Brazil - Rural population

The value for Rural population in Brazil was 27,477,560 as of 2020. As the graph below shows, over the past 60 years this indicator reached a maximum value of 42,074,670 in 1973 and a minimum value of 27,477,560 in 2020.

Definition: Rural population refers to people living in rural areas as defined by national statistical offices. It is calculated as the difference between total population and urban population. Aggregation of urban and rural population may not add up to total population because of different country coverages.

Source: World Bank staff estimates based on the United Nations Population Division's World Urbanization Prospects: 2018 Revision.

See also:

Year Value
1960 38,876,460
1961 39,294,350
1962 39,711,700
1963 40,112,610
1964 40,484,460
1965 40,822,180
1966 41,120,610
1967 41,383,000
1968 41,605,170
1969 41,791,620
1970 41,936,390
1971 42,020,990
1972 42,061,770
1973 42,074,670
1974 42,064,660
1975 42,040,550
1976 42,000,520
1977 41,947,040
1978 41,875,320
1979 41,786,720
1980 41,678,060
1981 41,556,700
1982 41,413,020
1983 41,239,800
1984 41,025,670
1985 40,768,900
1986 40,461,770
1987 40,113,250
1988 39,724,500
1989 39,305,250
1990 38,857,060
1991 38,382,110
1992 37,879,940
1993 37,359,880
1994 36,824,180
1995 36,276,250
1996 35,718,100
1997 35,033,640
1998 34,328,880
1999 33,609,030
2000 32,874,570
2001 32,687,360
2002 32,532,200
2003 32,356,590
2004 32,162,490
2005 31,950,580
2006 31,719,370
2007 31,470,390
2008 31,206,850
2009 30,936,530
2010 30,658,540
2011 30,356,010
2012 30,046,540
2013 29,735,220
2014 29,416,960
2015 29,096,330
2016 28,776,240
2017 28,454,530
2018 28,133,820
2019 27,807,880
2020 27,477,560

Development Relevance: The rural population is calculated using the urban share reported by the United Nations Population Division. There is no universal standard for distinguishing rural from urban areas, and any urban-rural dichotomy is an oversimplification. The two distinct images - isolated farm, thriving metropolis - represent poles on a continuum. Life changes along a variety of dimensions, moving from the most remote forest outpost through fields and pastures, past tiny hamlets, through small towns with weekly farm markets, into intensively cultivated areas near large towns and small cities, eventually reaching the center of a megacity. Along the way access to infrastructure, social services, and nonfarm employment increase, and with them population density and income. A 2005 World Bank Policy Research Paper proposes an operational definition of rurality based on population density and distance to large cities (Chomitz, Buys, and Thomas 2005). The report argues that these criteria are important gradients along which economic behavior and appropriate development interventions vary substantially. Where population densities are low, markets of all kinds are thin, and the unit cost of delivering most social services and many types of infrastructure is high. Where large urban areas are distant, farm-gate or factory-gate prices of outputs will be low and input prices will be high, and it will be difficult to recruit skilled people to public service or private enterprises. Thus, low population density and remoteness together define a set of rural areas that face special development challenges. Countries differ in the way they classify population as "urban" or "rural." Most countries use an urban classification related to the size or characteristics of settlements. Some define urban areas based on the presence of certain infrastructure and services. And other countries designate urban areas based on administrative arrangements. Because of national differences in the characteristics that distinguish urban from rural areas, the distinction between urban and rural population is not amenable to a single definition that would be applicable to all countries. Rural population methodology is defined by various national statistical offices. In the United States, for example, the US Census Bureau's urban-rural classification is fundamentally a delineation of geographical areas, identifying both individual urban areas and the rural areas of the nation. "Rural" encompasses all population, housing, and territory not included within an urban area.

Limitations and Exceptions: Aggregation of urban and rural population may not add up to total population because of different country coverage. There is no consistent and universally accepted standard for distinguishing urban from rural areas, in part because of the wide variety of situations across countries. Estimates of the world's urban population would change significantly if China, India, and a few other populous nations were to change their definition of urban centers. Because the estimates of city and metropolitan area are based on national definitions of what constitutes a city or metropolitan area, cross-country comparisons should be made with caution. To estimate urban populations, UN ratios of urban to total population were applied to the World Bank's estimates of total population.

Statistical Concept and Methodology: Rural population is calculated as the difference between the total population and the urban population. Rural population is approximated as the midyear nonurban population. While a practical means of identifying the rural population, it is not a precise measure. The United Nations Population Division and other agencies provide current population estimates for developing countries that lack recent census data and pre- and post-census estimates for countries with census data.

Aggregation method: Sum

Periodicity: Annual

Classification

Topic: Environment Indicators

Sub-Topic: Density & urbanization