China - Rural population

The value for Rural population in China was 544,223,700 as of 2020. As the graph below shows, over the past 60 years this indicator reached a maximum value of 836,479,000 in 1991 and a minimum value of 544,223,700 in 2020.

Definition: Rural population refers to people living in rural areas as defined by national statistical offices. It is calculated as the difference between total population and urban population. Aggregation of urban and rural population may not add up to total population because of different country coverages.

Source: World Bank staff estimates based on the United Nations Population Division's World Urbanization Prospects: 2018 Revision.

See also:

Year Value
1960 558,984,600
1961 550,002,000
1962 551,084,500
1963 561,172,800
1964 570,563,000
1965 585,836,700
1966 603,653,100
1967 620,353,300
1968 637,762,500
1969 656,497,700
1970 675,928,200
1971 695,661,100
1972 713,898,800
1973 730,387,500
1974 744,661,500
1975 756,942,300
1976 768,187,400
1977 778,161,700
1978 785,011,500
1979 788,605,300
1980 791,287,600
1981 793,935,200
1982 797,806,100
1983 802,837,900
1984 806,618,800
1985 810,625,100
1986 815,465,000
1987 821,058,900
1988 826,508,900
1989 831,145,800
1990 835,019,400
1991 836,479,000
1992 836,448,400
1993 835,478,600
1994 833,998,500
1995 831,819,800
1996 828,956,700
1997 825,589,400
1998 821,328,900
1999 815,969,000
2000 809,645,800
2001 800,082,700
2002 788,406,300
2003 775,926,000
2004 762,817,900
2005 749,352,200
2006 735,901,800
2007 722,214,100
2008 708,173,800
2009 693,852,700
2010 679,206,300
2011 665,644,400
2012 653,193,500
2013 640,545,600
2014 627,502,500
2015 614,037,700
2016 600,413,400
2017 586,968,800
2018 572,999,400
2019 558,762,200
2020 544,223,700

Development Relevance: The rural population is calculated using the urban share reported by the United Nations Population Division. There is no universal standard for distinguishing rural from urban areas, and any urban-rural dichotomy is an oversimplification. The two distinct images - isolated farm, thriving metropolis - represent poles on a continuum. Life changes along a variety of dimensions, moving from the most remote forest outpost through fields and pastures, past tiny hamlets, through small towns with weekly farm markets, into intensively cultivated areas near large towns and small cities, eventually reaching the center of a megacity. Along the way access to infrastructure, social services, and nonfarm employment increase, and with them population density and income. A 2005 World Bank Policy Research Paper proposes an operational definition of rurality based on population density and distance to large cities (Chomitz, Buys, and Thomas 2005). The report argues that these criteria are important gradients along which economic behavior and appropriate development interventions vary substantially. Where population densities are low, markets of all kinds are thin, and the unit cost of delivering most social services and many types of infrastructure is high. Where large urban areas are distant, farm-gate or factory-gate prices of outputs will be low and input prices will be high, and it will be difficult to recruit skilled people to public service or private enterprises. Thus, low population density and remoteness together define a set of rural areas that face special development challenges. Countries differ in the way they classify population as "urban" or "rural." Most countries use an urban classification related to the size or characteristics of settlements. Some define urban areas based on the presence of certain infrastructure and services. And other countries designate urban areas based on administrative arrangements. Because of national differences in the characteristics that distinguish urban from rural areas, the distinction between urban and rural population is not amenable to a single definition that would be applicable to all countries. Rural population methodology is defined by various national statistical offices. In the United States, for example, the US Census Bureau's urban-rural classification is fundamentally a delineation of geographical areas, identifying both individual urban areas and the rural areas of the nation. "Rural" encompasses all population, housing, and territory not included within an urban area.

Limitations and Exceptions: Aggregation of urban and rural population may not add up to total population because of different country coverage. There is no consistent and universally accepted standard for distinguishing urban from rural areas, in part because of the wide variety of situations across countries. Estimates of the world's urban population would change significantly if China, India, and a few other populous nations were to change their definition of urban centers. Because the estimates of city and metropolitan area are based on national definitions of what constitutes a city or metropolitan area, cross-country comparisons should be made with caution. To estimate urban populations, UN ratios of urban to total population were applied to the World Bank's estimates of total population.

Statistical Concept and Methodology: Rural population is calculated as the difference between the total population and the urban population. Rural population is approximated as the midyear nonurban population. While a practical means of identifying the rural population, it is not a precise measure. The United Nations Population Division and other agencies provide current population estimates for developing countries that lack recent census data and pre- and post-census estimates for countries with census data.

Aggregation method: Sum

Periodicity: Annual

Classification

Topic: Environment Indicators

Sub-Topic: Density & urbanization