and in the early 2010s reached their highest real level ever at about US $130 billion. This demonstrates effectiveness of aid pledges, especially when they are made on the basis of adequate resources and backed by strong political will.

Limitations and Exceptions: Data on ODA is for aid-receiving countries. The data cover loans and grants from DAC member countries, multilateral organizations, and non-DAC donors. They do not reflect aid given by recipient countries to other developing countries. As a result, some countries that are net donors are shown as aid recipients. The indicator does not distinguish types of aid (program, project, or food aid; emergency assistance; or post-conflict peacekeeping assistance), which may have different effects on the economy. Ratio of aid to central government expense provides measures of recipient country's dependency on aid. But care must be taken in drawing policy conclusions. For foreign policy reasons some countries have traditionally received large amounts of aid. Thus aid dependency ratio may reveal as much about a donor's interests as about a recipient's needs. The nominal values used here may overstate the real value of aid to recipients. Changes in international prices and exchange rates can reduce the purchasing power of aid. Tying aid, still prevalent though declining in importance, also tends to reduce its purchasing power. Tying requires recipients to purchase goods and services from the donor country or from a specified group of countries. Such arrangements prevent a recipient from misappropriating or mismanaging aid receipts, but they may also be motivated by a desire to benefit donor country suppliers. Because the indicator relies on information from donors, it is not necessarily consistent with information recorded by recipients in the balance of payments, which often excludes all or some technical assistance - particularly payments to expatriates made directly by the donor. Similarly, grant commodity aid may not always be recorded in trade data or in the balance of payments. Moreover, DAC statistics exclude aid for military and antiterrorism purposes. The aggregates refer to World Bank classifications of economies and therefore may differ from those of the OECD.

Statistical Concept and Methodology: Net official development assistance (ODA) per capita consists of disbursements of loans made on concessional terms (net of repayments of principal) and grants by official agencies of the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC), by multilateral institutions, and by non-DAC countries to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. It includes loans with a grant element of at least 25 percent (calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent). Central government expense is cash payments for operating activities of the government in providing goods and services. It includes compensation of employees (such as wages and salaries), interest and subsidies, grants, social benefits, and other expenses such as rent and dividends. The flows of official and private financial resources from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to developing economies are compiled by DAC, based principally on reporting by DAC members using standard questionnaires issued by the DAC Secretariat. The ODA excludes nonconcessional flows from official creditors, which are classified as "other official flows," and aid for military and anti-terrorism purposes. Transfer payments to private individuals, such as pensions, reparations, and insurance payouts, are in general not counted. In addition to financial flows, ODA includes technical cooperation, most expenditures for peacekeeping under UN mandates and assistance to refugees, contributions to multilateral institutions such as the United Nations and its specialized agencies, and concessional funding to multilateral development banks. Flows are transfers of resources, either in cash or in the form of commodities or services measured on a cash basis. Short-term capital transactions (with one year or less maturity) are not counted. Repayments of the principal (but not interest) of ODA loans are recorded as negative flows. Proceeds from official equity investments in a developing country are reported as ODA, while proceeds from their later sale are recorded as negative flows. The official development assistance estimates are published annually at the end of the calendar year in International Development Statistics (IDS) database. Net ODA received as a percent of central government expense is calculated using values in U.S. dollars converted using the DEC alternative conversion factor which is the underlying annual exchange rate used for the World Bank Atlas method.

Periodicity: Annual