![]() |
| TABLE 5 | |||||||||||||
| SHIPMENTS OF USABLE IRON ORE FROM MINES IN THE UNITED STATES IN 20051, 2 | |||||||||||||
| Average | |||||||||||||
| Gross weight of ore shipped | iron | ||||||||||||
| (thousand metric tons) | content, | ||||||||||||
| Direct | natural | Value | |||||||||||
| District and State | shipping ore | Concentrates | Agglomerates | Total� | (percent) | (thousands) | |||||||
| Lake Superior: | |||||||||||||
| Michigan | 33 | -- | 12,600 | 12,600 | 60.2 | W | |||||||
| Minnesota | -- | 63 | 40,500 | 40,600 | 63.8 | W | |||||||
| Total reportable or average | 33 | 63 | 53,100 | 53,200 | 63.0 | $2,370,000 | |||||||
| Other States3 | -- | 10 | -- | 10 | 54.0 | 368 | |||||||
| Grand total or average | 33 | 73 | 53,100 | 53,200 | 63.0 | 2,370,000 | e | ||||||
| eEstimated.� W Withheld to avoid disclosing company proprietary data.� -- Zero. | |||||||||||||
| 1Includes byproduct ore.� Excludes ore containing 5% or more manganese. | |||||||||||||
| 2Data are rounded to no more than three significant digits; may not add to totals shown. | |||||||||||||
| 3Includes California and South Dakota. | |||||||||||||
Source: United States Geological Survey Mineral Resources Program